探索中国大学 EFL 学生对形成性评价的看法:定性研究

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2024.103391
Qiaozhen Yan
{"title":"探索中国大学 EFL 学生对形成性评价的看法:定性研究","authors":"Qiaozhen Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formative assessment (FA) has gained increasing prominence in the field of L2 education. However, how L2 students actually perceive FA has remained underexplored, and this is a critical gap because students' perceptions of assessment can exert a significant impact on their approaches to learning and learning outcomes. Situated within a college English course at a single Tier One university in southwestern China, this study investigated students' perceptions of the benefits and challenges of FA. Five major FA activities were integrated into the course, including writing learning journals, clarifying assessment criteria, conducting peer assessment of course essays, conducting self-assessment of course essays, and providing teacher feedback on course essays. These activities were designed on the basis of Black and Wiliam's (2009) framework for effective formative assessment. Adopting a qualitative approach, the researchers collected semi-structured written reflections from 47 students at the end of the course. The study provides insights into the potential of FA in improving EFL students' self-regulation and English language proficiency, as well as enabling students to develop new perspectives on language assessment. It also reveals an array of challenges faced by the EFL students, pertaining to their own characteristics, the assessment tasks, and school and systemic issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Chinese university EFL students’ perceptions of formative assessment: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Qiaozhen Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2024.103391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Formative assessment (FA) has gained increasing prominence in the field of L2 education. However, how L2 students actually perceive FA has remained underexplored, and this is a critical gap because students' perceptions of assessment can exert a significant impact on their approaches to learning and learning outcomes. Situated within a college English course at a single Tier One university in southwestern China, this study investigated students' perceptions of the benefits and challenges of FA. Five major FA activities were integrated into the course, including writing learning journals, clarifying assessment criteria, conducting peer assessment of course essays, conducting self-assessment of course essays, and providing teacher feedback on course essays. These activities were designed on the basis of Black and Wiliam's (2009) framework for effective formative assessment. Adopting a qualitative approach, the researchers collected semi-structured written reflections from 47 students at the end of the course. The study provides insights into the potential of FA in improving EFL students' self-regulation and English language proficiency, as well as enabling students to develop new perspectives on language assessment. It also reveals an array of challenges faced by the EFL students, pertaining to their own characteristics, the assessment tasks, and school and systemic issues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24001738\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24001738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形成性评价(FA)在第二语言教育领域越来越受到重视。然而,对于学习语言的学生如何看待形成性评价,却一直缺乏深入研究,而这正是一个重要的空白,因为学生对评价的看法会对他们的学习方法和学习成果产生重大影响。本研究以中国西南地区一所一级大学的大学英语课程为背景,调查了学生对 FA 的益处和挑战的看法。在课程中融入了五项主要的FA活动,包括撰写学习日记、明确评估标准、对课程论文进行互评、对课程论文进行自评以及教师对课程论文进行反馈。这些活动是根据 Black 和 Wiliam(2009 年)的有效形成性评价框架设计的。研究人员采用定性方法,收集了 47 名学生在课程结束时的半结构化书面反思。这项研究深入探讨了 FA 在提高 EFL 学生的自我调节能力和英语语言水平方面的潜力,并使学生对语言评估有了新的认识。研究还揭示了 EFL 学生所面临的一系列挑战,涉及他们自身的特点、评估任务以及学校和系统问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Chinese university EFL students’ perceptions of formative assessment: A qualitative study

Formative assessment (FA) has gained increasing prominence in the field of L2 education. However, how L2 students actually perceive FA has remained underexplored, and this is a critical gap because students' perceptions of assessment can exert a significant impact on their approaches to learning and learning outcomes. Situated within a college English course at a single Tier One university in southwestern China, this study investigated students' perceptions of the benefits and challenges of FA. Five major FA activities were integrated into the course, including writing learning journals, clarifying assessment criteria, conducting peer assessment of course essays, conducting self-assessment of course essays, and providing teacher feedback on course essays. These activities were designed on the basis of Black and Wiliam's (2009) framework for effective formative assessment. Adopting a qualitative approach, the researchers collected semi-structured written reflections from 47 students at the end of the course. The study provides insights into the potential of FA in improving EFL students' self-regulation and English language proficiency, as well as enabling students to develop new perspectives on language assessment. It also reveals an array of challenges faced by the EFL students, pertaining to their own characteristics, the assessment tasks, and school and systemic issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
期刊最新文献
Red ginseng polysaccharide promotes ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt pathway through down-regulation of AQP3. Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for predicting the pathological grade of prostate cancer. Correction. WYC-209 inhibited GC malignant progression by down-regulating WNT4 through RARα. Efficacy and pharmacodynamic effect of anti-CD73 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in combination with cytotoxic therapy: observations from mouse tumor models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1