超越 #LandBack:奥萨奇民族的战略关系

IF 1.2 Q1 HISTORY American Indian culture and research journal Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.17953/a3.6617
Jean Dennison
{"title":"超越 #LandBack:奥萨奇民族的战略关系","authors":"Jean Dennison","doi":"10.17953/a3.6617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the #LandBack movement has captured popular imagination, it remains unconvincing to many settlers who are the primary landowners in settler states. This article seeks to expand Indigenous studies understandings of the LandBack movement by looking at the strategic relations the Osage Nation used to get back 43,000 acres of land in 2016. Such strategic relations are mired in colonial and capitalist systems, but they are also how many Native nations, such as the Osage, are rebuilding their homelands. This article thus seeks to tell fuller stories of Indigenous strategies for survival and, ultimately, relationality.","PeriodicalId":80424,"journal":{"name":"American Indian culture and research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond #LandBack: The Osage Nation’s Strategic Relations\",\"authors\":\"Jean Dennison\",\"doi\":\"10.17953/a3.6617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the #LandBack movement has captured popular imagination, it remains unconvincing to many settlers who are the primary landowners in settler states. This article seeks to expand Indigenous studies understandings of the LandBack movement by looking at the strategic relations the Osage Nation used to get back 43,000 acres of land in 2016. Such strategic relations are mired in colonial and capitalist systems, but they are also how many Native nations, such as the Osage, are rebuilding their homelands. This article thus seeks to tell fuller stories of Indigenous strategies for survival and, ultimately, relationality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Indian culture and research journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Indian culture and research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17953/a3.6617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian culture and research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17953/a3.6617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然 #LandBack 运动吸引了大众的想象力,但对于许多定居者来说,它仍然缺乏说服力,因为他们是定居者州的主要土地所有者。本文试图通过研究奥萨奇民族在 2016 年收回 43000 英亩土地时所使用的战略关系,拓展土著研究对土地回归运动的理解。这种战略关系深陷殖民主义和资本主义体系,但也是许多土著民族(如奥塞奇人)重建家园的方式。因此,本文试图更全面地讲述原住民的生存战略,以及最终的关系性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond #LandBack: The Osage Nation’s Strategic Relations
While the #LandBack movement has captured popular imagination, it remains unconvincing to many settlers who are the primary landowners in settler states. This article seeks to expand Indigenous studies understandings of the LandBack movement by looking at the strategic relations the Osage Nation used to get back 43,000 acres of land in 2016. Such strategic relations are mired in colonial and capitalist systems, but they are also how many Native nations, such as the Osage, are rebuilding their homelands. This article thus seeks to tell fuller stories of Indigenous strategies for survival and, ultimately, relationality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Vaudeville Indians” on Global Circuits, 1880s to 1930s Ballot Collection and Native American Voters: An Assessment of Benefits and Costs Beyond the White Picket Fence: American Indians, Suburbanization, and Homeownership Land, Labor, and Relationality: A Critical Engagement of Marx and Indigenous Studies We Are Meant to Rise: Voices for Justice from Minneapolis to the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1