腹部手术的快速疗效(文献综述)

K. Ysmaiylov, K. Tashiev, S. Abdiraimuulu, T. Abdyldaev
{"title":"腹部手术的快速疗效(文献综述)","authors":"K. Ysmaiylov, K. Tashiev, S. Abdiraimuulu, T. Abdyldaev","doi":"10.33619/2414-2948/104/28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to evaluate the literature on fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LRYGB and LAGB) to determine its feasibility and safety. Articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library discussing next-day discharge for LRYGB and same-day discharge for LAGB were analyzed. The review included 13 studies with evidence levels of 3b or 4, comprising seven studies on LAGB, five on LRYGB, and one on both. The next-day discharge rate for LRYGB ranged from 81% to 100%, and the same-day discharge rate for LAGB ranged from 76% to 98%. Complication, readmission, and mortality rates were comparable to conventional care. The results indicate that fast-track management of LRYGB and LAGB is feasible with careful patient selection and preparation in high-volume centers, potentially offering cost benefits. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach outside specialized bariatric units.","PeriodicalId":505704,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science and Practice","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast-track Effectiveness in Abdominal Surgery (Literature Review)\",\"authors\":\"K. Ysmaiylov, K. Tashiev, S. Abdiraimuulu, T. Abdyldaev\",\"doi\":\"10.33619/2414-2948/104/28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to evaluate the literature on fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LRYGB and LAGB) to determine its feasibility and safety. Articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library discussing next-day discharge for LRYGB and same-day discharge for LAGB were analyzed. The review included 13 studies with evidence levels of 3b or 4, comprising seven studies on LAGB, five on LRYGB, and one on both. The next-day discharge rate for LRYGB ranged from 81% to 100%, and the same-day discharge rate for LAGB ranged from 76% to 98%. Complication, readmission, and mortality rates were comparable to conventional care. The results indicate that fast-track management of LRYGB and LAGB is feasible with careful patient selection and preparation in high-volume centers, potentially offering cost benefits. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach outside specialized bariatric units.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/104/28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/104/28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在评估有关快速腹腔镜减肥手术(LRYGB 和 LAGB)的文献,以确定其可行性和安全性。研究分析了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中讨论 LRYGB 次日出院和 LAGB 当日出院的文章。该综述包括 13 项证据等级为 3b 或 4 的研究,其中 7 项是关于 LAGB 的研究,5 项是关于 LRYGB 的研究,1 项是关于两者的研究。LRYGB 的次日出院率从 81% 到 100% 不等,LAGB 的当日出院率从 76% 到 98% 不等。并发症、再入院率和死亡率与常规治疗相当。研究结果表明,在高流量中心,只要仔细选择患者并做好准备,LRYGB 和 LAGB 的快速通道管理是可行的,并可能带来成本效益。不过,还需要进一步的研究来证实这种方法在减肥专科之外的安全性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fast-track Effectiveness in Abdominal Surgery (Literature Review)
The study aimed to evaluate the literature on fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LRYGB and LAGB) to determine its feasibility and safety. Articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library discussing next-day discharge for LRYGB and same-day discharge for LAGB were analyzed. The review included 13 studies with evidence levels of 3b or 4, comprising seven studies on LAGB, five on LRYGB, and one on both. The next-day discharge rate for LRYGB ranged from 81% to 100%, and the same-day discharge rate for LAGB ranged from 76% to 98%. Complication, readmission, and mortality rates were comparable to conventional care. The results indicate that fast-track management of LRYGB and LAGB is feasible with careful patient selection and preparation in high-volume centers, potentially offering cost benefits. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach outside specialized bariatric units.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research and Development of Obtaining Scandium from Waste Cake by Aluminothermal Method Genesis of the Development of Political Rights and Freedoms of Human and Citizens Development of a Prototype Hydraulic Damping Device for Hot Water Heating Circuit in Pulse Mode Diagnostic Scale for Acute Appendicitis to Prevent General Peritonitis in Children The First Record of Dysdera armenica Charitonov, 1956 (Araneae: Dysderidae) in Azerbaijan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1