血管内血栓切除术与静脉注射阿替普酶治疗远端中血管闭塞:倾向评分匹配分析

T. Yoshie, T. Ueda, Y. Hasegawa, M. Takeuchi, M. Morimoto, Y. Tsuboi, R. Yamamoto, S. Kaku, J. Ayabe, T. Akiyama, D. Yamamoto, K. Mori, H. Kagami, H. Ito, Hidetaka Onodera, Y. Kaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Tatsuno, N. Usuki, S. Takaishi, Y. Yamano
{"title":"血管内血栓切除术与静脉注射阿替普酶治疗远端中血管闭塞:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"T. Yoshie, T. Ueda, Y. Hasegawa, M. Takeuchi, M. Morimoto, Y. Tsuboi, R. Yamamoto, S. Kaku, J. Ayabe, T. Akiyama, D. Yamamoto, K. Mori, H. Kagami, H. Ito, Hidetaka Onodera, Y. Kaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Tatsuno, N. Usuki, S. Takaishi, Y. Yamano","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are not well established. This study aimed to determine the superiority of EVT over intravenous tissue‐type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) in the treatment of DMVOs.\n \n \n \n This study analyzed data from the Kanagawa Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT or IV tPA. The study evaluated patients with acute DMVOs who were treated with EVT and/or IV tPA. DMVOs was defined as occlusions in M2–M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, or posterior cerebral artery. The analysis included primary DMVOs and excluded secondary DMVOs, such as distal embolism after recanalization of proximal vessel occlusion. Propensity score‐matched analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes between EVT and IV tPA alone. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 or no worsening at 90 days. An excellent outcome was defined as an modified Rankin Scale score 0–1.\n \n \n \n \n The study included 1148 patients with DMVOs, of whom 816 were treated with EVT and 332 were IV tPA alone. Before propensity score matching, the incidence of good and excellent outcomes was significantly lower in EVT group (good outcomes: EVT 50.3% versus IV tPA 68.0%;\n P\n  < 0.01; excellent outcomes: 39.8% versus 59.8%;\n P\n  < 0.001). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between EVT and IV tPA groups in good outcomes (EVT 57.8% versus IV tPA 61.3%;\n P\n  = 0.51), excellent outcomes (46.6% versus 55.0%;\n P\n  = 0.17), all cerebral hemorrhage (11.6% versus 12.7%;\n P\n  = 0.74), and symptomatic hemorrhage (2.9% versus 0.6%;\n P\n  = 0.13). Subarachnoid hemorrhage was more frequent in EVT group (14.5% versus IV tPA 0%).\n \n \n \n \n The benefits of EVT for acute DMVOs were similar to IV tPA alone. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to establish the superiority of EVT over IV tPA alone for DMVOs.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":" 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Alteplase For Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis\",\"authors\":\"T. Yoshie, T. Ueda, Y. Hasegawa, M. Takeuchi, M. Morimoto, Y. Tsuboi, R. Yamamoto, S. Kaku, J. Ayabe, T. Akiyama, D. Yamamoto, K. Mori, H. Kagami, H. Ito, Hidetaka Onodera, Y. Kaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Tatsuno, N. Usuki, S. Takaishi, Y. Yamano\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.123.001346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are not well established. This study aimed to determine the superiority of EVT over intravenous tissue‐type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) in the treatment of DMVOs.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study analyzed data from the Kanagawa Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT or IV tPA. The study evaluated patients with acute DMVOs who were treated with EVT and/or IV tPA. DMVOs was defined as occlusions in M2–M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, or posterior cerebral artery. The analysis included primary DMVOs and excluded secondary DMVOs, such as distal embolism after recanalization of proximal vessel occlusion. Propensity score‐matched analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes between EVT and IV tPA alone. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 or no worsening at 90 days. An excellent outcome was defined as an modified Rankin Scale score 0–1.