使用 Watchman 设备关闭左心房阑尾后设备相关血栓的发生率和预测因素。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.140315
Jakub Maksym, Piotr Scisło, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka, Zenon Huczek, Michał Marchel, Janusz Kochman, Karol Zbroński, Grzegorz Opolski, Marcin Grabowski, Tomasz Mazurek
{"title":"使用 Watchman 设备关闭左心房阑尾后设备相关血栓的发生率和预测因素。","authors":"Jakub Maksym, Piotr Scisło, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka, Zenon Huczek, Michał Marchel, Janusz Kochman, Karol Zbroński, Grzegorz Opolski, Marcin Grabowski, Tomasz Mazurek","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.140315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman device prevents thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thrombus may develop on the atrial surface of the device.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus (DRT) in patients with AF who were treated with LAAC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety-one consecutive patients with AF underwent LAAC procedure using first-generation Watchman 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. In our analysis we have included all patients (<i>n</i> = 78) who had clinical follow-up visits with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 4 (4.0-6.0) and HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0). DRTs were observed in 5 (6.4%) patients. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with lower median ejection fraction (40% (23.5-45.5) versus 55% (48.0-60.0); <i>p</i> = 0.005), lower emptying velocity of LAA (25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) versus 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0); <i>p</i> = 0.009), and with greater depth of implantation (18 mm (14.0-20.5) versus 8 mm (5.0-11.0); <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with DRT had greater depth of LAA (35 mm (29.5-41.0) versus 29 mm (25.5-31.0); <i>p</i> = 0.003), greater mean (SD) dimension in 90<sup>0</sup> (22.4 mm (3.2) versus 19 mm (2.7); <i>p</i> = 0.02). Patients with DRT were also younger than those without DRT (67.4 years (7) versus 75 years (8.3), <i>p</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRT after Watchman device implantation remains a rare complication. Its formation was related to several patient and procedural characteristics, which need to be confirmed in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device.\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Maksym, Piotr Scisło, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka, Zenon Huczek, Michał Marchel, Janusz Kochman, Karol Zbroński, Grzegorz Opolski, Marcin Grabowski, Tomasz Mazurek\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/aic.2024.140315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman device prevents thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thrombus may develop on the atrial surface of the device.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus (DRT) in patients with AF who were treated with LAAC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety-one consecutive patients with AF underwent LAAC procedure using first-generation Watchman 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. In our analysis we have included all patients (<i>n</i> = 78) who had clinical follow-up visits with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 4 (4.0-6.0) and HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0). DRTs were observed in 5 (6.4%) patients. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with lower median ejection fraction (40% (23.5-45.5) versus 55% (48.0-60.0); <i>p</i> = 0.005), lower emptying velocity of LAA (25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) versus 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0); <i>p</i> = 0.009), and with greater depth of implantation (18 mm (14.0-20.5) versus 8 mm (5.0-11.0); <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with DRT had greater depth of LAA (35 mm (29.5-41.0) versus 29 mm (25.5-31.0); <i>p</i> = 0.003), greater mean (SD) dimension in 90<sup>0</sup> (22.4 mm (3.2) versus 19 mm (2.7); <i>p</i> = 0.02). Patients with DRT were also younger than those without DRT (67.4 years (7) versus 75 years (8.3), <i>p</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRT after Watchman device implantation remains a rare complication. Its formation was related to several patient and procedural characteristics, which need to be confirmed in larger studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249867/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:使用 Watchman 装置进行左心房阑尾关闭术(LAAC)可预防心房颤动(AF)患者的血栓栓塞。目的:研究接受 LAAC 治疗的房颤患者中与器械相关血栓(DRT)的发生率和预测因素:91名房颤患者连续接受了使用第一代Watchman 2.5装置的LAAC手术,随后接受了抗血小板治疗。在分析中,我们纳入了所有在术后接受经食道超声心动图(TEE)临床随访的患者(n = 78):结果:CHA2DS2-VASc评分的中位数(IQR)为4(4.0-6.0),HAS-BLED评分为3(3.0-4.0)。5例(6.4%)患者出现 DRT。与无 DRT 患者相比,DRT 患者的中位射血分数更低(40% (23.5-45.5) 对 55% (48.0-60.0);p = 0.005),LAA 排空速度更低(25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) 对 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0);p = 0.009),植入深度更大(18 mm (14.0-20.5) 对 8 mm (5.0-11.0);p < 0.001)。此外,DRT 患者的 LAA 深度更大(35 毫米(29.5-41.0)对 29 毫米(25.5-31.0);p = 0.003),900 毫米的平均(标清)尺寸更大(22.4 毫米(3.2)对 19 毫米(2.7);p = 0.02)。有 DRT 的患者也比没有 DRT 的患者年轻(67.4 岁(7)对 75 岁(8.3),p = 0.045):结论:Watchman 装置植入后的 DRT 仍是一种罕见的并发症。结论:Watchman 装置植入后的 DRT 仍是罕见的并发症,其形成与患者和手术的一些特征有关,需要在更大规模的研究中加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device.

Introduction: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman device prevents thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thrombus may develop on the atrial surface of the device.

Aim: To investigate the incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus (DRT) in patients with AF who were treated with LAAC.

Material and methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients with AF underwent LAAC procedure using first-generation Watchman 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. In our analysis we have included all patients (n = 78) who had clinical follow-up visits with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after the procedure.

Results: The median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (4.0-6.0) and HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0). DRTs were observed in 5 (6.4%) patients. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with lower median ejection fraction (40% (23.5-45.5) versus 55% (48.0-60.0); p = 0.005), lower emptying velocity of LAA (25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) versus 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0); p = 0.009), and with greater depth of implantation (18 mm (14.0-20.5) versus 8 mm (5.0-11.0); p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with DRT had greater depth of LAA (35 mm (29.5-41.0) versus 29 mm (25.5-31.0); p = 0.003), greater mean (SD) dimension in 900 (22.4 mm (3.2) versus 19 mm (2.7); p = 0.02). Patients with DRT were also younger than those without DRT (67.4 years (7) versus 75 years (8.3), p = 0.045).

Conclusions: The DRT after Watchman device implantation remains a rare complication. Its formation was related to several patient and procedural characteristics, which need to be confirmed in larger studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
期刊最新文献
A multi-center study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive patients with acute carotid-related stroke: SAFEGUARD-STROKE. Accurate evaluation of the TricValve System: the importance of double access. Back to basics: do interventional cardiologists have to relearn anatomy? Clarification of misused terminology in the context of thebesian veins. Coronary artery culprit lesions progression and ambient temperature exposure - personalised analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1