宗卡语中简单共词的话语功能

Stephen Watters
{"title":"宗卡语中简单共词的话语功能","authors":"Stephen Watters","doi":"10.1075/fol.22056.wat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The marking on copular verbs in Tibetic languages is regarded as an exemplar of egophoricity, although the extent\n to which it has been grammaticalized varies between languages. Dzongkha, a southern Tibetic language, is somewhat atypical of the\n egophoric pattern in the sense that the basic opposition in copulas exhibits a mirative pattern, wherein the non-mirative\n (egophoric) copula occurs with all grammatical persons in declaratives and interrogatives, and the mirative (non-egophoric) occurs\n with the 3rd person and rarely with 1st and 2nd persons. The conversational data studied for this paper also show that the speaker\n need not take knowledge stances that bifurcate the world between objectively ‘old’ and ‘new’ knowledge and the attendant\n associations of knowledge with a particular grammatical person. Rather, the speaker’s representation of events is subjective, and\n dependent, in part, on the knowledge stances between speaker and respondent. What is in view in conversational interaction are the\n social goals of the conversation — assertions, face-saving strategies, and arriving at mutually shared knowledge — and the\n Dzongkha copulas are a manipulable linguistic resource in achieving these.","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"123 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The discourse functions of simple copulas in Dzongkha\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Watters\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/fol.22056.wat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The marking on copular verbs in Tibetic languages is regarded as an exemplar of egophoricity, although the extent\\n to which it has been grammaticalized varies between languages. Dzongkha, a southern Tibetic language, is somewhat atypical of the\\n egophoric pattern in the sense that the basic opposition in copulas exhibits a mirative pattern, wherein the non-mirative\\n (egophoric) copula occurs with all grammatical persons in declaratives and interrogatives, and the mirative (non-egophoric) occurs\\n with the 3rd person and rarely with 1st and 2nd persons. The conversational data studied for this paper also show that the speaker\\n need not take knowledge stances that bifurcate the world between objectively ‘old’ and ‘new’ knowledge and the attendant\\n associations of knowledge with a particular grammatical person. Rather, the speaker’s representation of events is subjective, and\\n dependent, in part, on the knowledge stances between speaker and respondent. What is in view in conversational interaction are the\\n social goals of the conversation — assertions, face-saving strategies, and arriving at mutually shared knowledge — and the\\n Dzongkha copulas are a manipulable linguistic resource in achieving these.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functions of Language\",\"volume\":\"123 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functions of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22056.wat\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22056.wat","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管不同语言的语法化程度不同,但在藏语中,对共轭动词的标记被认为是egophoricity的典范。宗卡语是一种南方的藏语,在某种程度上是非 "egophoric "模式的典型,因为共轭动词中的基本对立呈现出一种 "mirative "模式,其中非 "mirative"(egophoric)共轭动词出现在陈述句和疑问句中的所有语法人称中,而 "mirative"(非egophoric)则出现在第三人称中,很少出现在第一和第二人称中。本文研究的会话数据还表明,说话人不必采取将世界划分为客观上的 "旧 "知识和 "新 "知识的知识立场,以及随之而来的知识与特定语法人称的关联。相反,说话者对事件的表述是主观的,部分取决于说话者和应答者之间的知识立场。在会话互动中,人们所关注的是会话的社会目标--断言、面子策略和达成相互共享的知识--而宗卡语中的助词是实现这些目标的一种可操作的语言资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The discourse functions of simple copulas in Dzongkha
The marking on copular verbs in Tibetic languages is regarded as an exemplar of egophoricity, although the extent to which it has been grammaticalized varies between languages. Dzongkha, a southern Tibetic language, is somewhat atypical of the egophoric pattern in the sense that the basic opposition in copulas exhibits a mirative pattern, wherein the non-mirative (egophoric) copula occurs with all grammatical persons in declaratives and interrogatives, and the mirative (non-egophoric) occurs with the 3rd person and rarely with 1st and 2nd persons. The conversational data studied for this paper also show that the speaker need not take knowledge stances that bifurcate the world between objectively ‘old’ and ‘new’ knowledge and the attendant associations of knowledge with a particular grammatical person. Rather, the speaker’s representation of events is subjective, and dependent, in part, on the knowledge stances between speaker and respondent. What is in view in conversational interaction are the social goals of the conversation — assertions, face-saving strategies, and arriving at mutually shared knowledge — and the Dzongkha copulas are a manipulable linguistic resource in achieving these.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘What we found is’ Functional transition from hear to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories The discourse functions of simple copulas in Dzongkha Eyes do not lie but words do Review of Steen (2023): Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1