传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划中脑卒中住院康复的住院时间的地区差异

D. Luo, M. Ouayogodé, John Mullahy, Ying (Jessica) Cao
{"title":"传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划中脑卒中住院康复的住院时间的地区差异","authors":"D. Luo, M. Ouayogodé, John Mullahy, Ying (Jessica) Cao","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Regional variation in healthcare use threatens efficient and equitable resource allocation. Within the Medicare program, variation in care delivery may differ between centrally administered traditional Medicare (TM) and privately managed Medicare Advantage (MA) plans which rely on different strategies to control care utilization. As MA enrollment grows, it is particularly important for program design and long-term healthcare equity to understand regional variation between TM and MA plans. This study examined regional variation in length of stay (LOS) for stroke inpatient rehabilitation between TM and MA plans in 2019 and how that changed in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that MA plans had larger across-region variations than TM (standard deviation (SD)=0.26 vs. 0.24 days, 11% relative difference). In 2020, across-region variation for MA further enlarged but the trend for TM stayed relatively stable. Market competition among all inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) within a region was associated with a moderate increase in within-region variation of LOS (elasticity=0.46). Policies reducing administrative variation across MA plans or increasing regional market competition among IRFs can mitigate regional variation in healthcare use.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Variation in Length of Stay for Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage\",\"authors\":\"D. Luo, M. Ouayogodé, John Mullahy, Ying (Jessica) Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Regional variation in healthcare use threatens efficient and equitable resource allocation. Within the Medicare program, variation in care delivery may differ between centrally administered traditional Medicare (TM) and privately managed Medicare Advantage (MA) plans which rely on different strategies to control care utilization. As MA enrollment grows, it is particularly important for program design and long-term healthcare equity to understand regional variation between TM and MA plans. This study examined regional variation in length of stay (LOS) for stroke inpatient rehabilitation between TM and MA plans in 2019 and how that changed in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that MA plans had larger across-region variations than TM (standard deviation (SD)=0.26 vs. 0.24 days, 11% relative difference). In 2020, across-region variation for MA further enlarged but the trend for TM stayed relatively stable. Market competition among all inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) within a region was associated with a moderate increase in within-region variation of LOS (elasticity=0.46). Policies reducing administrative variation across MA plans or increasing regional market competition among IRFs can mitigate regional variation in healthcare use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健使用方面的地区差异威胁着高效、公平的资源分配。在医疗保险计划中,中央管理的传统医疗保险(TM)和私人管理的医疗保险优势计划(MA)在提供医疗服务方面可能存在差异,后者依靠不同的策略来控制医疗服务的使用。随着医疗保险注册人数的增加,了解传统医疗保险和医疗保险计划之间的地区差异对于计划设计和长期医疗保健公平性尤为重要。本研究考察了 2019 年 TM 计划和 MA 计划在中风住院康复的住院时间(LOS)方面的地区差异,以及在 2020 年(COVID-19 大流行的第一年)这一差异的变化情况。结果显示,MA 计划的跨地区差异大于 TM 计划(标准差 (SD)=0.26 对 0.24 天,相对差异为 11%)。2020 年,医疗保险的跨地区差异进一步扩大,但医疗保险的趋势保持相对稳定。区域内所有住院康复设施(IRF)之间的市场竞争与 LOS 区域内差异的适度增加有关(弹性=0.46)。减少医疗保险计划之间的管理差异或增加地区内住院康复设施之间的市场竞争的政策可以缓解医疗保健使用的地区差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional Variation in Length of Stay for Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage
Regional variation in healthcare use threatens efficient and equitable resource allocation. Within the Medicare program, variation in care delivery may differ between centrally administered traditional Medicare (TM) and privately managed Medicare Advantage (MA) plans which rely on different strategies to control care utilization. As MA enrollment grows, it is particularly important for program design and long-term healthcare equity to understand regional variation between TM and MA plans. This study examined regional variation in length of stay (LOS) for stroke inpatient rehabilitation between TM and MA plans in 2019 and how that changed in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that MA plans had larger across-region variations than TM (standard deviation (SD)=0.26 vs. 0.24 days, 11% relative difference). In 2020, across-region variation for MA further enlarged but the trend for TM stayed relatively stable. Market competition among all inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) within a region was associated with a moderate increase in within-region variation of LOS (elasticity=0.46). Policies reducing administrative variation across MA plans or increasing regional market competition among IRFs can mitigate regional variation in healthcare use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Variation in Shortfalls of Dementia Specialists in the U.S. Biosimilar underutilization alone does not foretell a broken biologics market Regional Variation in Length of Stay for Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Who Participates in Value-Based Care Models? Physician Characteristics and Implications for Value-based Care Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Outcomes of Post-Acute Nursing Home Care Among Patients with Dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1