A. Porreca, Neil Rude, Kyle Broadway, Joseph Parkos
{"title":"种间形态差异会影响螃蟹幼鱼的觅食效率吗?","authors":"A. Porreca, Neil Rude, Kyle Broadway, Joseph Parkos","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2024-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sympatric black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lesueur in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829) and white crappie (P. annularis Rafinesque, 1818) often differ in ecological performance, such that white crappie outnumber black crappie in turbid waterbodies and black crappie predominate in clear waters with abundant cover. Recent work suggests this performance difference is driven by juvenile white crappie having a limnetic body form and juvenile black crappie having a littoral body form, resulting in differential predation mortality between the species within open-water and vegetated environments. We tested whether these morphologies also lead to interspecific differences in foraging efficiency between the congeners in structure and open water. Juvenile black crappie spent more time pursuing fish prey than white crappie across all trials, suggesting that energetic gains of piscivory may differ between species. However, both species had similar capture efficiencies when attacking fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, 1820) within vegetated and open-water habitats. We conclude that variation in morphology between juvenile black crappie and white crappie does not have a large influence on foraging efficiency, at least on fish prey, in dense cover or open water, and suggest their performance in sympatry is likely not driven by predatory capabilities at the onset of piscivory within these different environmental contexts. Instead, the relationship between morphology and predator evasion may drive the distribution and relative abundance of crappie species within sympatric populations.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do interspecific differences in morphology influence foraging efficiency of juvenile crappie?\",\"authors\":\"A. Porreca, Neil Rude, Kyle Broadway, Joseph Parkos\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjz-2024-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sympatric black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lesueur in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829) and white crappie (P. annularis Rafinesque, 1818) often differ in ecological performance, such that white crappie outnumber black crappie in turbid waterbodies and black crappie predominate in clear waters with abundant cover. Recent work suggests this performance difference is driven by juvenile white crappie having a limnetic body form and juvenile black crappie having a littoral body form, resulting in differential predation mortality between the species within open-water and vegetated environments. We tested whether these morphologies also lead to interspecific differences in foraging efficiency between the congeners in structure and open water. Juvenile black crappie spent more time pursuing fish prey than white crappie across all trials, suggesting that energetic gains of piscivory may differ between species. However, both species had similar capture efficiencies when attacking fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, 1820) within vegetated and open-water habitats. We conclude that variation in morphology between juvenile black crappie and white crappie does not have a large influence on foraging efficiency, at least on fish prey, in dense cover or open water, and suggest their performance in sympatry is likely not driven by predatory capabilities at the onset of piscivory within these different environmental contexts. Instead, the relationship between morphology and predator evasion may drive the distribution and relative abundance of crappie species within sympatric populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" 46\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2024-0030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2024-0030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
同域的黑螃蟹(Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lesueur in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829)和白螃蟹(P. annularis Rafinesque, 1818)通常在生态表现上有所不同,例如,在浑浊的水体中,白螃蟹的数量超过黑螃蟹,而在有丰富覆盖物的清澈水体中,黑螃蟹占优势。最近的研究表明,这种生态表现差异是由于白螃蟹幼鱼具有边缘体型,而黑螃蟹幼鱼具有沿岸体型,从而导致开放水域和植被环境中不同物种的捕食死亡率不同。我们测试了这些形态是否也会导致同种鱼类在结构和开放水域中觅食效率的种间差异。在所有试验中,幼年黑螃蟹比白螃蟹花更多时间捕食鱼类猎物,这表明不同物种捕食鱼类获得的能量收益可能不同。然而,在有植被和开阔水域生境中,两种鱼类在攻击黑头鲦(Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, 1820)时的捕获效率相似。我们的结论是,黑螃蟹和白螃蟹幼鱼之间的形态差异不会对觅食效率产生很大影响,至少不会影响它们在茂密植被或开阔水域中捕食鱼类猎物的效率。相反,形态与躲避捕食者之间的关系可能会驱动螃蟹物种在同域种群中的分布和相对丰度。
Do interspecific differences in morphology influence foraging efficiency of juvenile crappie?
Sympatric black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lesueur in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829) and white crappie (P. annularis Rafinesque, 1818) often differ in ecological performance, such that white crappie outnumber black crappie in turbid waterbodies and black crappie predominate in clear waters with abundant cover. Recent work suggests this performance difference is driven by juvenile white crappie having a limnetic body form and juvenile black crappie having a littoral body form, resulting in differential predation mortality between the species within open-water and vegetated environments. We tested whether these morphologies also lead to interspecific differences in foraging efficiency between the congeners in structure and open water. Juvenile black crappie spent more time pursuing fish prey than white crappie across all trials, suggesting that energetic gains of piscivory may differ between species. However, both species had similar capture efficiencies when attacking fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, 1820) within vegetated and open-water habitats. We conclude that variation in morphology between juvenile black crappie and white crappie does not have a large influence on foraging efficiency, at least on fish prey, in dense cover or open water, and suggest their performance in sympatry is likely not driven by predatory capabilities at the onset of piscivory within these different environmental contexts. Instead, the relationship between morphology and predator evasion may drive the distribution and relative abundance of crappie species within sympatric populations.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.