功能磁共振成像引导下的重复经颅磁刺激对脑小血管疾病认知障碍的影响

Q3 Multidisciplinary Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.17816/acen.1087
D. Lagoda, I. Bakulin, A. Poydasheva, D. Sinitsyn, A. Zabirova, Z. S. Gadzhieva, M. R. Zabitova, K. Shamtieva, L. A. Dobrynina, N. A. Suponeva, M. Piradov
{"title":"功能磁共振成像引导下的重复经颅磁刺激对脑小血管疾病认知障碍的影响","authors":"D. Lagoda, I. Bakulin, A. Poydasheva, D. Sinitsyn, A. Zabirova, Z. S. Gadzhieva, M. R. Zabitova, K. Shamtieva, L. A. Dobrynina, N. A. Suponeva, M. Piradov","doi":"10.17816/acen.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is one of the leading causes of vascular and mixed cognitive impairment (CI). Treatment options for CSVD-associated CI are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising non-drug treatment option. \nThe aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 10 rTMS sessions of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive functions in CSVD patients. \nMaterials and methods. The study included 30 patients with CSVD and moderate CI randomized to the active (DLPFC stimulation; n = 20) and control (vertex stimulation; n = 10) groups. Both groups received 10 sessions of high-frequency rTMS. The DLPFC target was selected based on the individual paradigm fMRI data with a focus on executive functions. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Tower of London Test, and the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test before, immediately after, and 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events were assessed using standardized questionnaires. \nResults. The active group showed a significantly better effect compared to the control group according to MoCA, TMT A and B, The Tower of London Test, delayed recall on the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test immediately after the stimulation and MoCA, TMT A and B and The Tower of London 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events in the study were mild and did not affect treatment adherence. \nConclusion. rTMS is a promising, safe, and well-tolerated treatment option for mild cognitive impairment in CSVD. However, additional research is needed to make recommendations for its clinical use.","PeriodicalId":36946,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional MRI-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease\",\"authors\":\"D. Lagoda, I. Bakulin, A. Poydasheva, D. Sinitsyn, A. Zabirova, Z. S. Gadzhieva, M. R. Zabitova, K. Shamtieva, L. A. Dobrynina, N. A. Suponeva, M. Piradov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/acen.1087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is one of the leading causes of vascular and mixed cognitive impairment (CI). Treatment options for CSVD-associated CI are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising non-drug treatment option. \\nThe aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 10 rTMS sessions of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive functions in CSVD patients. \\nMaterials and methods. The study included 30 patients with CSVD and moderate CI randomized to the active (DLPFC stimulation; n = 20) and control (vertex stimulation; n = 10) groups. Both groups received 10 sessions of high-frequency rTMS. The DLPFC target was selected based on the individual paradigm fMRI data with a focus on executive functions. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Tower of London Test, and the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test before, immediately after, and 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events were assessed using standardized questionnaires. \\nResults. The active group showed a significantly better effect compared to the control group according to MoCA, TMT A and B, The Tower of London Test, delayed recall on the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test immediately after the stimulation and MoCA, TMT A and B and The Tower of London 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events in the study were mild and did not affect treatment adherence. \\nConclusion. rTMS is a promising, safe, and well-tolerated treatment option for mild cognitive impairment in CSVD. However, additional research is needed to make recommendations for its clinical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/acen.1087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/acen.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介。脑小血管疾病(CSVD)是导致血管性和混合性认知障碍(CI)的主要原因之一。CSVD相关CI的治疗方案有限。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种很有前景的非药物治疗方法。本研究旨在评估对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)进行 10 次经颅磁刺激对 CSVD 患者认知功能的影响。材料和方法。研究纳入了 30 名 CSVD 和中度 CI 患者,随机分为主动组(DLPFC 刺激;n = 20)和对照组(顶点刺激;n = 10)。两组患者均接受了 10 次高频经颅磁刺激。DLPFC 目标是根据个人范式 fMRI 数据选择的,重点是执行功能。认知功能的评估采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、寻迹测试(TMT)、伦敦塔测试和雷伊-奥斯特里赫斯复杂图形测试,分别在刺激前、刺激后和刺激后三个月进行。不良反应采用标准化问卷进行评估。结果显示与对照组相比,积极组在刺激后立即进行的MoCA、TMT A和B、伦敦塔测试、Rey-Osterrieth复合图形测试的延迟回忆,以及刺激后3个月进行的MoCA、TMT A和B、伦敦塔测试的效果明显更好。研究中出现的不良反应轻微,不影响治疗的依从性。经颅磁刺激是治疗 CSVD 轻度认知障碍的一种前景广阔、安全且耐受性良好的治疗方法。不过,还需要进行更多的研究,才能为其临床应用提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functional MRI-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease
Introduction. Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is one of the leading causes of vascular and mixed cognitive impairment (CI). Treatment options for CSVD-associated CI are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising non-drug treatment option. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 10 rTMS sessions of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive functions in CSVD patients. Materials and methods. The study included 30 patients with CSVD and moderate CI randomized to the active (DLPFC stimulation; n = 20) and control (vertex stimulation; n = 10) groups. Both groups received 10 sessions of high-frequency rTMS. The DLPFC target was selected based on the individual paradigm fMRI data with a focus on executive functions. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Tower of London Test, and the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test before, immediately after, and 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events were assessed using standardized questionnaires. Results. The active group showed a significantly better effect compared to the control group according to MoCA, TMT A and B, The Tower of London Test, delayed recall on the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test immediately after the stimulation and MoCA, TMT A and B and The Tower of London 3 months after the stimulation. Adverse events in the study were mild and did not affect treatment adherence. Conclusion. rTMS is a promising, safe, and well-tolerated treatment option for mild cognitive impairment in CSVD. However, additional research is needed to make recommendations for its clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Phenotypes of COVID-19-associated dysautonomia in patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Optimization of laboratory diagnostics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: indications and algorithms Postoperative hemorrhages in vestibular schwannoma surgery pontine hemorrhage. Clinical case report Immunomorphologic assessment of changes in functional astroglial proteins in a kainate-induced hippocampal sclerosis model Simultaneous dual-target magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1