慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重住院后体育锻炼的障碍和促进因素及其与每日步数的关系:患者的意见很重要

Beatriz Valeiro, Esther Rodríguez, Jaume Ferrer, A. Pasarín, Jordi Ibañez, M. Ramon
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重住院后体育锻炼的障碍和促进因素及其与每日步数的关系:患者的意见很重要","authors":"Beatriz Valeiro, Esther Rodríguez, Jaume Ferrer, A. Pasarín, Jordi Ibañez, M. Ramon","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00216-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) decrease physical activity (PA). PA interventions after these events are desirable but have had mixed results. Understanding the barriers and enablers of PA may help to improve their results. We aimed to assess the barriers and enablers of PA after COPD exacerbation and its association with daily steps.Cross-sectional analysis of patients with COPD enrolled during a hospitalisation for an exacerbation. PA was measured with an accelerometer for 7 days after discharge. Patients completed an ad-hoc 6-point Likert-scale questionnaire about 13 barriers and 9 enablers of PA. We analysed the association between each item and patients’ daily step counts.46 patients with FEV1%pred (mean (sd)) of 48.6 (15.9) completed the assessments. They were 65 (10) years old, spent 8 (2) days hospitalised, and walked 5633 (3314) steps·day−1after discharge. The patients who reported “breathlessness” (median (p25-p75)) (3813 (2664–5639)versus5549 (3692–9984), p 0.034) and “low mood” (3813 (2456–5471)versus5426 (3612–8942), p 0.047) as barriers(yes (≥2/6) versus no (<2/6) responders, respectively)took statistically fewer daily steps; whereas if they considered “PA as healthy” as an enabler walked statically more (5085 (3538–8703)versus2760 (2271–5298), p 0.031).some barriers and enablers of PA reported by patients after a COPD exacerbation relate to daily steps. Assessing PA barriers and enablers could be useful to improve future PA interventions after these events.","PeriodicalId":504874,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and enablers of physical activity and its association with daily steps after hospitalisation for a COPD exacerbation: what patients say matters\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Valeiro, Esther Rodríguez, Jaume Ferrer, A. Pasarín, Jordi Ibañez, M. Ramon\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00216-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) decrease physical activity (PA). PA interventions after these events are desirable but have had mixed results. Understanding the barriers and enablers of PA may help to improve their results. We aimed to assess the barriers and enablers of PA after COPD exacerbation and its association with daily steps.Cross-sectional analysis of patients with COPD enrolled during a hospitalisation for an exacerbation. PA was measured with an accelerometer for 7 days after discharge. Patients completed an ad-hoc 6-point Likert-scale questionnaire about 13 barriers and 9 enablers of PA. We analysed the association between each item and patients’ daily step counts.46 patients with FEV1%pred (mean (sd)) of 48.6 (15.9) completed the assessments. They were 65 (10) years old, spent 8 (2) days hospitalised, and walked 5633 (3314) steps·day−1after discharge. The patients who reported “breathlessness” (median (p25-p75)) (3813 (2664–5639)versus5549 (3692–9984), p 0.034) and “low mood” (3813 (2456–5471)versus5426 (3612–8942), p 0.047) as barriers(yes (≥2/6) versus no (<2/6) responders, respectively)took statistically fewer daily steps; whereas if they considered “PA as healthy” as an enabler walked statically more (5085 (3538–8703)versus2760 (2271–5298), p 0.031).some barriers and enablers of PA reported by patients after a COPD exacerbation relate to daily steps. Assessing PA barriers and enablers could be useful to improve future PA interventions after these events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00216-2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00216-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)病情加重会减少体力活动(PA)。在这些事件发生后进行体育锻炼干预是可取的,但效果不一。了解体育锻炼的障碍和促进因素可能有助于改善干预效果。我们的目的是评估慢性阻塞性肺病恶化后进行体育锻炼的障碍和促进因素,以及体育锻炼与每日步数的关系。在出院后的 7 天内,使用加速度计对患者的 PA 进行了测量。患者填写了一份6点李克特量表的临时问卷,内容涉及13项运动障碍和9项运动促进因素。我们分析了每个项目与患者每日步数之间的关联。46 名患者完成了评估,他们的 FEV1%pred 值(平均值(sd))为 48.6(15.9)。他们的年龄为 65(10)岁,住院 8(2)天,出院后每天步行 5633(3314)步。报告 "呼吸困难"(中位数(p25-p75))(3813(2664-5639)对 5549(3692-9984),p 0.034)和 "情绪低落"(3813(2456-5471)对 5426(3612-8942),p 0.而如果他们认为 "PA 是健康的 "是一种促进因素,那么他们的日行走步数就会增加(5085 (3538-8703)versus2760 (2271-5298),P 0.031)。对患者在慢性阻塞性肺病加重后进行自我锻炼的障碍和促进因素进行评估,将有助于改进未来对这些事件进行的自我锻炼干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and enablers of physical activity and its association with daily steps after hospitalisation for a COPD exacerbation: what patients say matters
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) decrease physical activity (PA). PA interventions after these events are desirable but have had mixed results. Understanding the barriers and enablers of PA may help to improve their results. We aimed to assess the barriers and enablers of PA after COPD exacerbation and its association with daily steps.Cross-sectional analysis of patients with COPD enrolled during a hospitalisation for an exacerbation. PA was measured with an accelerometer for 7 days after discharge. Patients completed an ad-hoc 6-point Likert-scale questionnaire about 13 barriers and 9 enablers of PA. We analysed the association between each item and patients’ daily step counts.46 patients with FEV1%pred (mean (sd)) of 48.6 (15.9) completed the assessments. They were 65 (10) years old, spent 8 (2) days hospitalised, and walked 5633 (3314) steps·day−1after discharge. The patients who reported “breathlessness” (median (p25-p75)) (3813 (2664–5639)versus5549 (3692–9984), p 0.034) and “low mood” (3813 (2456–5471)versus5426 (3612–8942), p 0.047) as barriers(yes (≥2/6) versus no (<2/6) responders, respectively)took statistically fewer daily steps; whereas if they considered “PA as healthy” as an enabler walked statically more (5085 (3538–8703)versus2760 (2271–5298), p 0.031).some barriers and enablers of PA reported by patients after a COPD exacerbation relate to daily steps. Assessing PA barriers and enablers could be useful to improve future PA interventions after these events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary fibrosis in patients with auto-immune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a retrospective nationwide cohort study Long-term dupilumab efficacy in type 2 asthma regardless of baseline characteristics The prevalence and implications of depression and anxiety in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with airways inflammation and increased severity of lung disease in Cystic Fibrosis Extracellular vesicles in sputum of children with cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1