加强程序性技能培训中的反馈吸收和自我调节学习

Ignacio Villagrán, Rocío Hernández, Gregory Schuit, Andrés Neyem, Javiera Fuentes, Loreto Larrondo, Elisa Margozzini, María T. Hurtado, Zoe Iriarte, Constanza Miranda, Julián Varas, Isabel Hilliger
{"title":"加强程序性技能培训中的反馈吸收和自我调节学习","authors":"Ignacio Villagrán, Rocío Hernández, Gregory Schuit, Andrés Neyem, Javiera Fuentes, Loreto Larrondo, Elisa Margozzini, María T. Hurtado, Zoe Iriarte, Constanza Miranda, Julián Varas, Isabel Hilliger","doi":"10.18608/jla.2024.8195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote technology has been widely incorporated into health professions education. For procedural skills training, effective feedback and reflection processes are required. Consequently, supporting a self-regulated learning (SRL) approach with learning analytics dashboards (LADs) has proven beneficial in online environments. Despite the potential of LADs, understanding their design to enhance SRL and provide useful feedback remains a significant challenge. Focusing on LAD design, implementation, and evaluation, the study followed a mixed-methods two-phase design-based research approach. The study used a triangulation methodology of qualitative interviews and SRL and sensemaking questionnaires to comprehensively understand the LAD’s effectiveness and student SRL and feedback uptake strategies during remote procedural skills training. Initial findings revealed the value students placed on performance visualization and peer comparison despite some challenges in LAD design and usability. The study also identified the prominent adoption of SRL strategies such as help-seeking, elaboration, and strategic planning. Sensemaking results showed the value of personalized performance metrics and planning resources in the LAD and recommendations to improve reflection and feedback uptake. Subsequent findings suggested that SRL levels significantly predicted the levels of sensemaking. The students valued the LAD as a tool for supporting feedback uptake and strategic planning, demonstrating the potential for enhancing procedural skills learning.","PeriodicalId":506271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Analytics","volume":"67 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Feedback Uptake and Self-Regulated Learning in Procedural Skills Training\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Villagrán, Rocío Hernández, Gregory Schuit, Andrés Neyem, Javiera Fuentes, Loreto Larrondo, Elisa Margozzini, María T. Hurtado, Zoe Iriarte, Constanza Miranda, Julián Varas, Isabel Hilliger\",\"doi\":\"10.18608/jla.2024.8195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Remote technology has been widely incorporated into health professions education. For procedural skills training, effective feedback and reflection processes are required. Consequently, supporting a self-regulated learning (SRL) approach with learning analytics dashboards (LADs) has proven beneficial in online environments. Despite the potential of LADs, understanding their design to enhance SRL and provide useful feedback remains a significant challenge. Focusing on LAD design, implementation, and evaluation, the study followed a mixed-methods two-phase design-based research approach. The study used a triangulation methodology of qualitative interviews and SRL and sensemaking questionnaires to comprehensively understand the LAD’s effectiveness and student SRL and feedback uptake strategies during remote procedural skills training. Initial findings revealed the value students placed on performance visualization and peer comparison despite some challenges in LAD design and usability. The study also identified the prominent adoption of SRL strategies such as help-seeking, elaboration, and strategic planning. Sensemaking results showed the value of personalized performance metrics and planning resources in the LAD and recommendations to improve reflection and feedback uptake. Subsequent findings suggested that SRL levels significantly predicted the levels of sensemaking. The students valued the LAD as a tool for supporting feedback uptake and strategic planning, demonstrating the potential for enhancing procedural skills learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Learning Analytics\",\"volume\":\"67 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Learning Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程技术已被广泛纳入卫生专业教育。程序性技能培训需要有效的反馈和反思过程。因此,利用学习分析仪表板(LADs)支持自我调节学习(SRL)方法已被证明有利于在线环境。尽管 LADs 潜力巨大,但如何设计 LADs 以加强自律学习并提供有用的反馈仍是一项重大挑战。本研究以 LAD 的设计、实施和评估为重点,采用了基于设计的两阶段混合研究方法。研究采用了定性访谈、自学能力和感性认识问卷的三角测量方法,以全面了解 LAD 的有效性以及远程程序技能培训期间学生的自学能力和反馈吸收策略。初步研究结果表明,尽管在 LAD 设计和可用性方面存在一些挑战,但学生对成绩可视化和同伴比较的重视程度很高。研究还发现,寻求帮助、详细说明和战略规划等自律学习策略得到了广泛采用。感性认识的结果显示了 LAD 中个性化绩效指标和规划资源的价值,并提出了改进反思和反馈吸收的建议。随后的研究结果表明,自学能力水平对感性认识水平有显著的预测作用。学生们重视 LAD,将其视为支持反馈吸收和战略规划的工具,这显示了 LAD 在加强程序性技能学习方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Feedback Uptake and Self-Regulated Learning in Procedural Skills Training
Remote technology has been widely incorporated into health professions education. For procedural skills training, effective feedback and reflection processes are required. Consequently, supporting a self-regulated learning (SRL) approach with learning analytics dashboards (LADs) has proven beneficial in online environments. Despite the potential of LADs, understanding their design to enhance SRL and provide useful feedback remains a significant challenge. Focusing on LAD design, implementation, and evaluation, the study followed a mixed-methods two-phase design-based research approach. The study used a triangulation methodology of qualitative interviews and SRL and sensemaking questionnaires to comprehensively understand the LAD’s effectiveness and student SRL and feedback uptake strategies during remote procedural skills training. Initial findings revealed the value students placed on performance visualization and peer comparison despite some challenges in LAD design and usability. The study also identified the prominent adoption of SRL strategies such as help-seeking, elaboration, and strategic planning. Sensemaking results showed the value of personalized performance metrics and planning resources in the LAD and recommendations to improve reflection and feedback uptake. Subsequent findings suggested that SRL levels significantly predicted the levels of sensemaking. The students valued the LAD as a tool for supporting feedback uptake and strategic planning, demonstrating the potential for enhancing procedural skills learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing Learning Analytics in Norway A Method for Developing Process-Based Assessments for Computational Thinking Tasks Learners’ Linguistic Alignment and Physiological Synchrony Adaptive Interventions Reducing Social Identity Threat to Increase Equity in Higher Distance Education Following the Impact Chain of the LA Cockpit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1