发展中国家石油出口国稳定基金与期货套期保值的实证比较

Ricardo Lalloo
{"title":"发展中国家石油出口国稳定基金与期货套期保值的实证比较","authors":"Ricardo Lalloo","doi":"10.1111/rode.13126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil price volatility can significantly affect the growth and development of oil exporting developing countries. Given the widespread use of stabilization funds as a risk management tool by such countries and the potential of futures hedging to function in a similar vein, no study has effectively compared both mechanisms. This article hence uses the hedging effectiveness measure to examine the potential of each mechanism to smooth the volatile revenues of oil exporting developing countries. The results show that stabilization funds performed best with larger deposit rates and using benchmark prices with larger moving averages. However, the volatility reduction capabilities of optimal futures hedging were found to be far superior and should thus be adopted by oil dependent developing countries as their prime revenue smoothening mechanism.","PeriodicalId":507769,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical comparison of stabilization funds and futures hedging for oil exporting developing countries\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Lalloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rode.13126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oil price volatility can significantly affect the growth and development of oil exporting developing countries. Given the widespread use of stabilization funds as a risk management tool by such countries and the potential of futures hedging to function in a similar vein, no study has effectively compared both mechanisms. This article hence uses the hedging effectiveness measure to examine the potential of each mechanism to smooth the volatile revenues of oil exporting developing countries. The results show that stabilization funds performed best with larger deposit rates and using benchmark prices with larger moving averages. However, the volatility reduction capabilities of optimal futures hedging were found to be far superior and should thus be adopted by oil dependent developing countries as their prime revenue smoothening mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Development Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Development Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

石油价格波动会严重影响石油出口发展中国家的增长和发展。鉴于这些国家广泛使用稳定基金作为风险管理工具,而期货套期保值也有可能发挥类似作用,但目前还没有研究对这两种机制进行有效比较。因此,本文使用套期保值有效性指标来研究每种机制在平滑石油出口发展中国家收入波动方面的潜力。结果显示,稳定基金在存款利率较大和使用移动平均值较大的基准价格时表现最佳。不过,最佳期货套期保值的减少波动能力要强得多,因此依赖石油的发展中国家应将其作为主要的收入平滑机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical comparison of stabilization funds and futures hedging for oil exporting developing countries
Oil price volatility can significantly affect the growth and development of oil exporting developing countries. Given the widespread use of stabilization funds as a risk management tool by such countries and the potential of futures hedging to function in a similar vein, no study has effectively compared both mechanisms. This article hence uses the hedging effectiveness measure to examine the potential of each mechanism to smooth the volatile revenues of oil exporting developing countries. The results show that stabilization funds performed best with larger deposit rates and using benchmark prices with larger moving averages. However, the volatility reduction capabilities of optimal futures hedging were found to be far superior and should thus be adopted by oil dependent developing countries as their prime revenue smoothening mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The shadow wage of child labor: An application to Nepal Climate threat and price stability: A case study of Belize Power to the researchers: Calculating power after estimation An empirical comparison of stabilization funds and futures hedging for oil exporting developing countries Income inequality among peers in China: Does internet penetration have a role?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1