A - 51 研究认知在精英运动员下肢肌肉骨骼损伤和脑震荡风险中的作用

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae052.51
I. J. Sewell, T. Romeas, J. Deslauriers, S. Leclerc, M. Wojtowicz
{"title":"A - 51 研究认知在精英运动员下肢肌肉骨骼损伤和脑震荡风险中的作用","authors":"I. J. Sewell, T. Romeas, J. Deslauriers, S. Leclerc, M. Wojtowicz","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Recent evidence suggests a relationship between cognitive performance and the risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal (LEMSK) injury, and that concussion may also increase the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury, though these relationships have been largely examined in isolation. This study examined associations between pre-season cognitive performance and the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury and concussion among elite athletes.\n \n \n \n An observational study of elite/international-level athletes from a Canadian national sport institute. 146 athletes (female = 87) across six different sports completed pre-season cognitive testing (Vienna Test System) between 2018 and 2023. Subsequent LEMSK injuries and concussions during the year following pre-season cognitive testing were documented via an injury surveillance program.\n \n \n \n Pre-season cognitive performance was similar in athletes with (n = 24) and without (n = 122) a subsequent concussion, and those with (n = 100) and without (n = 46) a subsequent LEMSK (ps > 0.05). Athletes with both a subsequent LEMSK and concussion had slower baseline reaction time on a task of stress reactivity (n = 16; median RT = 0.74 s) compared to athletes with only a subsequent LEMSK (n = 84; median RT = 0.69 s; V = 900.5, p = 0.019). Concussion history was a significant predictor of both subsequent LEMSK (B = 0.94, p = 0.017) and the number of subsequent LEMSK (B = 1.23, p < 0.01). Faster RTs on inhibition tests were predictors of subsequent number of LEMSK, while controlling for concussion history (B = -10.21, p = 0.045; B = -10.60, p = 0.017).\n \n \n \n Identifying risk factors for LEMSK injuries and concussions is critical for preventing future injuries. These preliminary results suggest a relationship between baseline reaction time performance and combined subsequent LEMSK and concussion injury.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A - 51 Examining the Role of Cognition in Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injury and Concussion Risk in Elite Athletes\",\"authors\":\"I. J. Sewell, T. Romeas, J. Deslauriers, S. Leclerc, M. Wojtowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae052.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Recent evidence suggests a relationship between cognitive performance and the risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal (LEMSK) injury, and that concussion may also increase the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury, though these relationships have been largely examined in isolation. This study examined associations between pre-season cognitive performance and the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury and concussion among elite athletes.\\n \\n \\n \\n An observational study of elite/international-level athletes from a Canadian national sport institute. 146 athletes (female = 87) across six different sports completed pre-season cognitive testing (Vienna Test System) between 2018 and 2023. Subsequent LEMSK injuries and concussions during the year following pre-season cognitive testing were documented via an injury surveillance program.\\n \\n \\n \\n Pre-season cognitive performance was similar in athletes with (n = 24) and without (n = 122) a subsequent concussion, and those with (n = 100) and without (n = 46) a subsequent LEMSK (ps > 0.05). Athletes with both a subsequent LEMSK and concussion had slower baseline reaction time on a task of stress reactivity (n = 16; median RT = 0.74 s) compared to athletes with only a subsequent LEMSK (n = 84; median RT = 0.69 s; V = 900.5, p = 0.019). Concussion history was a significant predictor of both subsequent LEMSK (B = 0.94, p = 0.017) and the number of subsequent LEMSK (B = 1.23, p < 0.01). Faster RTs on inhibition tests were predictors of subsequent number of LEMSK, while controlling for concussion history (B = -10.21, p = 0.045; B = -10.60, p = 0.017).