利用人工智能预测脑磁共振成像中的胎儿妊娠年龄:三种生物识别技术的比较研究

Farzan Vahedifard, Xuchu Liu, Kranthi K. Marathu, H. Ai, M. Supanich, Mehmet Kocak, Seth Adler, Shehbaz M. Ansari, Melih Akyuz, Jubril O. Adepoju, Sharon Byrd
{"title":"利用人工智能预测脑磁共振成像中的胎儿妊娠年龄:三种生物识别技术的比较研究","authors":"Farzan Vahedifard, Xuchu Liu, Kranthi K. Marathu, H. Ai, M. Supanich, Mehmet Kocak, Seth Adler, Shehbaz M. Ansari, Melih Akyuz, Jubril O. Adepoju, Sharon Byrd","doi":"10.3390/reprodmed5030012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately predicting a fetus’s gestational age (GA) is crucial in prenatal care. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict GA using biometric measurements from fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the significance of using different reference standards for interpreting GA predictions. Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), fronto-occipital diameter (FOD), and head circumference (HC) were obtained from 52 normal fetal MRI cases from Rush University. Both manual and AI-based methods were utilized, and comparisons were made using three reference standards (Garel, Freq, and Bio). The AI model showed a strong correlation with manual measurements, particularly for HC, which exhibited the highest correlation with actual values. Differences between GA predictions and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) records varied by reference, ranging from 0.47 to 2.17 weeks for BPD, 0.46 to 2.26 weeks for FOD, and 0.75 to 1.74 weeks for HC. Pearson correlation coefficients between PACS records and GA predictions exceeded 0.97 across all references. In conclusion, the AI model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting GA from fetal brain MRI measurements. This approach offers improved accuracy and convenience over manual methods, highlighting the potential of AI in enhancing prenatal care through precise GA estimation.","PeriodicalId":516007,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetal Gestational Age Prediction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Three Biometric Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Farzan Vahedifard, Xuchu Liu, Kranthi K. Marathu, H. Ai, M. Supanich, Mehmet Kocak, Seth Adler, Shehbaz M. Ansari, Melih Akyuz, Jubril O. Adepoju, Sharon Byrd\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/reprodmed5030012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurately predicting a fetus’s gestational age (GA) is crucial in prenatal care. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict GA using biometric measurements from fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the significance of using different reference standards for interpreting GA predictions. Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), fronto-occipital diameter (FOD), and head circumference (HC) were obtained from 52 normal fetal MRI cases from Rush University. Both manual and AI-based methods were utilized, and comparisons were made using three reference standards (Garel, Freq, and Bio). The AI model showed a strong correlation with manual measurements, particularly for HC, which exhibited the highest correlation with actual values. Differences between GA predictions and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) records varied by reference, ranging from 0.47 to 2.17 weeks for BPD, 0.46 to 2.26 weeks for FOD, and 0.75 to 1.74 weeks for HC. Pearson correlation coefficients between PACS records and GA predictions exceeded 0.97 across all references. In conclusion, the AI model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting GA from fetal brain MRI measurements. This approach offers improved accuracy and convenience over manual methods, highlighting the potential of AI in enhancing prenatal care through precise GA estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确预测胎儿的胎龄(GA)在产前护理中至关重要。本研究旨在开发一种人工智能(AI)模型,利用胎儿脑磁共振成像(MRI)的生物测量数据预测胎龄。我们评估了使用不同参考标准解释 GA 预测的意义。我们从拉什大学的 52 个正常胎儿 MRI 病例中获得了双顶径 (BPD)、前枕径 (FOD) 和头围 (HC) 的测量值。该研究同时采用了手动和人工智能方法,并使用三种参考标准(Garel、Freq 和 Bio)进行了比较。人工智能模型与人工测量结果有很强的相关性,尤其是 HC,与实际值的相关性最高。GA 预测值与图片存档和通信系统 (PACS) 记录之间的差异因参照物而异,BPD 为 0.47 到 2.17 周,FOD 为 0.46 到 2.26 周,HC 为 0.75 到 1.74 周。在所有参考文献中,PACS 记录和 GA 预测之间的皮尔逊相关系数都超过了 0.97。总之,人工智能模型在根据胎儿脑部核磁共振成像测量结果预测GA方面表现出很高的准确性。这种方法比人工方法更准确、更方便,突出了人工智能通过精确预测GA来提高产前保健水平的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fetal Gestational Age Prediction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Three Biometric Techniques
Accurately predicting a fetus’s gestational age (GA) is crucial in prenatal care. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict GA using biometric measurements from fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the significance of using different reference standards for interpreting GA predictions. Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), fronto-occipital diameter (FOD), and head circumference (HC) were obtained from 52 normal fetal MRI cases from Rush University. Both manual and AI-based methods were utilized, and comparisons were made using three reference standards (Garel, Freq, and Bio). The AI model showed a strong correlation with manual measurements, particularly for HC, which exhibited the highest correlation with actual values. Differences between GA predictions and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) records varied by reference, ranging from 0.47 to 2.17 weeks for BPD, 0.46 to 2.26 weeks for FOD, and 0.75 to 1.74 weeks for HC. Pearson correlation coefficients between PACS records and GA predictions exceeded 0.97 across all references. In conclusion, the AI model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting GA from fetal brain MRI measurements. This approach offers improved accuracy and convenience over manual methods, highlighting the potential of AI in enhancing prenatal care through precise GA estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal Gestational Age Prediction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Three Biometric Techniques Temporal Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Method of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (mi-PGT-A) in Human Embryos Prevalence of Pathogenic Microbes within the Endometrium in Normal Weight vs. Obese Women with Infertility A Comparison of the Frequency of Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 Using Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing According to Diminished vs. Normal Egg Reserve and Age Kinetic Energy and the Free Energy Principle in the Birth of Human Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1