豆类和芝麻口服食物挑战结果。

Jacob J Pozin, Ashley L Devonshire, Kevin Tom, Melanie Makhija, Anne Marie Singh
{"title":"豆类和芝麻口服食物挑战结果。","authors":"Jacob J Pozin, Ashley L Devonshire, Kevin Tom, Melanie Makhija, Anne Marie Singh","doi":"10.2500/jfa.2021.3.210009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume oral food challenges (OFC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame OFCs between 2007 and 2017 at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression models that predicted OFC outcome were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients (median age, 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.9%), and 25 patients (median age, 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (61.0%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUA/L and, to sesame, was 2.34 kUA/L. In patients with failed legume OFC, 60.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 20.0% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 20.0% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80.0% were controlled with antihistamine alone and 20.0% required epinephrine. In patients for whom sesame OFC failed, 50.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 12.5% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 37.50% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6.3% required epinephrine, 31.3% were controlled with diphenhydramine alone, and 63.50% required additional epinephrine or prednisone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most OFCs to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be nonsevere. Sesame OFC that failed was almost twice as likely compared with legume OFC that failed, and reactions to sesame OFC that failed were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":73751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food allergy","volume":"3 2","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legume and sesame oral food challenge outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob J Pozin, Ashley L Devonshire, Kevin Tom, Melanie Makhija, Anne Marie Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/jfa.2021.3.210009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume oral food challenges (OFC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame OFCs between 2007 and 2017 at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression models that predicted OFC outcome were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients (median age, 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.9%), and 25 patients (median age, 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (61.0%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUA/L and, to sesame, was 2.34 kUA/L. In patients with failed legume OFC, 60.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 20.0% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 20.0% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80.0% were controlled with antihistamine alone and 20.0% required epinephrine. In patients for whom sesame OFC failed, 50.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 12.5% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 37.50% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6.3% required epinephrine, 31.3% were controlled with diphenhydramine alone, and 63.50% required additional epinephrine or prednisone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most OFCs to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be nonsevere. Sesame OFC that failed was almost twice as likely compared with legume OFC that failed, and reactions to sesame OFC that failed were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food allergy\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"42-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/jfa.2021.3.210009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/jfa.2021.3.210009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:豆类和芝麻是新出现的食物过敏原:豆类和芝麻是新出现的食物过敏原。特异性免疫球蛋白 E(sIgE)检测在预测对这些过敏原的临床反应性方面的作用尚未得到很好的描述:描述芝麻和豆类口服食物挑战(OFC)的临床结果和 sIgE:我们对 2007 年至 2017 年期间芝加哥安-卢瑞儿童医院(Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago)的 74 例豆类和芝麻 OFC 进行了回顾性研究。我们收集了临床数据、OFC结果以及豆类和芝麻的sIgE。生成了预测 OFC 结局的接收者操作特征曲线和逻辑回归模型:28名患者(中位年龄 6.15 岁)通过了豆类 OFC(84.9%),25 名患者(中位年龄 5.91 岁)通过了芝麻 OFC(61.0%)。豆类的 sIgE 中位数为 1.41 kUA/L,芝麻的 sIgE 中位数为 2.34 kUA/L。在豆类 OFC 检测失败的患者中,60.0% 出现皮肤症状,20.0% 出现胃肠道症状,20.0% 出现过敏性休克。在这些反应中,80.0%仅用抗组胺药就能控制,20.0%需要肾上腺素。在芝麻 OFC 失效的患者中,50.0% 出现皮肤症状,12.5% 出现胃肠道症状,37.50% 出现过敏性休克。在这些反应中,6.3%需要肾上腺素,31.3%仅用苯海拉明就能控制,63.50%需要额外的肾上腺素或强的松:结论:大多数豆科植物的 OFC 都通过了,豆科植物 OFC 失败的反应更可能不严重。芝麻 OFC 失败的几率几乎是豆类 OFC 失败几率的两倍,而且芝麻 OFC 失败后的反应往往更严重。芝麻 sIgE 与 OFC 的结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legume and sesame oral food challenge outcomes.

Background: Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.

Objective: To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume oral food challenges (OFC).

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame OFCs between 2007 and 2017 at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression models that predicted OFC outcome were generated.

Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age, 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.9%), and 25 patients (median age, 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (61.0%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUA/L and, to sesame, was 2.34 kUA/L. In patients with failed legume OFC, 60.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 20.0% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 20.0% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80.0% were controlled with antihistamine alone and 20.0% required epinephrine. In patients for whom sesame OFC failed, 50.0% had cutaneous symptoms, 12.5% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 37.50% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6.3% required epinephrine, 31.3% were controlled with diphenhydramine alone, and 63.50% required additional epinephrine or prednisone.

Conclusion: Most OFCs to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be nonsevere. Sesame OFC that failed was almost twice as likely compared with legume OFC that failed, and reactions to sesame OFC that failed were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The public health burden of parent-reported food allergy-related missed school days among US children. A decade of progress in prevention and management of food allergy and anaphylaxis. A diagnostic approach to IgE-mediated food allergy: A practical algorithm. Anaphylaxis: Definition and criteria. Epinephrine autoinjectors for individuals with food allergy: Who, how many, and when to use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1