Michael J. Williams, Sol Atienza, Renee H. Aranda, Kayleigh B. Flint, S. Sana, S. C. Medlin, Zartash Gul, Federico A. Sanchez, Michael A. Thompson
{"title":"大型社区医疗系统中新确诊的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者使用中枢神经系统预防药物的情况","authors":"Michael J. Williams, Sol Atienza, Renee H. Aranda, Kayleigh B. Flint, S. Sana, S. C. Medlin, Zartash Gul, Federico A. Sanchez, Michael A. Thompson","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the form of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and/or high-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate. CNS-IPI scores were calculated for all patients who received CNS prophylaxis or those who experienced CNS disease. Long-term outcomes at five years from diagnosis included CNS progression/relapse and survival. Results Of 234 patients who met criteria, 20 (8.6%) received either IV methotrexate or IT chemotherapy; most received IT methotrexate. No patients in the IT prophylaxis group developed CNS disease, while two of eight IV methotrexate patients experienced CNS disease involvement. The incidence of CNS progression was 3.7% in the no prophylaxis group and 10% in those who received prophylaxis. Conclusions This study revealed low utilization of CNS prophylaxis and CNS-IPI documentation in a community hospital system. Given large differences between groups, claims of CNS prophylaxis efficacy are unable to be made. CNS relapse rates were consistent with existing literature and promote continued evaluation of the utility of current CNS prophylaxis approaches in DLBCL. New unambiguously effective therapeutic approaches are needed and may encourage a higher rate of standardized use. ( J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024;11:81-87.)","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"45 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Nervous System Prophylaxis Utilization in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Within a Large Community Health System\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Williams, Sol Atienza, Renee H. Aranda, Kayleigh B. Flint, S. Sana, S. C. Medlin, Zartash Gul, Federico A. Sanchez, Michael A. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.2060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the form of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and/or high-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate. CNS-IPI scores were calculated for all patients who received CNS prophylaxis or those who experienced CNS disease. Long-term outcomes at five years from diagnosis included CNS progression/relapse and survival. Results Of 234 patients who met criteria, 20 (8.6%) received either IV methotrexate or IT chemotherapy; most received IT methotrexate. No patients in the IT prophylaxis group developed CNS disease, while two of eight IV methotrexate patients experienced CNS disease involvement. The incidence of CNS progression was 3.7% in the no prophylaxis group and 10% in those who received prophylaxis. Conclusions This study revealed low utilization of CNS prophylaxis and CNS-IPI documentation in a community hospital system. Given large differences between groups, claims of CNS prophylaxis efficacy are unable to be made. CNS relapse rates were consistent with existing literature and promote continued evaluation of the utility of current CNS prophylaxis approaches in DLBCL. New unambiguously effective therapeutic approaches are needed and may encourage a higher rate of standardized use. ( J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024;11:81-87.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"45 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鞘内化疗和/或大剂量静脉注射甲氨蝶呤。对所有接受中枢神经系统预防治疗或出现中枢神经系统疾病的患者计算中枢神经系统-IPI评分。诊断后五年的长期结果包括中枢神经系统疾病进展/复发和存活率。结果 在符合标准的 234 名患者中,20 人(8.6%)接受了静脉注射甲氨蝶呤或 IT 化疗;大多数人接受了 IT 甲氨蝶呤。IT预防组没有患者出现中枢神经系统疾病,而8名静脉注射甲氨蝶呤的患者中有2名出现中枢神经系统疾病。未接受预防治疗组的中枢神经系统疾病进展发生率为 3.7%,而接受预防治疗组的中枢神经系统疾病进展发生率为 10%。结论 本研究显示,在社区医院系统中,中枢神经系统预防和中枢神经系统 IPI 文件的使用率较低。由于各组之间存在巨大差异,因此不能断言中枢神经系统预防措施具有疗效。中枢神经系统复发率与现有文献一致,因此需要继续评估当前中枢神经系统预防方法在DLBCL中的效用。需要新的明确有效的治疗方法,并鼓励提高标准化使用率。( J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024;11:81-87.)
Central Nervous System Prophylaxis Utilization in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Within a Large Community Health System
the form of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and/or high-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate. CNS-IPI scores were calculated for all patients who received CNS prophylaxis or those who experienced CNS disease. Long-term outcomes at five years from diagnosis included CNS progression/relapse and survival. Results Of 234 patients who met criteria, 20 (8.6%) received either IV methotrexate or IT chemotherapy; most received IT methotrexate. No patients in the IT prophylaxis group developed CNS disease, while two of eight IV methotrexate patients experienced CNS disease involvement. The incidence of CNS progression was 3.7% in the no prophylaxis group and 10% in those who received prophylaxis. Conclusions This study revealed low utilization of CNS prophylaxis and CNS-IPI documentation in a community hospital system. Given large differences between groups, claims of CNS prophylaxis efficacy are unable to be made. CNS relapse rates were consistent with existing literature and promote continued evaluation of the utility of current CNS prophylaxis approaches in DLBCL. New unambiguously effective therapeutic approaches are needed and may encourage a higher rate of standardized use. ( J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024;11:81-87.)
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.