A. Druye, D. F. Agyare, William Akoto-Buabeng, Jethro Zutah, Frank Odonkor Offei, Bernard Nabe, G. O. Ofori, Amidu Alhassan, Benjamin Kofi Anumel, Godfred Cobbinah, Susanna Aba Abraham, Mustapha Amoadu, J. Hagan
{"title":"医护人员对镰状细胞病的认识、态度、评估实践和管理:元汇总综述","authors":"A. Druye, D. F. Agyare, William Akoto-Buabeng, Jethro Zutah, Frank Odonkor Offei, Bernard Nabe, G. O. Ofori, Amidu Alhassan, Benjamin Kofi Anumel, Godfred Cobbinah, Susanna Aba Abraham, Mustapha Amoadu, J. Hagan","doi":"10.3390/diseases12070156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) presents significant health challenges globally. Despite its prevalence in diverse geographical regions, there is a paucity of literature synthesizing evidence on healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward SCD assessment and management. This meta-aggregative review systematically examined and synthesized existing qualitative research to elucidate healthcare professionals’ KAP regarding SCD assessment and management. Methods: This meta-aggregative review followed Aromataris and Pearson’s guidelines and the PRISMA framework for systematic review reporting. The search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Web of Science, Google Scholar, Dimensions AI, and HINARI. Quality appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Results: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) demonstrate varying levels of KAP toward SCD assessment and management. Studies reveal low-to-moderate levels of general knowledge among HCPs, with nurses often exhibiting poorer understanding than physicians. Deficiencies in awareness of specific interventions, such as chemoprophylaxis and prenatal diagnosis, are noted, along with gaps in SCD assessment and diagnosis, particularly in pain management and premarital screening. Attitudes toward SCD patients vary, and practices reveal inconsistencies and deficiencies, including inadequate nutritional counseling and barriers in emergency departments. However, interventions aimed at improving HCPs’ KAP show promise in enhancing understanding and attitudes toward SCD, suggesting potential avenues for improvement. Conclusions: Educational initiatives targeted at both student nurses and practicing healthcare providers, coupled with the implementation of standardized protocols and guidelines, can enhance knowledge acquisition and promote consistent, high-quality care delivery. Future studies should improve the quality of their methods in this area of study.","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge, Attitude, Practices of Assessment, and Management of Sickle-Cell Disease: A Meta-Aggregative Review\",\"authors\":\"A. Druye, D. F. Agyare, William Akoto-Buabeng, Jethro Zutah, Frank Odonkor Offei, Bernard Nabe, G. O. Ofori, Amidu Alhassan, Benjamin Kofi Anumel, Godfred Cobbinah, Susanna Aba Abraham, Mustapha Amoadu, J. Hagan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases12070156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) presents significant health challenges globally. Despite its prevalence in diverse geographical regions, there is a paucity of literature synthesizing evidence on healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward SCD assessment and management. This meta-aggregative review systematically examined and synthesized existing qualitative research to elucidate healthcare professionals’ KAP regarding SCD assessment and management. Methods: This meta-aggregative review followed Aromataris and Pearson’s guidelines and the PRISMA framework for systematic review reporting. The search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Web of Science, Google Scholar, Dimensions AI, and HINARI. Quality appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Results: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) demonstrate varying levels of KAP toward SCD assessment and management. Studies reveal low-to-moderate levels of general knowledge among HCPs, with nurses often exhibiting poorer understanding than physicians. Deficiencies in awareness of specific interventions, such as chemoprophylaxis and prenatal diagnosis, are noted, along with gaps in SCD assessment and diagnosis, particularly in pain management and premarital screening. Attitudes toward SCD patients vary, and practices reveal inconsistencies and deficiencies, including inadequate nutritional counseling and barriers in emergency departments. However, interventions aimed at improving HCPs’ KAP show promise in enhancing understanding and attitudes toward SCD, suggesting potential avenues for improvement. Conclusions: Educational initiatives targeted at both student nurses and practicing healthcare providers, coupled with the implementation of standardized protocols and guidelines, can enhance knowledge acquisition and promote consistent, high-quality care delivery. Future studies should improve the quality of their methods in this area of study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:背景:镰状细胞病(SCD)是全球面临的重大健康挑战。尽管镰状细胞病在不同的地理区域都很普遍,但有关医护人员对 SCD 评估和管理的知识、态度和实践 (KAP) 的文献综述却很少。本荟萃综述系统地检查和综合了现有的定性研究,以阐明医疗保健专业人员对 SCD 评估和管理的 KAP。方法:本综述遵循 Aromataris 和 Pearson 的指南以及系统综述报告的 PRISMA 框架。搜索范围包括 Scopus、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Web of Science、Google Scholar、Dimensions AI 和 HINARI。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的工具进行了质量评估。结果医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对 SCD 评估和管理表现出不同程度的 KAP。研究显示,医疗保健专业人员的常识水平处于中低水平,其中护士的理解能力往往低于医生。对特定干预措施(如化学预防和产前诊断)的认识存在不足,同时在 SCD 评估和诊断方面也存在差距,尤其是在疼痛管理和婚前筛查方面。人们对 SCD 患者的态度各不相同,在实践中也暴露出不一致和不足之处,包括营养咨询不足和急诊科的障碍。然而,旨在改善 HCPs KAP 的干预措施在提高对 SCD 的理解和态度方面显示出了希望,这也为改进工作提供了潜在的途径。结论:针对护士学生和执业医护人员的教育措施,再加上标准化协议和指南的实施,可以增强知识的获取并促进一致、高质量的护理服务。未来的研究应提高这方面研究方法的质量。
Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge, Attitude, Practices of Assessment, and Management of Sickle-Cell Disease: A Meta-Aggregative Review
Abstract: Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) presents significant health challenges globally. Despite its prevalence in diverse geographical regions, there is a paucity of literature synthesizing evidence on healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward SCD assessment and management. This meta-aggregative review systematically examined and synthesized existing qualitative research to elucidate healthcare professionals’ KAP regarding SCD assessment and management. Methods: This meta-aggregative review followed Aromataris and Pearson’s guidelines and the PRISMA framework for systematic review reporting. The search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Web of Science, Google Scholar, Dimensions AI, and HINARI. Quality appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Results: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) demonstrate varying levels of KAP toward SCD assessment and management. Studies reveal low-to-moderate levels of general knowledge among HCPs, with nurses often exhibiting poorer understanding than physicians. Deficiencies in awareness of specific interventions, such as chemoprophylaxis and prenatal diagnosis, are noted, along with gaps in SCD assessment and diagnosis, particularly in pain management and premarital screening. Attitudes toward SCD patients vary, and practices reveal inconsistencies and deficiencies, including inadequate nutritional counseling and barriers in emergency departments. However, interventions aimed at improving HCPs’ KAP show promise in enhancing understanding and attitudes toward SCD, suggesting potential avenues for improvement. Conclusions: Educational initiatives targeted at both student nurses and practicing healthcare providers, coupled with the implementation of standardized protocols and guidelines, can enhance knowledge acquisition and promote consistent, high-quality care delivery. Future studies should improve the quality of their methods in this area of study.