利用经济分析为卫生资源分配提供信息:马拉维的经验教训。

Discover health systems Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s44250-024-00115-4
Megha Rao, Dominic Nkhoma, Sakshi Mohan, Pakwanja Twea, Benson Chilima, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Jessica Ochalek, Timothy B Hallett, Andrew N Phillips, Finn McGuire, Beth Woods, Simon Walker, Mark Sculpher, Paul Revill
{"title":"利用经济分析为卫生资源分配提供信息:马拉维的经验教训。","authors":"Megha Rao, Dominic Nkhoma, Sakshi Mohan, Pakwanja Twea, Benson Chilima, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Jessica Ochalek, Timothy B Hallett, Andrew N Phillips, Finn McGuire, Beth Woods, Simon Walker, Mark Sculpher, Paul Revill","doi":"10.1007/s44250-024-00115-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite making remarkable strides in improving health outcomes, Malawi faces concerns about sustaining the progress achieved due to limited fiscal space and donor dependency. The imperative for efficient health spending becomes evident, necessitating strategic allocation of resources to areas with the greatest impact on mortality and morbidity. Health benefits packages hold promise in supporting efficient resource allocation. However, despite defining these packages over the last two decades, their development and implementation have posed significant challenges for Malawi. In response, the Malawian government, in collaboration with the Thanzi la Onse Programme, has developed a set of tools and frameworks, primarily based on cost-effectiveness analysis, to guide the design of health benefits packages likely to achieve national health objectives. This review provides an overview of these tools and frameworks, accompanied by other related analyses, aiming to better align health financing with health benefits package prioritization. The paper is organized around five key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) What interventions should the health system deliver? (ii) How should resources be allocated geographically? (iii) How should investments in health system inputs be prioritized? (iv) How should equity considerations be incorporated into resource allocation decisions? and (v) How should evidence generation be prioritized to support resource allocation decisions (guiding research)? The tools and frameworks presented here are intended to be compatible for use in diverse and often complex healthcare systems across Africa, supporting the health resource allocation process as countries pursue Universal Health Coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":72826,"journal":{"name":"Discover health systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using economic analysis to inform health resource allocation: lessons from Malawi.\",\"authors\":\"Megha Rao, Dominic Nkhoma, Sakshi Mohan, Pakwanja Twea, Benson Chilima, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Jessica Ochalek, Timothy B Hallett, Andrew N Phillips, Finn McGuire, Beth Woods, Simon Walker, Mark Sculpher, Paul Revill\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44250-024-00115-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite making remarkable strides in improving health outcomes, Malawi faces concerns about sustaining the progress achieved due to limited fiscal space and donor dependency. The imperative for efficient health spending becomes evident, necessitating strategic allocation of resources to areas with the greatest impact on mortality and morbidity. Health benefits packages hold promise in supporting efficient resource allocation. However, despite defining these packages over the last two decades, their development and implementation have posed significant challenges for Malawi. In response, the Malawian government, in collaboration with the Thanzi la Onse Programme, has developed a set of tools and frameworks, primarily based on cost-effectiveness analysis, to guide the design of health benefits packages likely to achieve national health objectives. This review provides an overview of these tools and frameworks, accompanied by other related analyses, aiming to better align health financing with health benefits package prioritization. The paper is organized around five key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) What interventions should the health system deliver? (ii) How should resources be allocated geographically? (iii) How should investments in health system inputs be prioritized? (iv) How should equity considerations be incorporated into resource allocation decisions? and (v) How should evidence generation be prioritized to support resource allocation decisions (guiding research)? The tools and frameworks presented here are intended to be compatible for use in diverse and often complex healthcare systems across Africa, supporting the health resource allocation process as countries pursue Universal Health Coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discover health systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discover health systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00115-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover health systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00115-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管马拉维在改善卫生成果方面取得了长足进步,但由于财政空间有限和对捐助方的依赖,马拉维面临着能否保持已取得进展的问题。显然,高效的卫生支出势在必行,这就需要将资源战略性地分配到对死亡率和发病率影响最大的领域。一揽子保健福利有望支持有效的资源分配。然而,尽管在过去二十年中确定了这些一揽子计划,但其制定和实施给马拉维带来了重大挑战。为此,马拉维政府与 Thanzi la Onse 计划合作,开发了一套主要基于成本效益分析的工具和框架,以指导设计有可能实现国家卫生目标的一揽子卫生福利。本综述概述了这些工具和框架,并附有其他相关分析,旨在使卫生筹资与卫生福利一揽子计划的优先次序更加一致。本文围绕决策者面临的五个关键政策问题展开:(i) 卫生系统应提供哪些干预措施? (ii) 应如何按地域分配资源? (iii) 应如何优先考虑对卫生系统投入的投资?(iv) 如何将公平因素纳入资源分配决策? (v) 如何优先生成证据,以支持资源分配决策(指导研究)?本文介绍的工具和框架旨在兼容用于非洲各地不同且往往复杂的医疗保健系统,在各国追求全民医保的过程中为医疗资源分配提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using economic analysis to inform health resource allocation: lessons from Malawi.

Despite making remarkable strides in improving health outcomes, Malawi faces concerns about sustaining the progress achieved due to limited fiscal space and donor dependency. The imperative for efficient health spending becomes evident, necessitating strategic allocation of resources to areas with the greatest impact on mortality and morbidity. Health benefits packages hold promise in supporting efficient resource allocation. However, despite defining these packages over the last two decades, their development and implementation have posed significant challenges for Malawi. In response, the Malawian government, in collaboration with the Thanzi la Onse Programme, has developed a set of tools and frameworks, primarily based on cost-effectiveness analysis, to guide the design of health benefits packages likely to achieve national health objectives. This review provides an overview of these tools and frameworks, accompanied by other related analyses, aiming to better align health financing with health benefits package prioritization. The paper is organized around five key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) What interventions should the health system deliver? (ii) How should resources be allocated geographically? (iii) How should investments in health system inputs be prioritized? (iv) How should equity considerations be incorporated into resource allocation decisions? and (v) How should evidence generation be prioritized to support resource allocation decisions (guiding research)? The tools and frameworks presented here are intended to be compatible for use in diverse and often complex healthcare systems across Africa, supporting the health resource allocation process as countries pursue Universal Health Coverage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maternal and child health services at Hiwot Fana comprehensive specialized hospital, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia: a descriptive analysis based on hospital secondary data Comparison of explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate drug prescribing among the elderly: a narrative review Testing asymptomatic mental health patients for COVID-19 overburdens hospital resources Validation of the interdisciplinary Norwegian vision assessment tool KROSS in stroke patients admitted to hospital or rehabilitation services ICF-based multidisciplinary approach to rehabilitation of people with disabilities: perspective and current practices within the Health, Rehabilitation, Integration, and Research Center in Lebanon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1