认可机制及其对工作幸福感的影响如何塑造包容性氛围

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1108/jmd-02-2023-0042
Romuald Grouille, Clément Desgourdes, Daniel Leroy
{"title":"认可机制及其对工作幸福感的影响如何塑造包容性氛围","authors":"Romuald Grouille, Clément Desgourdes, Daniel Leroy","doi":"10.1108/jmd-02-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to explore the relationships between recognition, inclusion, and well-being at work. Inclusion involves integrating individuals within a group while recognizing their unique skills and need for belonging. Recognition and inclusion are sources of well-being at work.Design/methodology/approachWe used a qualitative methodology based on a structural approach to investigate the social representations of 1,611 employees of a public organization located in the Centre-Val de Loire region of France.FindingsOur results suggest that recognition is a central mechanism of inclusion, primarily manifested through satisfaction of the individual’s need to belong. We conclude with a proposed heuristic schema of the connections between the constructs studied.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper proposes a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by addressing the knowledge gap in the literature concerning the role of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and optimizing well-being at work. This is done using qualitative methodology, drawing on the Dazibao framework of data collection.Originality/valueBringing a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by helping to fill the knowledge gap relating to the place of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and well-being at work. It does so through a qualitative methodology based on the Dazibao framework of data collection.","PeriodicalId":48006,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the mechanism of recognition and its effects on well-being at work can shape an inclusive climate\",\"authors\":\"Romuald Grouille, Clément Desgourdes, Daniel Leroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmd-02-2023-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to explore the relationships between recognition, inclusion, and well-being at work. Inclusion involves integrating individuals within a group while recognizing their unique skills and need for belonging. Recognition and inclusion are sources of well-being at work.Design/methodology/approachWe used a qualitative methodology based on a structural approach to investigate the social representations of 1,611 employees of a public organization located in the Centre-Val de Loire region of France.FindingsOur results suggest that recognition is a central mechanism of inclusion, primarily manifested through satisfaction of the individual’s need to belong. We conclude with a proposed heuristic schema of the connections between the constructs studied.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper proposes a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by addressing the knowledge gap in the literature concerning the role of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and optimizing well-being at work. This is done using qualitative methodology, drawing on the Dazibao framework of data collection.Originality/valueBringing a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by helping to fill the knowledge gap relating to the place of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and well-being at work. It does so through a qualitative methodology based on the Dazibao framework of data collection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-02-2023-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-02-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨工作中的认可、包容和幸福感之间的关系。包容涉及将个人融入群体,同时承认他们的独特技能和对归属感的需求。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,认可是包容的核心机制,主要通过满足个人的归属需求来体现。最后,我们就所研究的构建之间的联系提出了一个启发式模式。研究局限性/影响本文为 Shore 等人(2018 年)的研究提出了一个新的视角,解决了文献中关于认可在决定包容性氛围和优化工作幸福感方面的作用的知识空白。本文采用定性方法,借鉴大智博数据收集框架,为肖尔等人(2018)的研究工作提供了一个新视角,有助于填补有关认可在决定包容性氛围和工作幸福感中的作用的知识空白。它通过基于大智博数据收集框架的定性方法来实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the mechanism of recognition and its effects on well-being at work can shape an inclusive climate
PurposeThis study aims to explore the relationships between recognition, inclusion, and well-being at work. Inclusion involves integrating individuals within a group while recognizing their unique skills and need for belonging. Recognition and inclusion are sources of well-being at work.Design/methodology/approachWe used a qualitative methodology based on a structural approach to investigate the social representations of 1,611 employees of a public organization located in the Centre-Val de Loire region of France.FindingsOur results suggest that recognition is a central mechanism of inclusion, primarily manifested through satisfaction of the individual’s need to belong. We conclude with a proposed heuristic schema of the connections between the constructs studied.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper proposes a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by addressing the knowledge gap in the literature concerning the role of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and optimizing well-being at work. This is done using qualitative methodology, drawing on the Dazibao framework of data collection.Originality/valueBringing a new perspective to the work of Shore et al. (2018) by helping to fill the knowledge gap relating to the place of recognition in determining an inclusive climate and well-being at work. It does so through a qualitative methodology based on the Dazibao framework of data collection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: ■Competence-based management development ■Developing leadership skills ■Developing women for management ■Global management ■The new technology of management development The Journal of Management Development draws together the thinking and research relating to the role played by managers in their immediate environment, and the ways in which they can widen their responsibilities to take on larger roles. Many companies now appreciate that investment in management development helps to reduce costs, increase sales and improve productivity - so it"s well worth investigating.
期刊最新文献
Evolving needs of learners and role of artificial intelligence (AI) in training and development (T&D): T&D professionals' perspective Employee disengagement: the catalytic role of leader-induced defensive cognitions and perceptual politics Competencies displayed by multinational corporation senior managers in critical business situations Connection is a power: exploring the dynamic interaction between social and psychological capital in fostering innovative behavior The “active struggle” of the hybrid middle manager: exploring the notion of ethical resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1