大腿中部等距拉力峰值和对称性在前十字韧带重建康复阶段的变化

Johannes P. J. Stofberg, K. Aginsky, Mariaan van Aswegen, Mark Kramer
{"title":"大腿中部等距拉力峰值和对称性在前十字韧带重建康复阶段的变化","authors":"Johannes P. J. Stofberg, K. Aginsky, Mariaan van Aswegen, Mark Kramer","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1418270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether functionally relevant strength assessments, such as the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), can be used either bilaterally or unilaterally to evaluate and guide rehabilitation progress in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is under-researched. This study assessed changes in peak force (PF) and asymmetry across 3 phases for bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments in patients with ACLR. Peak isometric force from the IMTP was compared to peak torque from isokinetic dynamometry as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured individuals.Participants (ACLR, n = 15) completed bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments at weeks 12 (baseline), 16 (phase 3), and 20 (phase 4) of rehabilitation to evaluate changes in PF and asymmetry. Asymmetry was evaluated using the asymmetry angle. Isometric data from the IMTP were compared to that from an isokinetic dynamometer as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured participants (n = 63) allowing for a detailed analysis of limb-specific force production.The PF during the bilateral IMTP increased for both the injured (0.94 N/kg) and uninjured (0.26 N/kg) limbs from baseline to phase 4, whereas the PF of the injured limb increased by 1.5 N/kg during the unilateral IMTP in the same time frame. Asymmetry values systematically reduced by ∼1% and ∼0.5% for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP tests from baseline to phase 4. Significant differences in PF of the injured limb were evident between those with ACLR and healthy controls across all phases (p = 0.022–0.001). The rate of progression in PF capacity was dependent on test type, amounting to 0.1 and 0.2 body weights per week for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP respectively. Small-to-large correlations (r = 0.12–0.88) were evident between IMTP PF and peak torque from the isokinetic dynamometer as well as between asymmetry metrics from both tests.The findings suggest that IMTP PF has potential for monitoring changes in PF and asymmetry during the ACLR rehabilitation progress. Both injured limb and uninjured limb show improvement in force-generating capacity, implying a positive adaptation to rehabilitation protocols. The findings highlight that ACLR is a unilateral injury that requires bilateral rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":507590,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force and symmetry across anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation phases\",\"authors\":\"Johannes P. J. Stofberg, K. Aginsky, Mariaan van Aswegen, Mark Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2024.1418270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether functionally relevant strength assessments, such as the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), can be used either bilaterally or unilaterally to evaluate and guide rehabilitation progress in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is under-researched. This study assessed changes in peak force (PF) and asymmetry across 3 phases for bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments in patients with ACLR. Peak isometric force from the IMTP was compared to peak torque from isokinetic dynamometry as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured individuals.Participants (ACLR, n = 15) completed bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments at weeks 12 (baseline), 16 (phase 3), and 20 (phase 4) of rehabilitation to evaluate changes in PF and asymmetry. Asymmetry was evaluated using the asymmetry angle. Isometric data from the IMTP were compared to that from an isokinetic dynamometer as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured participants (n = 63) allowing for a detailed analysis of limb-specific force production.The PF during the bilateral IMTP increased for both the injured (0.94 N/kg) and uninjured (0.26 N/kg) limbs from baseline to phase 4, whereas the PF of the injured limb increased by 1.5 N/kg during the unilateral IMTP in the same time frame. Asymmetry values systematically reduced by ∼1% and ∼0.5% for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP tests from baseline to phase 4. Significant differences in PF of the injured limb were evident between those with ACLR and healthy controls across all phases (p = 0.022–0.001). The rate of progression in PF capacity was dependent