Arturo Bonometti, Simone Zanella, Daoud Rahal, Chiara Milanesi, Rossella Caselli, M. D. Della Porta, S. Uccella, S. Fraticelli
{"title":"具有介于原发性骨髓纤维化和慢性粒细胞白血病之间特征的骨髓增生异常/骨髓增生性肿瘤:病例系列和实体回顾","authors":"Arturo Bonometti, Simone Zanella, Daoud Rahal, Chiara Milanesi, Rossella Caselli, M. D. Della Porta, S. Uccella, S. Fraticelli","doi":"10.3390/hemato5030019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm is currently performed according to the presence of a predetermined set of clinical, morphological, and molecular diagnostic criteria agreed upon by a consensus of experts. Even strictly adhering to these criteria, it is possible to encounter patients who present features that are not easily ascribable to a single disease category. This is the case, e.g., of patients with de novo myeloid neoplasms with features intermediate between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In this study, we retrospectively searched the pathological database of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital to identify cases of chronic myeloid neoplasm with monocytosis with a driver mutation of classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and showing morphological MPN features. For each case, we assessed all epidemiological, clinical, histopathological, and molecular data. Then, we carried out a literature review, searching for cases with features similar to those of our patients. We retrieved a total of 13 cases presenting such criteria (9 from the literature review and 4 from our institution); in all of them, there was a coexistence of clinical, histopathological, and molecular myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. To date, according to current classifications (World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification), given the presence/absence of essential features for PMF or CMML, these patients should be formally diagnosed as myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassified/not otherwise specified (U/NOS). This review aims to summarize the features of these difficult cases and discuss their differential diagnosis and their classification according to the novel classifications and the existing literature on overlapping myeloid neoplasms.","PeriodicalId":93705,"journal":{"name":"Hemato","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with Features Intermediate between Primary Myelofibrosis and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Case Series and Review of the Entity\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Bonometti, Simone Zanella, Daoud Rahal, Chiara Milanesi, Rossella Caselli, M. D. Della Porta, S. Uccella, S. Fraticelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/hemato5030019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm is currently performed according to the presence of a predetermined set of clinical, morphological, and molecular diagnostic criteria agreed upon by a consensus of experts. Even strictly adhering to these criteria, it is possible to encounter patients who present features that are not easily ascribable to a single disease category. This is the case, e.g., of patients with de novo myeloid neoplasms with features intermediate between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In this study, we retrospectively searched the pathological database of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital to identify cases of chronic myeloid neoplasm with monocytosis with a driver mutation of classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and showing morphological MPN features. For each case, we assessed all epidemiological, clinical, histopathological, and molecular data. Then, we carried out a literature review, searching for cases with features similar to those of our patients. We retrieved a total of 13 cases presenting such criteria (9 from the literature review and 4 from our institution); in all of them, there was a coexistence of clinical, histopathological, and molecular myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. To date, according to current classifications (World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification), given the presence/absence of essential features for PMF or CMML, these patients should be formally diagnosed as myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassified/not otherwise specified (U/NOS). This review aims to summarize the features of these difficult cases and discuss their differential diagnosis and their classification according to the novel classifications and the existing literature on overlapping myeloid neoplasms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hemato\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hemato\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato5030019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemato","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato5030019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with Features Intermediate between Primary Myelofibrosis and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Case Series and Review of the Entity
Diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm is currently performed according to the presence of a predetermined set of clinical, morphological, and molecular diagnostic criteria agreed upon by a consensus of experts. Even strictly adhering to these criteria, it is possible to encounter patients who present features that are not easily ascribable to a single disease category. This is the case, e.g., of patients with de novo myeloid neoplasms with features intermediate between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In this study, we retrospectively searched the pathological database of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital to identify cases of chronic myeloid neoplasm with monocytosis with a driver mutation of classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and showing morphological MPN features. For each case, we assessed all epidemiological, clinical, histopathological, and molecular data. Then, we carried out a literature review, searching for cases with features similar to those of our patients. We retrieved a total of 13 cases presenting such criteria (9 from the literature review and 4 from our institution); in all of them, there was a coexistence of clinical, histopathological, and molecular myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. To date, according to current classifications (World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification), given the presence/absence of essential features for PMF or CMML, these patients should be formally diagnosed as myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassified/not otherwise specified (U/NOS). This review aims to summarize the features of these difficult cases and discuss their differential diagnosis and their classification according to the novel classifications and the existing literature on overlapping myeloid neoplasms.