上肢骨折后舒适度和能力的恢复主要与心态有关:英国纵向队列研究

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000002868
Niels Brinkman, Jacob E. Thomas, T. Teunis, David Ring, Stephen Gwilym, Prakash Jayakumar
{"title":"上肢骨折后舒适度和能力的恢复主要与心态有关:英国纵向队列研究","authors":"Niels Brinkman, Jacob E. Thomas, T. Teunis, David Ring, Stephen Gwilym, Prakash Jayakumar","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To determine the relative influence of mindset and fracture severity on 9-month recovery trajectories of pain and capability after upper extremity fractures.\n \n \n \n \n Design: Secondary use of longitudinal data.\n \n \n \n Single level-1 trauma center in Oxford, United Kingdom.\n \n \n \n English speaking adults with isolated proximal humerus, elbow or distal radius fracture managed operatively or non-operatively were included, and those with multiple fractures or cognitive deficit were excluded.\n \n \n \n Incapability (Quick-DASH) and pain intensity (11-point rating scale) were measured at baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 6-9 months after injury. Cluster analysis was used to identify statistical groupings of mindset (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and fracture severity (low/moderate/high based on AO/OTA classification). The recovery trajectories of incapability and pain intensity for each mindset grouping were assessed, accounting for various fracture related aspects.\n \n \n \n Among 703 included patients (59 ± 21 years old, 66% women, 16% high energy injury), four statistical groupings with escalating levels of distress and unhelpful thoughts were identified (fracture severity was omitted considering it had no differentiating effect). Groups with less healthy mindset had a worse baseline incapability (group 2: β=4.1, 3: β=7.5, 4: β=17) and pain intensity (group 3: β=0.70, 4: β=1.4)(p<0.01). Higher fracture severity (β=4.5), high energy injury (β=4.0), and nerve palsy (β=8.1) were associated with worse baseline incapability (p<0.01), and high energy injury (β=0.62) and nerve palsy (β=0.76) with worse baseline pain intensity (p<0.01). Groups 3 and 4 had a prolonged rate of recovery of incapability (β=1.3, β=7.0) and pain intensity (β=0.19, β=1.1)(p<0.02).\n \n \n \n Patients with higher levels of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress regarding symptoms experienced worse recovery of pain and incapability, with a higher effect size than fracture location, fracture severity, high energy injury, and nerve palsy. These findings underline the importance of anticipating and addressing mental health concerns during recovery from injury.\n \n \n \n Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery of Comfort and Capability after Upper Extremity Fracture is Predominantly Associated with Mindset: A Longitudinal Cohort from the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Niels Brinkman, Jacob E. Thomas, T. Teunis, David Ring, Stephen Gwilym, Prakash Jayakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bot.0000000000002868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To determine the relative influence of mindset and fracture severity on 9-month recovery trajectories of pain and capability after upper extremity fractures.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Design: Secondary use of longitudinal data.\\n \\n \\n \\n Single level-1 trauma center in Oxford, United Kingdom.\\n \\n \\n \\n English speaking adults with isolated proximal humerus, elbow or distal radius fracture managed operatively or non-operatively were included, and those with multiple fractures or cognitive deficit were excluded.\\n \\n \\n \\n Incapability (Quick-DASH) and pain intensity (11-point rating scale) were measured at baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 6-9 months after injury. Cluster analysis was used to identify statistical groupings of mindset (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and fracture severity (low/moderate/high based on AO/OTA classification). The recovery trajectories of incapability and pain intensity for each mindset grouping were assessed, accounting for various fracture related aspects.