NeuroIDBench:基于脑电波的身份验证研究方法标准化的开源基准框架

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information Security and Applications Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103832
{"title":"NeuroIDBench:基于脑电波的身份验证研究方法标准化的开源基准框架","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biometric systems based on brain activity have been proposed as an alternative to passwords or to complement current authentication techniques. By leveraging the unique brainwave patterns of individuals, these systems offer the possibility of creating authentication solutions that are resistant to theft, hands-free, accessible, and potentially even revocable. However, despite the growing stream of research in this area, faster advance is hindered by reproducibility problems. Issues such as the lack of standard reporting schemes for performance results and system configuration, or the absence of common evaluation benchmarks, make comparability and proper assessment of different biometric solutions challenging. Further, barriers are erected to future work when, as so often, source code is not published open access. To bridge this gap, we introduce NeuroIDBench, a flexible open source tool to benchmark brainwave-based authentication models. It incorporates nine diverse datasets, implements a comprehensive set of pre-processing parameters and machine learning algorithms, enables testing under two common adversary models (known vs unknown attacker), and allows researchers to generate full performance reports and visualizations. We use NeuroIDBench to investigate the shallow classifiers and deep learning-based approaches proposed in the literature, and to test robustness across multiple sessions. We observe a 37.6% reduction in Equal Error Rate (EER) for unknown attacker scenarios (typically not tested in the literature), and we highlight the importance of session variability to brainwave authentication. All in all, our results demonstrate the viability and relevance of NeuroIDBench in streamlining fair comparisons of algorithms, thereby furthering the advancement of brainwave-based authentication through robust methodological practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001340/pdfft?md5=701ee49e0586c993c5933d0f423680fa&pid=1-s2.0-S2214212624001340-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NeuroIDBench: An open-source benchmark framework for the standardization of methodology in brainwave-based authentication research\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biometric systems based on brain activity have been proposed as an alternative to passwords or to complement current authentication techniques. By leveraging the unique brainwave patterns of individuals, these systems offer the possibility of creating authentication solutions that are resistant to theft, hands-free, accessible, and potentially even revocable. However, despite the growing stream of research in this area, faster advance is hindered by reproducibility problems. Issues such as the lack of standard reporting schemes for performance results and system configuration, or the absence of common evaluation benchmarks, make comparability and proper assessment of different biometric solutions challenging. Further, barriers are erected to future work when, as so often, source code is not published open access. To bridge this gap, we introduce NeuroIDBench, a flexible open source tool to benchmark brainwave-based authentication models. It incorporates nine diverse datasets, implements a comprehensive set of pre-processing parameters and machine learning algorithms, enables testing under two common adversary models (known vs unknown attacker), and allows researchers to generate full performance reports and visualizations. We use NeuroIDBench to investigate the shallow classifiers and deep learning-based approaches proposed in the literature, and to test robustness across multiple sessions. We observe a 37.6% reduction in Equal Error Rate (EER) for unknown attacker scenarios (typically not tested in the literature), and we highlight the importance of session variability to brainwave authentication. All in all, our results demonstrate the viability and relevance of NeuroIDBench in streamlining fair comparisons of algorithms, thereby furthering the advancement of brainwave-based authentication through robust methodological practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Security and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001340/pdfft?md5=701ee49e0586c993c5933d0f423680fa&pid=1-s2.0-S2214212624001340-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Security and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001340\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于大脑活动的生物识别系统已被提出来作为密码的替代品或现有身份验证技术的补充。通过利用个人独特的脑电波模式,这些系统为创建防盗、免提、可访问、甚至可能可撤销的身份验证解决方案提供了可能性。然而,尽管这一领域的研究日益增多,但可重复性问题阻碍了更快的发展。由于缺乏有关性能结果和系统配置的标准报告方案,或缺乏通用的评估基准,因此对不同生物识别解决方案的可比性和适当评估具有挑战性。此外,如果源代码不能公开获取,也会对今后的工作造成障碍。为了弥补这一差距,我们推出了 NeuroIDBench,这是一款灵活的开源工具,用于对基于脑电波的身份验证模型进行基准测试。它整合了九个不同的数据集,实现了一套全面的预处理参数和机器学习算法,可以在两种常见对手模型(已知攻击者与未知攻击者)下进行测试,并允许研究人员生成完整的性能报告和可视化效果。我们使用 NeuroIDBench 研究了文献中提出的浅层分类器和基于深度学习的方法,并测试了跨多个会话的鲁棒性。我们观察到,在未知攻击者场景下(文献中通常未进行测试),等效错误率(EER)降低了 37.6%,我们强调了会话变化对脑电波验证的重要性。总之,我们的结果证明了 NeuroIDBench 在简化算法公平比较方面的可行性和相关性,从而通过稳健的方法论实践进一步推动了基于脑电波的身份验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NeuroIDBench: An open-source benchmark framework for the standardization of methodology in brainwave-based authentication research

Biometric systems based on brain activity have been proposed as an alternative to passwords or to complement current authentication techniques. By leveraging the unique brainwave patterns of individuals, these systems offer the possibility of creating authentication solutions that are resistant to theft, hands-free, accessible, and potentially even revocable. However, despite the growing stream of research in this area, faster advance is hindered by reproducibility problems. Issues such as the lack of standard reporting schemes for performance results and system configuration, or the absence of common evaluation benchmarks, make comparability and proper assessment of different biometric solutions challenging. Further, barriers are erected to future work when, as so often, source code is not published open access. To bridge this gap, we introduce NeuroIDBench, a flexible open source tool to benchmark brainwave-based authentication models. It incorporates nine diverse datasets, implements a comprehensive set of pre-processing parameters and machine learning algorithms, enables testing under two common adversary models (known vs unknown attacker), and allows researchers to generate full performance reports and visualizations. We use NeuroIDBench to investigate the shallow classifiers and deep learning-based approaches proposed in the literature, and to test robustness across multiple sessions. We observe a 37.6% reduction in Equal Error Rate (EER) for unknown attacker scenarios (typically not tested in the literature), and we highlight the importance of session variability to brainwave authentication. All in all, our results demonstrate the viability and relevance of NeuroIDBench in streamlining fair comparisons of algorithms, thereby furthering the advancement of brainwave-based authentication through robust methodological practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Journal of Information Security and Applications Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
206
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Information Security and Applications (JISA) focuses on the original research and practice-driven applications with relevance to information security and applications. JISA provides a common linkage between a vibrant scientific and research community and industry professionals by offering a clear view on modern problems and challenges in information security, as well as identifying promising scientific and "best-practice" solutions. JISA issues offer a balance between original research work and innovative industrial approaches by internationally renowned information security experts and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Secure outsourced decryption for FHE-based privacy-preserving cloud computing An authentication scheme for color images with grayscale invariance and recoverability using image demosaicing On the atout ticket learning problem for neural networks and its application in securing federated learning exchanges Cryptanalysis of Cancelable Biometrics Vault Fine-grained encrypted data aggregation mechanism with fault tolerance in edge-assisted smart grids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1