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n The study included 1148 patients with DMVOs, of whom 816 were treated with EVT and 332 were IV tPA alone. Before propensity score matching, the incidence of good and excellent outcomes was significantly lower in EVT group (good outcomes: EVT 50.3% versus IV tPA 68.0%;\\n P\\n  < 0.01; excellent outcomes: 39.8% versus 59.8%;\\n P\\n  < 0.001). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between EVT and IV tPA groups in good outcomes (EVT 57.8% versus IV tPA 61.3%;\\n P\\n  = 0.51), excellent outcomes (46.6% versus 55.0%;\\n P\\n  = 0.17), all cerebral hemorrhage (11.6% versus 12.7%;\\n P\\n  = 0.74), and symptomatic hemorrhage (2.9% versus 0.6%;\\n P\\n  = 0.13). Subarachnoid hemorrhage was more frequent in EVT group (14.5% versus IV tPA 0%).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n The benefits of EVT for acute DMVOs were similar to IV tPA alone. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to establish the superiority of EVT over IV tPA alone for DMVOs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\" 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗远端中血管闭塞症(DMVOs)的疗效尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在确定在治疗DMVOs时,EVT是否优于静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV tPA)。 这项研究分析了神奈川急性缺血性卒中静脉和血管内治疗登记处的数据,该登记处是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性登记处,收治接受 EVT 或 IV tPA 治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者。该研究评估了接受 EVT 和/或 IV tPA 治疗的急性 DMVO 患者。DMVO定义为大脑中动脉、大脑前动脉或大脑后动脉M2-M3段闭塞。分析包括原发性 DMVO,但不包括继发性 DMVO,如近端血管闭塞再通后的远端栓塞。为了比较 EVT 和单独静脉注射 tPA 的疗效,进行了倾向评分匹配分析。良好预后的定义是改良Rankin量表评分为0-2分或90天后无恶化。改良Rankin量表评分为0-1分即为优良疗效。 该研究纳入了1148名DMVO患者,其中816人接受了EVT治疗,332人接受了单纯静脉注射tPA治疗。在进行倾向评分匹配之前,EVT 组的良好和优秀预后发生率明显较低(良好预后:EVT 50.3%;优秀预后:EVT 50.3%;EVT 50.3%):EVT为50.3%,IV tPA为68.0%;P<0.01;优良率为39.8%,IV tPA为59.8%:39.8%对59.8%;P<0.001)。经过倾向评分匹配后,EVT 组和 IV tPA 组在良好预后(EVT 57.8% 对 IV tPA 61.3%;P = 0.51)、优秀预后(46.6% 对 55.0%;P = 0.17)、所有脑出血(11.6% 对 12.7%;P = 0.74)和症状性出血(2.9% 对 0.6%;P = 0.13)方面无显著差异。EVT组蛛网膜下腔出血的发生率更高(14.5%对IV tPA 0%)。 EVT对急性DMVO的治疗效果与单纯静脉注射tPA相似。有必要进行随机多中心试验,以确定EVT对DMVOs的疗效优于单纯静脉注射tPA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Alteplase For Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis
The benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are not well established. This study aimed to determine the superiority of EVT over intravenous tissue‐type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) in the treatment of DMVOs. This study analyzed data from the Kanagawa Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT or IV tPA. The study evaluated patients with acute DMVOs who were treated with EVT and/or IV tPA. DMVOs was defined as occlusions in M2–M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, or posterior cerebral artery. The analysis included primary DMVOs and excluded secondary DMVOs, such as distal embolism after recanalization of proximal vessel occlusion. Propensity score‐matched analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes between EVT and IV tPA alone. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 or no worsening at 90 days. An excellent outcome was defined as an modified Rankin Scale score 0–1. The study included 1148 patients with DMVOs, of whom 816 were treated with EVT and 332 were IV tPA alone. Before propensity score matching, the incidence of good and excellent outcomes was significantly lower in EVT group (good outcomes: EVT 50.3% versus IV tPA 68.0%; P  < 0.01; excellent outcomes: 39.8% versus 59.8%; P  < 0.001). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between EVT and IV tPA groups in good outcomes (EVT 57.8% versus IV tPA 61.3%; P  = 0.51), excellent outcomes (46.6% versus 55.0%; P  = 0.17), all cerebral hemorrhage (11.6% versus 12.7%; P  = 0.74), and symptomatic hemorrhage (2.9% versus 0.6%; P  = 0.13). Subarachnoid hemorrhage was more frequent in EVT group (14.5% versus IV tPA 0%). The benefits of EVT for acute DMVOs were similar to IV tPA alone. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to establish the superiority of EVT over IV tPA alone for DMVOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1