{"title":"螺旋压缩弹簧的尺寸优化","authors":"Guillaume Cadet, Manuel Paredes","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Helical compression springs are known for their linear force-length relation. However, it is often observed that not ground springs admit a very different mechanical behavior than expected due to the spatial behavior of the end coils. Their behavior is neglected by the standard formula determining the global stiffness of the spring, resulting in errors. Spring makers and customers currently use the standard formulations to design springs. This practice significantly affects the complex spring making process. Operators must experimentally retrieve the desired stiffness by modifying machine inputs, leading to the simultaneous loss of both tuning time and raw materials. The proposed robust and reliable optimization algorithm considers the manufacturing uncertainties and the material variabilities and proposes a target spring design that ensures the highest probability of meeting all constraints. It integrates modern equations for the principal outputs of spring sizing, which are significantly more precise than standard equations, and tends to propose a spring with the lowest possible mass. The algorithm has been successfully confronted with industrial applications. As result, the proposed solution spring sizing is significantly more reliable and robust than the most commonly used software in the spring industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50483,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 105385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized dimensioning of helical compression springs\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Cadet, Manuel Paredes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Helical compression springs are known for their linear force-length relation. However, it is often observed that not ground springs admit a very different mechanical behavior than expected due to the spatial behavior of the end coils. Their behavior is neglected by the standard formula determining the global stiffness of the spring, resulting in errors. Spring makers and customers currently use the standard formulations to design springs. This practice significantly affects the complex spring making process. Operators must experimentally retrieve the desired stiffness by modifying machine inputs, leading to the simultaneous loss of both tuning time and raw materials. The proposed robust and reliable optimization algorithm considers the manufacturing uncertainties and the material variabilities and proposes a target spring design that ensures the highest probability of meeting all constraints. It integrates modern equations for the principal outputs of spring sizing, which are significantly more precise than standard equations, and tends to propose a spring with the lowest possible mass. The algorithm has been successfully confronted with industrial applications. As result, the proposed solution spring sizing is significantly more reliable and robust than the most commonly used software in the spring industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753824001657\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753824001657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimized dimensioning of helical compression springs
Helical compression springs are known for their linear force-length relation. However, it is often observed that not ground springs admit a very different mechanical behavior than expected due to the spatial behavior of the end coils. Their behavior is neglected by the standard formula determining the global stiffness of the spring, resulting in errors. Spring makers and customers currently use the standard formulations to design springs. This practice significantly affects the complex spring making process. Operators must experimentally retrieve the desired stiffness by modifying machine inputs, leading to the simultaneous loss of both tuning time and raw materials. The proposed robust and reliable optimization algorithm considers the manufacturing uncertainties and the material variabilities and proposes a target spring design that ensures the highest probability of meeting all constraints. It integrates modern equations for the principal outputs of spring sizing, which are significantly more precise than standard equations, and tends to propose a spring with the lowest possible mass. The algorithm has been successfully confronted with industrial applications. As result, the proposed solution spring sizing is significantly more reliable and robust than the most commonly used software in the spring industry.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Mechanics endash; A/Solids continues to publish articles in English in all areas of Solid Mechanics from the physical and mathematical basis to materials engineering, technological applications and methods of modern computational mechanics, both pure and applied research.