临床实践中需要专门的 ICF 培训:仅有 ICF 框架教育是不够的

Jaana Paltamaa, Ellen van Lingen, Christine Haumer, Anita Kidritsch, Ingrid Aerts, Laura Mutanen
{"title":"临床实践中需要专门的 ICF 培训:仅有 ICF 框架教育是不够的","authors":"Jaana Paltamaa, Ellen van Lingen, Christine Haumer, Anita Kidritsch, Ingrid Aerts, Laura Mutanen","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1351564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of a common language in interprofessional collaboration is essential. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has been identified as a unifying framework for interprofessional collaboration and the identification of client needs. Higher education institutions (HEIs) offer ICF framework education to students but is it enough to enable graduated professionals to implement the ICF in clinical work? In our experience, the ICF education provided by HEIs does not meet the requirements of clinical practice, which might be due to gaps in teaching ICF to students (education) and specific requirements for teaching ICF to professionals already working in rehabilitation (training). This paper discusses the need for the ICF training in practice and ways to address it. Although many rehabilitation center professionals had previously received ICF education provided by the HEIs, the rehabilitation centers felt the need to develop their own practical training materials that could be applied to their own environment. Overall, 18 different ICF-based materials were developed during the Erasmus+ project called INPRO to promote person-centered and interprofessional practice in the rehabilitation centers. The practical training using real cases was considered valuable. It could be further developed in cooperation with HEIs and vice versa. It could also be used to teach students, i.e., future colleagues. To deepen and broaden the integration of the different materials based on the ICF, it is important to continue the interactive discussion between HEIs and clinical practice, and between management and its staff.","PeriodicalId":507590,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specific ICF training is needed in clinical practice: ICF framework education is not enough\",\"authors\":\"Jaana Paltamaa, Ellen van Lingen, Christine Haumer, Anita Kidritsch, Ingrid Aerts, Laura Mutanen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2024.1351564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of a common language in interprofessional collaboration is essential. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has been identified as a unifying framework for interprofessional collaboration and the identification of client needs. Higher education institutions (HEIs) offer ICF framework education to students but is it enough to enable graduated professionals to implement the ICF in clinical work? In our experience, the ICF education provided by HEIs does not meet the requirements of clinical practice, which might be due to gaps in teaching ICF to students (education) and specific requirements for teaching ICF to professionals already working in rehabilitation (training). This paper discusses the need for the ICF training in practice and ways to address it. Although many rehabilitation center professionals had previously received ICF education provided by the HEIs, the rehabilitation centers felt the need to develop their own practical training materials that could be applied to their own environment. Overall, 18 different ICF-based materials were developed during the Erasmus+ project called INPRO to promote person-centered and interprofessional practice in the rehabilitation centers. The practical training using real cases was considered valuable. It could be further developed in cooperation with HEIs and vice versa. It could also be used to teach students, i.e., future colleagues. To deepen and broaden the integration of the different materials based on the ICF, it is important to continue the interactive discussion between HEIs and clinical practice, and between management and its staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1351564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1351564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在跨专业合作中使用共同语言至关重要。世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)已被确定为跨专业合作和确定客户需求的统一框架。高等教育机构(HEIs)为学生提供 ICF 框架教育,但这是否足以使毕业的专业人员在临床工作中实施 ICF 呢?根据我们的经验,高等院校提供的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》教育并不符合临床实践的要求,这可能是由于向学生教授《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(教育)和向已从事康复工作的专业人员教授《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(培训)的具体要求存在差距。本文讨论了实践中对 ICF 培训的需求和解决方法。尽管许多康复中心的专业人员以前接受过高等院校提供的 ICF 教育,但康复中心认为有必要开发自己的实用培训材料,以适用于自己的环境。在名为 "INPRO "的伊拉斯谟+项目期间,共编写了 18 种不同的基于 ICF 的教材,以促进康复中心以人为本的跨专业实践。使用真实案例进行的实践培训被认为非常有价值。可以与高等院校合作进一步开发,反之亦然。它还可用于教授学生,即未来的同事。为了深化和扩大以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》为基础的各种材料的整合,必须继续在高等院校和临床实践之间以及管理层和员工之间开展互动讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specific ICF training is needed in clinical practice: ICF framework education is not enough
The use of a common language in interprofessional collaboration is essential. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has been identified as a unifying framework for interprofessional collaboration and the identification of client needs. Higher education institutions (HEIs) offer ICF framework education to students but is it enough to enable graduated professionals to implement the ICF in clinical work? In our experience, the ICF education provided by HEIs does not meet the requirements of clinical practice, which might be due to gaps in teaching ICF to students (education) and specific requirements for teaching ICF to professionals already working in rehabilitation (training). This paper discusses the need for the ICF training in practice and ways to address it. Although many rehabilitation center professionals had previously received ICF education provided by the HEIs, the rehabilitation centers felt the need to develop their own practical training materials that could be applied to their own environment. Overall, 18 different ICF-based materials were developed during the Erasmus+ project called INPRO to promote person-centered and interprofessional practice in the rehabilitation centers. The practical training using real cases was considered valuable. It could be further developed in cooperation with HEIs and vice versa. It could also be used to teach students, i.e., future colleagues. To deepen and broaden the integration of the different materials based on the ICF, it is important to continue the interactive discussion between HEIs and clinical practice, and between management and its staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICF in Bachelor degree programs—the implementation of the ICF in the clinical reasoning process of physical therapists for neurological patients—optimizing the health curriculum for comprehensive patient care Assessing proprioception in children with upper motor neuron lesions: feasibility, validity, and reliability of the proprioception measurement tool “Pain is not typically taken into consideration due to him being nonverbal”- emergency department experiences among persons with disabilities: a mixed methods study in Kingston, Ontario Proximal auditory AR rehabilitation: system integration and wellness applications—from hearing support up toward vestibular rehabilitation Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature—a mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1