\\n \\n \\n \\n Among 703 included patients (59 ± 21 years old, 66% women, 16% high energy injury), four statistical groupings with escalating levels of distress and unhelpful thoughts were identified (fracture severity was omitted considering it had no differentiating effect). Groups with less healthy mindset had a worse baseline incapability (group 2: β=4.1, 3: β=7.5, 4: β=17) and pain intensity (group 3: β=0.70, 4: β=1.4)(p<0.01). Higher fracture severity (β=4.5), high energy injury (β=4.0), and nerve palsy (β=8.1) were associated with worse baseline incapability (p<0.01), and high energy injury (β=0.62) and nerve palsy (β=0.76) with worse baseline pain intensity (p<0.01). Groups 3 and 4 had a prolonged rate of recovery of incapability (β=1.3, β=7.0) and pain intensity (β=0.19, β=1.1)(p<0.02).\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with higher levels of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress regarding symptoms experienced worse recovery of pain and incapability, with a higher effect size than fracture location, fracture severity, high energy injury, and nerve palsy. These findings underline the importance of anticipating and addressing mental health concerns during recovery from injury.\\n \\n \\n \\n Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定心态和骨折严重程度对上肢骨折后 9 个月疼痛和能力恢复轨迹的相对影响。 设计:二次使用纵向数据。 地点: 英国牛津的一级创伤中心。 纳入接受手术或非手术治疗的肱骨近端、肘部或桡骨远端孤立骨折的英语成人,排除多处骨折或认知障碍的成人。 分别在基线、伤后2-4周和6-9个月测量了丧失能力(Quick-DASH)和疼痛强度(11点评分量表)。聚类分析用于确定心态(PROMIS 抑郁和焦虑量表、疼痛灾难化量表和坦帕运动恐惧症量表)和骨折严重程度(根据 AO/OTA 分类为低度/中度/高度)的统计分组。在考虑到与骨折相关的各种因素的情况下,对每种心态分组的能力和疼痛强度的恢复轨迹进行了评估。 在纳入的 703 名患者(59 ± 21 岁,66% 为女性,16% 为高能量损伤)中,确定了四种统计分组,这些分组的痛苦和无益想法程度不断升级(考虑到骨折严重程度没有区分作用,因此省略了这一分组)。心态不那么健康的组别,其基准能力(第 2 组:β=4.1;第 3 组:β=7.5;第 4 组:β=17)和疼痛强度(第 3 组:β=0.70;第 4 组:β=1.4)均较差(P<0.01)。较高的骨折严重程度(β=4.5)、高能量损伤(β=4.0)和神经麻痹(β=8.1)与较差的基线能力相关(p<0.01),高能量损伤(β=0.62)和神经麻痹(β=0.76)与较差的基线疼痛强度相关(p<0.01)。第 3 组和第 4 组的能力恢复率(β=1.3,β=7.0)和疼痛强度恢复率(β=0.19,β=1.1)较长(P<0.02)。 对症状有较多无益思维和痛苦感的患者,其疼痛和丧失能力的恢复情况较差,其影响大小高于骨折位置、骨折严重程度、高能量损伤和神经麻痹。这些发现强调了在伤后恢复期间预测和解决心理健康问题的重要性。 预后三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recovery of Comfort and Capability after Upper Extremity Fracture is Predominantly Associated with Mindset: A Longitudinal Cohort from the United Kingdom
To determine the relative influence of mindset and fracture severity on 9-month recovery trajectories of pain and capability after upper extremity fractures. Design: Secondary use of longitudinal data. Single level-1 trauma center in Oxford, United Kingdom. English speaking adults with isolated proximal humerus, elbow or distal radius fracture managed operatively or non-operatively were included, and those with multiple fractures or cognitive deficit were excluded. Incapability (Quick-DASH) and pain intensity (11-point rating scale) were measured at baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 6-9 months after injury. Cluster analysis was used to identify statistical groupings of mindset (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and fracture severity (low/moderate/high based on AO/OTA classification). The recovery trajectories of incapability and pain intensity for each mindset grouping were assessed, accounting for various fracture related aspects. Among 703 included patients (59 ± 21 years old, 66% women, 16% high energy injury), four statistical groupings with escalating levels of distress and unhelpful thoughts were identified (fracture severity was omitted considering it had no differentiating effect). Groups with less healthy mindset had a worse baseline incapability (group 2: β=4.1, 3: β=7.5, 4: β=17) and pain intensity (group 3: β=0.70, 4: β=1.4)(p<0.01). Higher fracture severity (β=4.5), high energy injury (β=4.0), and nerve palsy (β=8.1) were associated with worse baseline incapability (p<0.01), and high energy injury (β=0.62) and nerve palsy (β=0.76) with worse baseline pain intensity (p<0.01). Groups 3 and 4 had a prolonged rate of recovery of incapability (β=1.3, β=7.0) and pain intensity (β=0.19, β=1.1)(p<0.02). Patients with higher levels of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress regarding symptoms experienced worse recovery of pain and incapability, with a higher effect size than fracture location, fracture severity, high energy injury, and nerve palsy. These findings underline the importance of anticipating and addressing mental health concerns during recovery from injury. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery Is Associated with Increased Post-operative Emergency Department Visits. Lower Extremity Trauma is Associated With an Increased Rate of New Mental Disorder Diagnosis and Suicide Attempt. The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study. Heritable Thrombophilia and Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis After Pelvis or Acetabulum Fracture. Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1