孤立性颈内动脉闭塞的血管内疗法

Katrine Falkesgaard, J. N. Hedegaard, Jonas Jensen, T. Leslie-Mazwi, R. Blauenfeldt, Claus Z. Simonsen
{"title":"孤立性颈内动脉闭塞的血管内疗法","authors":"Katrine Falkesgaard, J. N. Hedegaard, Jonas Jensen, T. Leslie-Mazwi, R. Blauenfeldt, Claus Z. Simonsen","doi":"10.1161/svin.124.001382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Guidelines on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke do not include isolated cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) occlusions. The effect of treating these lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients with isolated cICA occlusions to patients who underwent endovascular therapy due to a level of occlusion supported by guidelines.\n \n \n \n A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1162 patients who underwent endovascular therapy. Of these, 115 had an isolated cICA occlusion. Univariate analysis of baseline characteristics and outcome measured by the modified Rankin scale 90 days after endovascular therapy were compared between patients with isolated cICA occlusion, those with tandem occlusions, and those with occlusions of the middle cerebral artery/top of the internal carotid artery (first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery). To adjust for confounders, an inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed.\n \n \n \n \n Patients with isolated cICA occlusions were more likely men (67.8% versus 50.9%;\n P\n <0.001) and active smokers (42.2% versus 26.4%;\n P\n = 0.002) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions where atrial fibrillation was more common (35.5% versus 23.5%;\n P\n = 0.02). Patients with an isolated cICA had a lower chance of achieving a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (adjusted relative risk, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54–0.92]) and a higher mortality rate (adjusted relative risk, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.36–2.87]) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions.\n \n \n \n \n Patients with isolated cICA occlusions and first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions differ in sex, smoking status, and rate of atrial fibrillation. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions have lower reperfusion rates, worse outcome, and a higher mortality rate.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular Therapy for Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion\",\"authors\":\"Katrine Falkesgaard, J. N. Hedegaard, Jonas Jensen, T. Leslie-Mazwi, R. Blauenfeldt, Claus Z. Simonsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.124.001382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Guidelines on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke do not include isolated cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) occlusions. The effect of treating these lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients with isolated cICA occlusions to patients who underwent endovascular therapy due to a level of occlusion supported by guidelines.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1162 patients who underwent endovascular therapy. Of these, 115 had an isolated cICA occlusion. Univariate analysis of baseline characteristics and outcome measured by the modified Rankin scale 90 days after endovascular therapy were compared between patients with isolated cICA occlusion, those with tandem occlusions, and those with occlusions of the middle cerebral artery/top of the internal carotid artery (first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery). To adjust for confounders, an inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with isolated cICA occlusions were more likely men (67.8% versus 50.9%;\\n P\\n <0.001) and active smokers (42.2% versus 26.4%;\\n P\\n = 0.002) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions where atrial fibrillation was more common (35.5% versus 23.5%;\\n P\\n = 0.02). Patients with an isolated cICA had a lower chance of achieving a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (adjusted relative risk, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54–0.92]) and a higher mortality rate (adjusted relative risk, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.36–2.87]) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with isolated cICA occlusions and first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions differ in sex, smoking status, and rate of atrial fibrillation. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions have lower reperfusion rates, worse outcome, and a higher mortality rate.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗指南不包括孤立的颈内动脉(cICA)闭塞。治疗这些病变的效果仍不明确。本研究旨在比较孤立性颈内动脉闭塞患者与因指南支持的闭塞程度而接受血管内治疗的患者的基线特征和治疗效果。 研究对 1162 名接受血管内治疗的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。其中 115 例为孤立的 cICA 闭塞。对孤立性 cICA 闭塞患者、串联闭塞患者和大脑中动脉/颈内动脉顶部(大脑中动脉第一段/颅内颈内动脉)闭塞患者的基线特征和血管内治疗 90 天后的改良 Rankin 评分结果进行了单变量分析比较。为了调整混杂因素,采用了治疗概率反向加权法。 与大脑中动脉/颅内颈内动脉第一段闭塞的患者相比,孤立性 cICA 闭塞的患者更可能是男性(67.8% 对 50.9%;P <0.001)和活跃的吸烟者(42.2% 对 26.4%;P = 0.002),而在大脑中动脉/颅内颈内动脉第一段闭塞的患者中,心房颤动更为常见(35.5% 对 23.5%;P = 0.02)。与大脑中动脉第一段/颅内颈内动脉闭塞的患者相比,孤立性 cICA 患者在 90 天内达到改良兰金量表 0 至 2 分的几率较低(调整后相对风险为 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.92]),死亡率较高(调整后相对风险为 1.97 [95% CI, 1.36-2.87])。 孤立性 cICA 闭塞患者与大脑中动脉第一段/颅内颈内动脉闭塞患者在性别、吸烟状况和心房颤动发生率方面存在差异。孤立的 cICA 闭塞患者的再灌注率较低,预后较差,死亡率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endovascular Therapy for Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
Guidelines on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke do not include isolated cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) occlusions. The effect of treating these lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients with isolated cICA occlusions to patients who underwent endovascular therapy due to a level of occlusion supported by guidelines. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1162 patients who underwent endovascular therapy. Of these, 115 had an isolated cICA occlusion. Univariate analysis of baseline characteristics and outcome measured by the modified Rankin scale 90 days after endovascular therapy were compared between patients with isolated cICA occlusion, those with tandem occlusions, and those with occlusions of the middle cerebral artery/top of the internal carotid artery (first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery). To adjust for confounders, an inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions were more likely men (67.8% versus 50.9%; P <0.001) and active smokers (42.2% versus 26.4%; P = 0.002) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions where atrial fibrillation was more common (35.5% versus 23.5%; P = 0.02). Patients with an isolated cICA had a lower chance of achieving a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (adjusted relative risk, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54–0.92]) and a higher mortality rate (adjusted relative risk, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.36–2.87]) compared with patients with first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions and first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions differ in sex, smoking status, and rate of atrial fibrillation. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions have lower reperfusion rates, worse outcome, and a higher mortality rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1