on test type, amounting to 0.1 and 0.2 body weights per week for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP respectively. Small-to-large correlations (r = 0.12–0.88) were evident between IMTP PF and peak torque from the isokinetic dynamometer as well as between asymmetry metrics from both tests.The findings suggest that IMTP PF has potential for monitoring changes in PF and asymmetry during the ACLR rehabilitation progress. Both injured limb and uninjured limb show improvement in force-generating capacity, implying a positive adaptation to rehabilitation protocols. The findings highlight that ACLR is a unilateral injury that requires bilateral rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1418270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1418270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于与功能相关的力量评估(如等长大腿中部牵拉(IMTP))是否可用于双侧或单侧评估和指导前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者的康复进展,研究尚不充分。本研究评估了前交叉韧带重建患者在双侧和单侧 IMTP 评估的 3 个阶段中峰值力(PF)和不对称的变化。参与者(前交叉韧带损伤,n = 15)在康复的第 12 周(基线)、第 16 周(第 3 阶段)和第 20 周(第 4 阶段)完成了双侧和单侧 IMTP 评估,以评估 PF 和不对称性的变化。不对称度使用不对称角进行评估。从基线到第 4 阶段,受伤肢体(0.94 牛/公斤)和未受伤肢体(0.26 牛/公斤)在双侧 IMTP 期间的 PF 均有所增加,而受伤肢体在单侧 IMTP 期间的 PF 在同一时间内增加了 1.5 牛/公斤。从基线到第 4 阶段,双侧和单侧 IMTP 测试的不对称值分别降低了 1% 和 0.5%。在所有阶段中,前交叉韧带损伤者和健康对照组的受伤肢体的PF均存在明显差异(p = 0.022-0.001)。PF能力的进展速度取决于测试类型,双侧和单侧IMTP的进展速度分别为每周0.1和0.2体重。研究结果表明,在前交叉韧带损伤(ACLR)康复过程中,IMTP PF 具有监测 PF 和不对称变化的潜力。受伤肢体和未受伤肢体的发力能力都有所提高,这意味着对康复方案有积极的适应性。研究结果突出表明,前交叉韧带损伤是一种单侧损伤,需要进行双侧康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force and symmetry across anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation phases
Whether functionally relevant strength assessments, such as the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), can be used either bilaterally or unilaterally to evaluate and guide rehabilitation progress in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is under-researched. This study assessed changes in peak force (PF) and asymmetry across 3 phases for bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments in patients with ACLR. Peak isometric force from the IMTP was compared to peak torque from isokinetic dynamometry as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured individuals.Participants (ACLR, n = 15) completed bilateral and unilateral IMTP assessments at weeks 12 (baseline), 16 (phase 3), and 20 (phase 4) of rehabilitation to evaluate changes in PF and asymmetry. Asymmetry was evaluated using the asymmetry angle. Isometric data from the IMTP were compared to that from an isokinetic dynamometer as well as against a cohort of healthy, uninjured participants (n = 63) allowing for a detailed analysis of limb-specific force production.The PF during the bilateral IMTP increased for both the injured (0.94 N/kg) and uninjured (0.26 N/kg) limbs from baseline to phase 4, whereas the PF of the injured limb increased by 1.5 N/kg during the unilateral IMTP in the same time frame. Asymmetry values systematically reduced by ∼1% and ∼0.5% for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP tests from baseline to phase 4. Significant differences in PF of the injured limb were evident between those with ACLR and healthy controls across all phases (p = 0.022–0.001). The rate of progression in PF capacity was dependent on test type, amounting to 0.1 and 0.2 body weights per week for the bilateral and unilateral IMTP respectively. Small-to-large correlations (r = 0.12–0.88) were evident between IMTP PF and peak torque from the isokinetic dynamometer as well as between asymmetry metrics from both tests.The findings suggest that IMTP PF has potential for monitoring changes in PF and asymmetry during the ACLR rehabilitation progress. Both injured limb and uninjured limb show improvement in force-generating capacity, implying a positive adaptation to rehabilitation protocols. The findings highlight that ACLR is a unilateral injury that requires bilateral rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICF in Bachelor degree programs—the implementation of the ICF in the clinical reasoning process of physical therapists for neurological patients—optimizing the health curriculum for comprehensive patient care Assessing proprioception in children with upper motor neuron lesions: feasibility, validity, and reliability of the proprioception measurement tool “Pain is not typically taken into consideration due to him being nonverbal”- emergency department experiences among persons with disabilities: a mixed methods study in Kingston, Ontario Proximal auditory AR rehabilitation: system integration and wellness applications—from hearing support up toward vestibular rehabilitation Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature—a mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1