三维岩层中井眼压缩波和剪切波的数值模拟

IF 2.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Applied Geophysics Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105446
Zhitao Zhang, Zhuwen Wang, Ruiyi Han, Yitong Cui, Xinghua Qi, Yuhang Guo
{"title":"三维岩层中井眼压缩波和剪切波的数值模拟","authors":"Zhitao Zhang,&nbsp;Zhuwen Wang,&nbsp;Ruiyi Han,&nbsp;Yitong Cui,&nbsp;Xinghua Qi,&nbsp;Yuhang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The staggered grid finite difference method (SGFDM) of a monopole source is used to simulate a three-dimensional vug reservoir model and study the effect of acoustic logging responses of different vug models on radial probing depth. The results show that the first arrival of the head wave peak of the compressional wave (P-wave) and the shear wave (S-wave) is unrelated to the radius of the vug, and the amplitude of the head wave peak of the P-wave and S-wave decreases as the vug volume increases. Compared with the volume change of the vug, the radial distance from the vug wall has little influence, while the vertical source distance has large influence on the P-wave and S-wave. When there are multiple vugs in the model, the amplitudes of the P-wave and S-wave head wave peaks change sinusoidally with the angle between the vugs. The ellipsoidal vug model with the same volume has a greater influence on the P-wave and S-wave than the spherical vug model. In the ellipsoidal vug model, the axial vug size has a greater impact on the first arrival of the head wave peak, while the radial vug size significantly influences the amplitude of the head wave peak. Finally, we validate the numerical simulation conclusions by comparing them with actual logging data responses in complex formations, demonstrating the practical value of the elastic wave response simulations for vugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical simulation of borehole compressional wave and shear wave in 3D vug formation\",\"authors\":\"Zhitao Zhang,&nbsp;Zhuwen Wang,&nbsp;Ruiyi Han,&nbsp;Yitong Cui,&nbsp;Xinghua Qi,&nbsp;Yuhang Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The staggered grid finite difference method (SGFDM) of a monopole source is used to simulate a three-dimensional vug reservoir model and study the effect of acoustic logging responses of different vug models on radial probing depth. The results show that the first arrival of the head wave peak of the compressional wave (P-wave) and the shear wave (S-wave) is unrelated to the radius of the vug, and the amplitude of the head wave peak of the P-wave and S-wave decreases as the vug volume increases. Compared with the volume change of the vug, the radial distance from the vug wall has little influence, while the vertical source distance has large influence on the P-wave and S-wave. When there are multiple vugs in the model, the amplitudes of the P-wave and S-wave head wave peaks change sinusoidally with the angle between the vugs. The ellipsoidal vug model with the same volume has a greater influence on the P-wave and S-wave than the spherical vug model. In the ellipsoidal vug model, the axial vug size has a greater impact on the first arrival of the head wave peak, while the radial vug size significantly influences the amplitude of the head wave peak. Finally, we validate the numerical simulation conclusions by comparing them with actual logging data responses in complex formations, demonstrating the practical value of the elastic wave response simulations for vugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985124001629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985124001629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用单极源交错网格有限差分法(SGFDM)模拟三维岩虫储层模型,研究不同岩虫模型的声波测井响应对径向探测深度的影响。结果表明,压缩波(P 波)和剪切波(S 波)头波峰的初至时间与岩浆体半径无关,P 波和 S 波头波峰的振幅随着岩浆体体积的增大而减小。与水槽体积变化相比,水槽壁径向距离对 P 波和 S 波的影响较小,而垂直源距离对 P 波和 S 波的影响较大。当模型中存在多个水口时,P 波和 S 波头波峰的振幅随水口间夹角的变化呈正弦曲线变化。与球形水槽模型相比,相同体积的椭圆形水槽模型对 P 波和 S 波的影响更大。在椭圆形凹槽模型中,轴向凹槽尺寸对顶头波峰的首次到达有较大影响,而径向凹槽尺寸则对顶头波峰的振幅有显著影响。最后,我们将数值模拟结论与复杂地层中的实际测井数据响应进行了比较,从而验证了数值模拟结论,证明了水井弹性波响应模拟的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical simulation of borehole compressional wave and shear wave in 3D vug formation

The staggered grid finite difference method (SGFDM) of a monopole source is used to simulate a three-dimensional vug reservoir model and study the effect of acoustic logging responses of different vug models on radial probing depth. The results show that the first arrival of the head wave peak of the compressional wave (P-wave) and the shear wave (S-wave) is unrelated to the radius of the vug, and the amplitude of the head wave peak of the P-wave and S-wave decreases as the vug volume increases. Compared with the volume change of the vug, the radial distance from the vug wall has little influence, while the vertical source distance has large influence on the P-wave and S-wave. When there are multiple vugs in the model, the amplitudes of the P-wave and S-wave head wave peaks change sinusoidally with the angle between the vugs. The ellipsoidal vug model with the same volume has a greater influence on the P-wave and S-wave than the spherical vug model. In the ellipsoidal vug model, the axial vug size has a greater impact on the first arrival of the head wave peak, while the radial vug size significantly influences the amplitude of the head wave peak. Finally, we validate the numerical simulation conclusions by comparing them with actual logging data responses in complex formations, demonstrating the practical value of the elastic wave response simulations for vugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Journal of Applied Geophysics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Magnetic diagnosis model for heavy metal pollution in beach sediments of Qingdao, China An improved goal-oriented adaptive finite-element method for 3-D direct current resistivity anisotropic forward modeling using nested tetrahedra Deep learning-based geophysical joint inversion using partial channel drop method Advanced predictive modelling of electrical resistivity for geotechnical and geo-environmental applications using machine learning techniques Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1