走出舒适区:从低碳城市到环境友好型城市

Alejandro De Castro Mazarro, N. Joshi, Lasare Samartzidis
{"title":"走出舒适区:从低碳城市到环境友好型城市","authors":"Alejandro De Castro Mazarro, N. Joshi, Lasare Samartzidis","doi":"10.14512/rur.2567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary, we argue for the low-impact city as an alternative to the dominant urban imaginary of the low-carbon city. We adopt an ecological economics lens to expose the limitations of the urban resource efficiency paradigm when tackling environmental degradation beyond city boundaries. Based on the interpretation of urbanisation as a material practice, we urge for a fundamental recalibration of sustainability paradigms in urban planning. To integrate the impacts of urbanisation on non-urban landscapes within the framework of urban sustainability science, we furthermore stress the urgent need for frugality, resource reduction, and inclusiveness in urban planning practice.","PeriodicalId":507133,"journal":{"name":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","volume":"119 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raus aus der Komfortzone: Von kohlenstoffarmen zu umweltschonenden Städten\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro De Castro Mazarro, N. Joshi, Lasare Samartzidis\",\"doi\":\"10.14512/rur.2567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this commentary, we argue for the low-impact city as an alternative to the dominant urban imaginary of the low-carbon city. We adopt an ecological economics lens to expose the limitations of the urban resource efficiency paradigm when tackling environmental degradation beyond city boundaries. Based on the interpretation of urbanisation as a material practice, we urge for a fundamental recalibration of sustainability paradigms in urban planning. To integrate the impacts of urbanisation on non-urban landscapes within the framework of urban sustainability science, we furthermore stress the urgent need for frugality, resource reduction, and inclusiveness in urban planning practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning\",\"volume\":\"119 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中,我们主张将低影响城市作为低碳城市这一主流城市想象的替代方案。我们采用生态经济学的视角,揭示了城市资源效率范式在解决城市边界以外环境退化问题时的局限性。在将城市化解释为一种物质实践的基础上,我们敦促从根本上重新调整城市规划中的可持续性范式。为了将城市化对非城市景观的影响纳入城市可持续性科学的框架,我们进一步强调了城市规划实践中节俭、减少资源和包容性的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Raus aus der Komfortzone: Von kohlenstoffarmen zu umweltschonenden Städten
In this commentary, we argue for the low-impact city as an alternative to the dominant urban imaginary of the low-carbon city. We adopt an ecological economics lens to expose the limitations of the urban resource efficiency paradigm when tackling environmental degradation beyond city boundaries. Based on the interpretation of urbanisation as a material practice, we urge for a fundamental recalibration of sustainability paradigms in urban planning. To integrate the impacts of urbanisation on non-urban landscapes within the framework of urban sustainability science, we furthermore stress the urgent need for frugality, resource reduction, and inclusiveness in urban planning practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing, alternatives and variants in municipal planning processes: general considerations and results of an empirical analysis Mapping access to medical service provision at micro-scale: Dynamics in supply and demand in Germany Raus aus der Komfortzone: Von kohlenstoffarmen zu umweltschonenden Städten Planning problems as epistemic problems. Notes on the debate about multiple truths in planning Book review of: Affolderbach, Julia; Schulz, Christian (2024): Wirtschaftsgeographien der Nachhaltigkeit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1