自主手术发展过程中人机互动的形式与复杂性综述

IF 6.8 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1002/aisy.202400197
Tangyou Liu, Jiaole Wang, Shing Wong, Andrew Razjigaev, Susann Beier, Shuhua Peng, Thanh Nho Do, Shuang Song, Dewei Chu, Chun Hui Wang, Nigel H. Lovell, Liao Wu
{"title":"自主手术发展过程中人机互动的形式与复杂性综述","authors":"Tangyou Liu,&nbsp;Jiaole Wang,&nbsp;Shing Wong,&nbsp;Andrew Razjigaev,&nbsp;Susann Beier,&nbsp;Shuhua Peng,&nbsp;Thanh Nho Do,&nbsp;Shuang Song,&nbsp;Dewei Chu,&nbsp;Chun Hui Wang,&nbsp;Nigel H. Lovell,&nbsp;Liao Wu","doi":"10.1002/aisy.202400197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As robotics and intelligence increasingly integrate into surgery, the pivotal role of human–robot interaction (HRI) in surgical procedures and outcomes becomes evident. However, debate rages over whether increasing robot autonomy will result in less human involvement. Some scholars assert that autonomy will reduce human participation, whereas others contend it will result in more complex interactions. To reveal the role of HRI in the evolution of autonomous surgery, this review systematically explores the HRI of robotic surgery with various levels of autonomy. The HRI is examined from both robotic science and clinical practice perspectives, incorporating relevant case studies. Two key components, intention detection and situation awareness, are especially concerned with a brief description of the interfaces and control strategies they rely on. Additional insights are drawn from analogous technologies in aviation, industrial robotics, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis suggests that HRI complexity tends to increase as the robot transitions from no autonomy to conditional autonomy and is predicted to subsequently decrease with a substantial shift in the interaction form when moving toward full autonomy. It is concluded by highlighting challenges from technical and clinical perspectives and delineating research trends in this rapidly evolving field.</p>","PeriodicalId":93858,"journal":{"name":"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aisy.202400197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review on the Form and Complexity of Human–Robot Interaction in the Evolution of Autonomous Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Tangyou Liu,&nbsp;Jiaole Wang,&nbsp;Shing Wong,&nbsp;Andrew Razjigaev,&nbsp;Susann Beier,&nbsp;Shuhua Peng,&nbsp;Thanh Nho Do,&nbsp;Shuang Song,&nbsp;Dewei Chu,&nbsp;Chun Hui Wang,&nbsp;Nigel H. Lovell,&nbsp;Liao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aisy.202400197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As robotics and intelligence increasingly integrate into surgery, the pivotal role of human–robot interaction (HRI) in surgical procedures and outcomes becomes evident. However, debate rages over whether increasing robot autonomy will result in less human involvement. Some scholars assert that autonomy will reduce human participation, whereas others contend it will result in more complex interactions. To reveal the role of HRI in the evolution of autonomous surgery, this review systematically explores the HRI of robotic surgery with various levels of autonomy. The HRI is examined from both robotic science and clinical practice perspectives, incorporating relevant case studies. Two key components, intention detection and situation awareness, are especially concerned with a brief description of the interfaces and control strategies they rely on. Additional insights are drawn from analogous technologies in aviation, industrial robotics, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis suggests that HRI complexity tends to increase as the robot transitions from no autonomy to conditional autonomy and is predicted to subsequently decrease with a substantial shift in the interaction form when moving toward full autonomy. It is concluded by highlighting challenges from technical and clinical perspectives and delineating research trends in this rapidly evolving field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"6 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aisy.202400197\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aisy.202400197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aisy.202400197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着机器人技术和智能技术越来越多地融入外科手术,人机互动(HRI)在手术过程和结果中的关键作用变得显而易见。然而,关于机器人自主性的提高是否会导致人类参与减少的争论仍在激烈进行。一些学者认为,自主性会减少人类的参与,而另一些学者则认为,自主性会带来更复杂的互动。为了揭示人机交互在自主外科手术发展过程中的作用,本综述系统地探讨了具有不同自主水平的机器人外科手术的人机交互。本综述从机器人科学和临床实践两个角度,并结合相关案例研究,对人机交互界面进行了探讨。其中特别关注意图检测和情境感知这两个关键部分,并简要介绍了它们所依赖的界面和控制策略。此外,还从航空、工业机器人和自动驾驶汽车等领域的类似技术中汲取了更多启示。分析表明,当机器人从无自主过渡到有条件自主时,人机交互的复杂性往往会增加,而在向完全自主过渡时,随着交互形式的重大转变,复杂性预计会随之降低。最后,报告从技术和临床角度强调了所面临的挑战,并勾勒出这一快速发展领域的研究趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Review on the Form and Complexity of Human–Robot Interaction in the Evolution of Autonomous Surgery

As robotics and intelligence increasingly integrate into surgery, the pivotal role of human–robot interaction (HRI) in surgical procedures and outcomes becomes evident. However, debate rages over whether increasing robot autonomy will result in less human involvement. Some scholars assert that autonomy will reduce human participation, whereas others contend it will result in more complex interactions. To reveal the role of HRI in the evolution of autonomous surgery, this review systematically explores the HRI of robotic surgery with various levels of autonomy. The HRI is examined from both robotic science and clinical practice perspectives, incorporating relevant case studies. Two key components, intention detection and situation awareness, are especially concerned with a brief description of the interfaces and control strategies they rely on. Additional insights are drawn from analogous technologies in aviation, industrial robotics, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis suggests that HRI complexity tends to increase as the robot transitions from no autonomy to conditional autonomy and is predicted to subsequently decrease with a substantial shift in the interaction form when moving toward full autonomy. It is concluded by highlighting challenges from technical and clinical perspectives and delineating research trends in this rapidly evolving field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Masthead A Flexible, Architected Soft Robotic Actuator for Motorized Extensional Motion Design and Optimization of a Magnetic Field Generator for Magnetic Particle Imaging with Soft Magnetic Materials High-Performance Textile-Based Capacitive Strain Sensors via Enhanced Vapor Phase Polymerization of Pyrrole and Their Application to Machine Learning-Assisted Hand Gesture Recognition Optimized Magnetically Docked Ingestible Capsules for Non-Invasive Refilling of Implantable Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1