肝硬化患者食管鳞状细胞癌的临床预后

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100817
Dae Gon Ryu , Mi Sook Yun , Hongqun Liu , Samuel S. Lee , Sangjune Laurence Lee
{"title":"肝硬化患者食管鳞状细胞癌的临床预后","authors":"Dae Gon Ryu ,&nbsp;Mi Sook Yun ,&nbsp;Hongqun Liu ,&nbsp;Samuel S. Lee ,&nbsp;Sangjune Laurence Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Alcohol consumption is a strong risk factor for both cirrhosis and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Few studies have been conducted on the treatment of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Medical records of patients with esophageal cancer between January 2009 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 479 patients with ESCC were included and divided into cirrhotic (n = 69) and non-cirrhotic (n = 410) groups. Clinical outcomes and survival according to treatment were compared between these groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cirrhotic group was younger (median age 64 years vs. 69 years, <em>p</em> = 0.022) and had a higher proportion of male (97.1 % vs. 88.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.042) than the non-cirrhotic group. Patients with cirrhosis were less likely to undergo surgery (31.9 % vs. 47.8 %, <em>p</em> = 0.015) and were more likely to receive no active cancer treatment (26.1 % vs. 13.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.010). Overall survival was lower in the cirrhotic group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.99; <em>p</em> = 0.045), however, no difference was found between Child-Pugh class A patients and those in the non-cirrhotic group (HR, 1.04 [95 % CI, 0.69–1.56]; <em>p</em> = 0.864). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in cirrhotic group (27.3 % vs. 8.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Upon performing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the clinical complete response rate (84.2 % vs. 43.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004) was better in the cirrhotic group. CRT yielded better overall survival for patients with cancer in the resectable stages in the cirrhotic group compared to surgery (HR, 0.19 [95 % CI, 0.42–0.84]; <em>p</em> = 0.029].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patient with ESCC and cirrhosis, chemoradiotherapy may be a better treatment option than surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000946/pdfft?md5=9753b7c2851cb347005d824441236c0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000946-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis\",\"authors\":\"Dae Gon Ryu ,&nbsp;Mi Sook Yun ,&nbsp;Hongqun Liu ,&nbsp;Samuel S. Lee ,&nbsp;Sangjune Laurence Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Alcohol consumption is a strong risk factor for both cirrhosis and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Few studies have been conducted on the treatment of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Medical records of patients with esophageal cancer between January 2009 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 479 patients with ESCC were included and divided into cirrhotic (n = 69) and non-cirrhotic (n = 410) groups. Clinical outcomes and survival according to treatment were compared between these groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cirrhotic group was younger (median age 64 years vs. 69 years, <em>p</em> = 0.022) and had a higher proportion of male (97.1 % vs. 88.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.042) than the non-cirrhotic group. Patients with cirrhosis were less likely to undergo surgery (31.9 % vs. 47.8 %, <em>p</em> = 0.015) and were more likely to receive no active cancer treatment (26.1 % vs. 13.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.010). Overall survival was lower in the cirrhotic group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.99; <em>p</em> = 0.045), however, no difference was found between Child-Pugh class A patients and those in the non-cirrhotic group (HR, 1.04 [95 % CI, 0.69–1.56]; <em>p</em> = 0.864). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in cirrhotic group (27.3 % vs. 8.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Upon performing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the clinical complete response rate (84.2 % vs. 43.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004) was better in the cirrhotic group. CRT yielded better overall survival for patients with cancer in the resectable stages in the cirrhotic group compared to surgery (HR, 0.19 [95 % CI, 0.42–0.84]; <em>p</em> = 0.029].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patient with ESCC and cirrhosis, chemoradiotherapy may be a better treatment option than surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000946/pdfft?md5=9753b7c2851cb347005d824441236c0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000946-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的饮酒是肝硬化和食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的一个重要危险因素。有关肝硬化患者 ESCC 治疗的研究很少。本研究旨在分析肝硬化患者 ESCC 的临床疗效。材料和方法回顾性分析了 2009 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间食管癌患者的病历。共纳入479例ESCC患者,分为肝硬化组(69例)和非肝硬化组(410例)。结果肝硬化组比非肝硬化组年轻(中位年龄 64 岁对 69 岁,P = 0.022),男性比例更高(97.1% 对 88.3%,P = 0.042)。肝硬化患者接受手术的几率较低(31.9% 对 47.8%,p = 0.015),并且更有可能不接受积极的癌症治疗(26.1% 对 13.7%,p = 0.010)。肝硬化组的总生存率较低(危险比 [HR],1.41;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.01-1.99;P = 0.045),但 Child-Pugh 分级 A 组患者与非肝硬化组患者之间没有差异(HR,1.04 [95% CI,0.69-1.56];P = 0.864)。肝硬化组的术后死亡率明显更高(27.3% 对 8.7%,P = 0.011)。在同时进行化疗和放疗(CRT)时,肝硬化组的临床完全缓解率(84.2% 对 43.3%,P = 0.004)更高。与手术相比,肝硬化组癌症处于可切除期的患者接受 CRT 治疗后的总生存率更高(HR,0.19 [95 % CI,0.42-0.84];P = 0.029]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis

Purpose

Alcohol consumption is a strong risk factor for both cirrhosis and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Few studies have been conducted on the treatment of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of ESCC in patients with cirrhosis.

Materials and methods

Medical records of patients with esophageal cancer between January 2009 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 479 patients with ESCC were included and divided into cirrhotic (n = 69) and non-cirrhotic (n = 410) groups. Clinical outcomes and survival according to treatment were compared between these groups.

Results

The cirrhotic group was younger (median age 64 years vs. 69 years, p = 0.022) and had a higher proportion of male (97.1 % vs. 88.3 %, p = 0.042) than the non-cirrhotic group. Patients with cirrhosis were less likely to undergo surgery (31.9 % vs. 47.8 %, p = 0.015) and were more likely to receive no active cancer treatment (26.1 % vs. 13.7 %, p = 0.010). Overall survival was lower in the cirrhotic group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.99; p = 0.045), however, no difference was found between Child-Pugh class A patients and those in the non-cirrhotic group (HR, 1.04 [95 % CI, 0.69–1.56]; p = 0.864). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in cirrhotic group (27.3 % vs. 8.7 %, p = 0.011). Upon performing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the clinical complete response rate (84.2 % vs. 43.3 %, p = 0.004) was better in the cirrhotic group. CRT yielded better overall survival for patients with cancer in the resectable stages in the cirrhotic group compared to surgery (HR, 0.19 [95 % CI, 0.42–0.84]; p = 0.029].

Conclusions

In patient with ESCC and cirrhosis, chemoradiotherapy may be a better treatment option than surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1