需氧性阴道炎:抗生素耐药性趋势和抗菌诊断管理的未来行动。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Francesco Foglia, Maria Teresa Della Rocca, Fortunato Montella, Maria Vasco, Annalisa Chianese, Carla Zannella, Anna De Filippis, Emiliana Finamore, Massimiliano Galdiero
{"title":"需氧性阴道炎:抗生素耐药性趋势和抗菌诊断管理的未来行动。","authors":"Francesco Foglia, Maria Teresa Della Rocca, Fortunato Montella, Maria Vasco, Annalisa Chianese, Carla Zannella, Anna De Filippis, Emiliana Finamore, Massimiliano Galdiero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study objective is to examine epidemiological and microbiological aspects of aerobic vaginitis in female patients admitted to University Hospital of Campania \"L. Vanvitelli\" over five years. The most represented strains were E. coli (n = 153), Citrobacter spp. increasing from 2020, E. faecalis (n = 149), S. haemolitycus (n = 61), and Candida albicans (n = 87). The susceptibility patterns of a selection of gram-negative and gram-positive representative bacterial isolates were examined. Carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin were most effective against gram-negative bacteria, whereas vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid exhibited greater efficacy against gram-positive bacteria. None of the E. coli and Citrobacter spp. isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and the S. haemolyticus strains were methicillin-resistant. In gram-positive isolates, gentamicin susceptibility increased in 2020 and 2021 compared to clindamycin; erythromycin showed high resistance rates in 2020. Our findings indicate that integrating proper microbiological cultures into clinical practice could improve the management of aerobic vaginitis. Moreover, they highlight the necessity of establishing a nationwide surveillance guideline to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Improvement actions in antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship must be considered when seeking the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for aerobic vaginitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"47 2","pages":"164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aerobic vaginitis: antibiotic resistance trend and future actions of antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Foglia, Maria Teresa Della Rocca, Fortunato Montella, Maria Vasco, Annalisa Chianese, Carla Zannella, Anna De Filippis, Emiliana Finamore, Massimiliano Galdiero\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study objective is to examine epidemiological and microbiological aspects of aerobic vaginitis in female patients admitted to University Hospital of Campania \\\"L. Vanvitelli\\\" over five years. The most represented strains were E. coli (n = 153), Citrobacter spp. increasing from 2020, E. faecalis (n = 149), S. haemolitycus (n = 61), and Candida albicans (n = 87). The susceptibility patterns of a selection of gram-negative and gram-positive representative bacterial isolates were examined. Carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin were most effective against gram-negative bacteria, whereas vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid exhibited greater efficacy against gram-positive bacteria. None of the E. coli and Citrobacter spp. isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and the S. haemolyticus strains were methicillin-resistant. In gram-positive isolates, gentamicin susceptibility increased in 2020 and 2021 compared to clindamycin; erythromycin showed high resistance rates in 2020. Our findings indicate that integrating proper microbiological cultures into clinical practice could improve the management of aerobic vaginitis. Moreover, they highlight the necessity of establishing a nationwide surveillance guideline to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Improvement actions in antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship must be considered when seeking the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for aerobic vaginitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"164-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对坎帕尼亚大学医院(University Hospital of Campania "L. Vanvitelli")五年来收治的需氧性阴道炎女性患者进行流行病学和微生物学方面的研究。最多的菌株是大肠杆菌(153 株)、从 2020 年开始增加的柠檬酸杆菌属、粪大肠杆菌(149 株)、血肠球菌(61 株)和白色念珠菌(87 株)。研究了部分革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性代表性细菌分离物的药敏模式。碳青霉烯类、氨基糖苷类和磷霉素对革兰氏阴性菌最有效,而万古霉素、达托霉素和利奈唑胺对革兰氏阳性菌的药效更高。大肠杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌属分离物均不产生广谱β-内酰胺酶,溶血性链球菌菌株对甲氧西林耐药。在革兰氏阳性分离株中,与克林霉素相比,2020 年和 2021 年庆大霉素的敏感性增加;2020 年红霉素的耐药率较高。我们的研究结果表明,将适当的微生物培养纳入临床实践可以改善需氧性阴道炎的治疗。此外,这些研究还强调了制定全国性监测指南以减少抗菌药耐药性的必要性。在寻求需氧菌阴道炎的适当诊断和治疗时,必须考虑改进抗菌药物诊断管理的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aerobic vaginitis: antibiotic resistance trend and future actions of antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship.

The study objective is to examine epidemiological and microbiological aspects of aerobic vaginitis in female patients admitted to University Hospital of Campania "L. Vanvitelli" over five years. The most represented strains were E. coli (n = 153), Citrobacter spp. increasing from 2020, E. faecalis (n = 149), S. haemolitycus (n = 61), and Candida albicans (n = 87). The susceptibility patterns of a selection of gram-negative and gram-positive representative bacterial isolates were examined. Carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin were most effective against gram-negative bacteria, whereas vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid exhibited greater efficacy against gram-positive bacteria. None of the E. coli and Citrobacter spp. isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and the S. haemolyticus strains were methicillin-resistant. In gram-positive isolates, gentamicin susceptibility increased in 2020 and 2021 compared to clindamycin; erythromycin showed high resistance rates in 2020. Our findings indicate that integrating proper microbiological cultures into clinical practice could improve the management of aerobic vaginitis. Moreover, they highlight the necessity of establishing a nationwide surveillance guideline to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Improvement actions in antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship must be considered when seeking the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for aerobic vaginitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of infection indicators and risk factors for influenza A after the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Pharmacology of the Single Tablet Regimen Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the evolving era of antiretroviral therapies. Comparison between rapid and laboratory serological tests in the context of the first responders during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: are the two tests interchangeable? Critical insights into the ocular surface microbiome: the need to standardize. Epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors of mixed infection in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1