盆腔 X 射线检查中的患者剂量和相关曝光参数:与射线系统有关。

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5
Sachith Welarathna, Sivakumar Velautham, Sivananthan Sarasanandarajah
{"title":"盆腔 X 射线检查中的患者剂量和相关曝光参数:与射线系统有关。","authors":"Sachith Welarathna, Sivakumar Velautham, Sivananthan Sarasanandarajah","doi":"10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technological differences between computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems can influence patient doses and exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations. The presence of radiosensitive organs in the pelvic region underscores the need to optimize these parameters for both CR and DR systems. This prospective study aimed to compare the patient doses and exposure parameters for adult patients undergoing pelvic x-ray examinations using CR and DR systems, based on data from Sri Lanka. The study included data from 56 x-ray examinations, with 25 using CR and 31 using DR. Patient demographic characteristics and exposure parameters (kVp: kilovoltage peak, mAs: tube current-exposure time product) were recorded, and patient doses were measured in terms of the kerma-area product (P<sub>KA</sub>) using a P<sub>KA</sub> meter. Despite similar mean weight and body mass index (BMI), the CR systems showed significantly higher mean kVp (7.4%), mAs (16.4%), and P<sub>KA</sub> (29.7%) than the DR systems (CR - kVp: 73.2, mAs: 37.8, P<sub>KA</sub>: 2.29 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>; DR - kVp: 67.8, mAs: 31.6, P<sub>KA</sub>: 1.61 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in P<sub>KA</sub> and kVp between the CR and DR systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, even with lower patient weight and BMI, the mean mAs and P<sub>KA</sub> in this study were substantially higher than those reported in the literature for both CR and DR systems. These results suggest the need to optimize current mAs settings for the studied hospitals and introduce radiographic system-specific exposure parameters and reference dose levels for pelvic x-ray examinations in order to enhance patient protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":"433-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.\",\"authors\":\"Sachith Welarathna, Sivakumar Velautham, Sivananthan Sarasanandarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Technological differences between computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems can influence patient doses and exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations. The presence of radiosensitive organs in the pelvic region underscores the need to optimize these parameters for both CR and DR systems. This prospective study aimed to compare the patient doses and exposure parameters for adult patients undergoing pelvic x-ray examinations using CR and DR systems, based on data from Sri Lanka. The study included data from 56 x-ray examinations, with 25 using CR and 31 using DR. Patient demographic characteristics and exposure parameters (kVp: kilovoltage peak, mAs: tube current-exposure time product) were recorded, and patient doses were measured in terms of the kerma-area product (P<sub>KA</sub>) using a P<sub>KA</sub> meter. Despite similar mean weight and body mass index (BMI), the CR systems showed significantly higher mean kVp (7.4%), mAs (16.4%), and P<sub>KA</sub> (29.7%) than the DR systems (CR - kVp: 73.2, mAs: 37.8, P<sub>KA</sub>: 2.29 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>; DR - kVp: 67.8, mAs: 31.6, P<sub>KA</sub>: 1.61 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in P<sub>KA</sub> and kVp between the CR and DR systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, even with lower patient weight and BMI, the mean mAs and P<sub>KA</sub> in this study were substantially higher than those reported in the literature for both CR and DR systems. These results suggest the need to optimize current mAs settings for the studied hospitals and introduce radiographic system-specific exposure parameters and reference dose levels for pelvic x-ray examinations in order to enhance patient protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机放射成像(CR)和数字放射成像(DR)系统之间的技术差异会影响骨盆 X 射线检查中的患者剂量和曝光参数。骨盆区域存在对辐射敏感的器官,因此有必要优化 CR 和 DR 系统的这些参数。这项前瞻性研究旨在根据斯里兰卡的数据,比较使用 CR 和 DR 系统进行盆腔 X 光检查的成年患者的剂量和照射参数。研究包括 56 次 X 光检查的数据,其中 25 次使用 CR 系统,31 次使用 DR 系统。研究人员记录了患者的人口统计学特征和照射参数(kVp:千伏峰值,mAs:管电流-照射时间乘积),并使用 PKA 测量仪以 Kerma 面积乘积(PKA)的形式测量了患者的剂量。尽管平均体重和体重指数(BMI)相似,但 CR 系统的平均 kVp(7.4%)、mAs(16.4%)和 PKA(29.7%)均明显高于 DR 系统(CR - kVp:73.2;mAs:16.4%;PKA:29.7%):73.2,mAs:37.8, PKA: 2.29 Gy cm2; DR - kVp:67.8,mAs:31.6,PKA:1.61 Gy cm2)。Mann-Whitney U 检验显示,CR 和 DR 系统之间的 PKA 和 kVp 有显著的统计学差异(本研究中的 p KA 远高于文献中报道的 CR 和 DR 系统的 p KA)。这些结果表明,有必要优化所研究医院目前的 mAs 设置,并为盆腔 X 射线检查引入针对特定放射系统的曝光参数和参考剂量水平,以加强对患者的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.

Technological differences between computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems can influence patient doses and exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations. The presence of radiosensitive organs in the pelvic region underscores the need to optimize these parameters for both CR and DR systems. This prospective study aimed to compare the patient doses and exposure parameters for adult patients undergoing pelvic x-ray examinations using CR and DR systems, based on data from Sri Lanka. The study included data from 56 x-ray examinations, with 25 using CR and 31 using DR. Patient demographic characteristics and exposure parameters (kVp: kilovoltage peak, mAs: tube current-exposure time product) were recorded, and patient doses were measured in terms of the kerma-area product (PKA) using a PKA meter. Despite similar mean weight and body mass index (BMI), the CR systems showed significantly higher mean kVp (7.4%), mAs (16.4%), and PKA (29.7%) than the DR systems (CR - kVp: 73.2, mAs: 37.8, PKA: 2.29 Gy cm2; DR - kVp: 67.8, mAs: 31.6, PKA: 1.61 Gy cm2). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in PKA and kVp between the CR and DR systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, even with lower patient weight and BMI, the mean mAs and PKA in this study were substantially higher than those reported in the literature for both CR and DR systems. These results suggest the need to optimize current mAs settings for the studied hospitals and introduce radiographic system-specific exposure parameters and reference dose levels for pelvic x-ray examinations in order to enhance patient protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "The scientific nature of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model used in the system of radiological protection" by A. Wojcik and F. Zölzer. Relationships between protection and operational dosimetric quantities for external exposure to natural background radiation. Analytic and Monte Carlo calculations of dose-mean lineal energy for 1 MeV-1 GeV protons with application to radiation protection quality factor. Evaluating the biological impact of shelters on astronaut health during different solar particle events: a Geant4-DNA simulation study. Estimation of surface doses in the presence of an air gap under a bolus for a 6 MV clinical photon beam - a phantom study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1