\\n \\n \\n \\n Identifying risk factors for LEMSK injuries and concussions is critical for preventing future injuries. These preliminary results suggest a relationship between baseline reaction time performance and combined subsequent LEMSK and concussion injury.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.51\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.51","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的证据表明,认知能力与下肢肌肉骨骼损伤(LEMSK)风险之间存在关系,脑震荡也可能增加随后的下肢肌肉骨骼损伤风险,尽管这些关系在很大程度上是孤立研究的。本研究考察了精英运动员在赛季前的认知表现与随后的 LEMSK 损伤和脑震荡风险之间的关系。 这是一项针对加拿大国家体育学院精英/国际级运动员的观察性研究。在 2018 年至 2023 年期间,来自六个不同运动项目的 146 名运动员(女性 = 87 人)完成了季前认知测试(维也纳测试系统)。在季前认知测试后的一年中,通过损伤监测计划记录了随后的 LEMSK 损伤和脑震荡。 有(n = 24)和没有(n = 122)后续脑震荡的运动员,以及有(n = 100)和没有(n = 46)后续 LEMSK 的运动员的季前认知表现相似(PS > 0.05)。在压力反应性任务中,既有后续 LEMSK 又有脑震荡的运动员(n = 16;RT 中位数 = 0.74 秒)与仅有后续 LEMSK 的运动员(n = 84;RT 中位数 = 0.69 秒;V = 900.5,p = 0.019)相比,基线反应时间较慢。脑震荡史对随后的LEMSK(B = 0.94,p = 0.017)和随后的LEMSK次数(B = 1.23,p < 0.01)都有明显的预测作用。在控制脑震荡病史的情况下,抑制测试中更快的RT是随后LEMSK次数的预测因素(B = -10.21,p = 0.045;B = -10.60,p = 0.017)。 识别 LEMSK 损伤和脑震荡的风险因素对于预防未来的损伤至关重要。这些初步结果表明,基线反应时间表现与随后的 LEMSK 损伤和脑震荡综合损伤之间存在关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A - 51 Examining the Role of Cognition in Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injury and Concussion Risk in Elite Athletes
Recent evidence suggests a relationship between cognitive performance and the risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal (LEMSK) injury, and that concussion may also increase the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury, though these relationships have been largely examined in isolation. This study examined associations between pre-season cognitive performance and the risk of subsequent LEMSK injury and concussion among elite athletes. An observational study of elite/international-level athletes from a Canadian national sport institute. 146 athletes (female = 87) across six different sports completed pre-season cognitive testing (Vienna Test System) between 2018 and 2023. Subsequent LEMSK injuries and concussions during the year following pre-season cognitive testing were documented via an injury surveillance program. Pre-season cognitive performance was similar in athletes with (n = 24) and without (n = 122) a subsequent concussion, and those with (n = 100) and without (n = 46) a subsequent LEMSK (ps > 0.05). Athletes with both a subsequent LEMSK and concussion had slower baseline reaction time on a task of stress reactivity (n = 16; median RT = 0.74 s) compared to athletes with only a subsequent LEMSK (n = 84; median RT = 0.69 s; V = 900.5, p = 0.019). Concussion history was a significant predictor of both subsequent LEMSK (B = 0.94, p = 0.017) and the number of subsequent LEMSK (B = 1.23, p < 0.01). Faster RTs on inhibition tests were predictors of subsequent number of LEMSK, while controlling for concussion history (B = -10.21, p = 0.045; B = -10.60, p = 0.017). Identifying risk factors for LEMSK injuries and concussions is critical for preventing future injuries. These preliminary results suggest a relationship between baseline reaction time performance and combined subsequent LEMSK and concussion injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Executive Functions are Independently Associated with Cognitive Dispersion in HIV Disease. Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile. Examining Food-Specific and General Inhibitory Control and Working Memory as Moderators of Relations Between Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Eating Pathology in Adults With Overweight/Obesity: A Preregistered, Cross-Sectional Study. Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age. A Systematic Review to Explore a Neuropsychological Profile that Predates Anorexia Nervosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1