放射诊断 NRMP 匹配数据中不断增加的神奇数字和其他趋势。

Trenton Taros, Christopher Thomas Zoppo, Anthony Michael Camargo, Carolynn Michelle DeBenedectis
{"title":"放射诊断 NRMP 匹配数据中不断增加的神奇数字和其他趋势。","authors":"Trenton Taros, Christopher Thomas Zoppo, Anthony Michael Camargo, Carolynn Michelle DeBenedectis","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The magic number, or number of ranks needed to achieve a greater than 90 % chance of matching, has not been investigated for diagnostic radiology (DR). Somewhat reflective of a field's changing competitiveness, this individual metric can be useful for reassuring applicants or identifying a need to reach out to mentors. The NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match was accessed over the previous 10 cycles to assess changes to magic number and other match-related metrics. Over the last 10 cycles, there has been an increase in magic number for prospective radiologists. Based on the most 2022 recent report, the magic number was 14 compared to 5 and 2 in 2014 and 2016 respectively. Compared to the average US MD senior, those applying into DR were significantly more likely to match in 2014, 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.01 for all), and significantly less likely to match in 2018 and 2022 (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). This trend has had important consequences for applicants and programs as the incentive to apply more widely grows. The increasing magic number demonstrates increasing competitiveness in the field, which might be due to a positive job market, changing medical student preferences, or increased access to radiology electives and mentors. The 2024 Charting Outcomes document will be the first to include data from a class almost entirely affected by the change to a pass/fail Step1 and the new preference signaling supplement. It is currently unclear how either change will affect the overall competitiveness of the field and the magic number.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing magic number and other trends in diagnostic radiology NRMP match data.\",\"authors\":\"Trenton Taros, Christopher Thomas Zoppo, Anthony Michael Camargo, Carolynn Michelle DeBenedectis\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The magic number, or number of ranks needed to achieve a greater than 90 % chance of matching, has not been investigated for diagnostic radiology (DR). Somewhat reflective of a field's changing competitiveness, this individual metric can be useful for reassuring applicants or identifying a need to reach out to mentors. The NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match was accessed over the previous 10 cycles to assess changes to magic number and other match-related metrics. Over the last 10 cycles, there has been an increase in magic number for prospective radiologists. Based on the most 2022 recent report, the magic number was 14 compared to 5 and 2 in 2014 and 2016 respectively. Compared to the average US MD senior, those applying into DR were significantly more likely to match in 2014, 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.01 for all), and significantly less likely to match in 2018 and 2022 (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). This trend has had important consequences for applicants and programs as the incentive to apply more widely grows. The increasing magic number demonstrates increasing competitiveness in the field, which might be due to a positive job market, changing medical student preferences, or increased access to radiology electives and mentors. The 2024 Charting Outcomes document will be the first to include data from a class almost entirely affected by the change to a pass/fail Step1 and the new preference signaling supplement. It is currently unclear how either change will affect the overall competitiveness of the field and the magic number.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于放射诊断学(DR)而言,尚未研究过 "神奇数字",即实现 90% 以上匹配几率所需的等级数量。这一指标在一定程度上反映了一个领域不断变化的竞争力,它可以帮助申请人放心或确定是否需要联系导师。在过去的 10 个周期中,我们访问了 NRMP 的 "匹配结果图表"(Charting Outcomes in the Match),以评估神奇数字和其他匹配相关指标的变化。在过去的 10 个周期中,未来放射科医师的神奇数字一直在增加。根据最近2022年的报告,神奇数字为14,而2014年和2016年分别为5和2。与普通的美国医学博士高年级学生相比,申请 DR 的学生在 2014 年、2016 年和 2020 年匹配的可能性明显更高(P 均 < 0.01),而在 2018 年和 2022 年匹配的可能性明显更低(P = 0.03 和 P < 0.01)。这一趋势对申请者和项目产生了重要影响,因为更广泛地进行申请的动力在增加。神奇数字的不断增加表明该领域的竞争力在不断增强,这可能是由于就业市场看好、医学生的偏好发生变化,或放射学选修课和导师的机会增加。2024 年 "成果图表 "文件将是第一份包含几乎完全受 "及格/不及格 "Step1 和新偏好信号补充的影响的班级数据的文件。目前还不清楚这两项变革将如何影响该领域的整体竞争力和神奇数字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing magic number and other trends in diagnostic radiology NRMP match data.

The magic number, or number of ranks needed to achieve a greater than 90 % chance of matching, has not been investigated for diagnostic radiology (DR). Somewhat reflective of a field's changing competitiveness, this individual metric can be useful for reassuring applicants or identifying a need to reach out to mentors. The NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match was accessed over the previous 10 cycles to assess changes to magic number and other match-related metrics. Over the last 10 cycles, there has been an increase in magic number for prospective radiologists. Based on the most 2022 recent report, the magic number was 14 compared to 5 and 2 in 2014 and 2016 respectively. Compared to the average US MD senior, those applying into DR were significantly more likely to match in 2014, 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.01 for all), and significantly less likely to match in 2018 and 2022 (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). This trend has had important consequences for applicants and programs as the incentive to apply more widely grows. The increasing magic number demonstrates increasing competitiveness in the field, which might be due to a positive job market, changing medical student preferences, or increased access to radiology electives and mentors. The 2024 Charting Outcomes document will be the first to include data from a class almost entirely affected by the change to a pass/fail Step1 and the new preference signaling supplement. It is currently unclear how either change will affect the overall competitiveness of the field and the magic number.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing radiology training with GPT-4: Pilot analysis of automated feedback in trainee preliminary reports. Instagram reels versus image posts in radiology education. Qualitative interviews for hospitalists addressing lung cancer screening. Multidetector computed tomography imaging planning for bronchoscopy stent and valve placement in the treatment of COPD, air leaks, and airway stenosis. The tipping point: Key oncologic imaging findings resulting in critical changes in the management of malignant genitourinary and gynecological tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1