{"title":"信息技术领域的数字行政--回顾:山区经济的启示","authors":"Mihai Covaci, Brindusa Covaci","doi":"10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research explores the challenges and advancements in global digital administration, focusing on IoT-driven internet administration. The study proposes hypotheses on digital administration performance and offers insights of IT administration. The scholarly contribution introduces a comprehensive framework with five interconnected indicators for measuring digital administration. These indicators, aligned with hypotheses, assess the socio-economic impact of IT, incorporating complex mathematical formulations. The study utilizes empirical data from reliable sources and employs rigorous statistical analysis, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to enhance understanding within the IT administration realm. The study examines IT governance in EU, BRICS, and MENA countries through tangible assets. Findings highlight varied resilience levels and advocate for strategic investments, emphasizing the pivotal role of IT in economic development and governance across different intervals. The analysis extends to e-IT governance, digital governance technology, and digital corporate governance technology, demonstrating their impact on socio-economic environments, business performance, and IT development in mountain areas. Within this contextual framework, the authors posit several hypotheses concerning digital administration performance: H1. A robust quality of public and private administration correlates with a strong national economy; additionally, heightened IT administration strength augments general administration – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H2. Development influences administration in the Research-Development-Innovation (RDI) sector, with the IT part paramount importance – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H3. Digital administration within an electronic context should foster resilience in the socioeconomic environment of a country – as indicated by the Value Added of e-IT administration from a country (B). H4. Public and private administration, particularly in IT administration, operates under the auspices of technical development – as indicated by the Value Added of digital administration technology from a country (C). H5. IT administration and the overall digital administration environment exert influence on business performance – as indicated by the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology from a country (D), and additionally, the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology in the mountain area (E). Results underscore the interconnectedness of governance quality, development, resilience, and technical advancement in the evolving landscape of digital administration.","PeriodicalId":510932,"journal":{"name":"Academic Review","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIGITAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE – A REVIEW: INSIGHTS FROM MOUNTAIN ECONOMY\",\"authors\":\"Mihai Covaci, Brindusa Covaci\",\"doi\":\"10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research explores the challenges and advancements in global digital administration, focusing on IoT-driven internet administration. The study proposes hypotheses on digital administration performance and offers insights of IT administration. The scholarly contribution introduces a comprehensive framework with five interconnected indicators for measuring digital administration. These indicators, aligned with hypotheses, assess the socio-economic impact of IT, incorporating complex mathematical formulations. The study utilizes empirical data from reliable sources and employs rigorous statistical analysis, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to enhance understanding within the IT administration realm. The study examines IT governance in EU, BRICS, and MENA countries through tangible assets. Findings highlight varied resilience levels and advocate for strategic investments, emphasizing the pivotal role of IT in economic development and governance across different intervals. The analysis extends to e-IT governance, digital governance technology, and digital corporate governance technology, demonstrating their impact on socio-economic environments, business performance, and IT development in mountain areas. Within this contextual framework, the authors posit several hypotheses concerning digital administration performance: H1. A robust quality of public and private administration correlates with a strong national economy; additionally, heightened IT administration strength augments general administration – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H2. Development influences administration in the Research-Development-Innovation (RDI) sector, with the IT part paramount importance – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H3. Digital administration within an electronic context should foster resilience in the socioeconomic environment of a country – as indicated by the Value Added of e-IT administration from a country (B). H4. Public and private administration, particularly in IT administration, operates under the auspices of technical development – as indicated by the Value Added of digital administration technology from a country (C). H5. IT administration and the overall digital administration environment exert influence on business performance – as indicated by the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology from a country (D), and additionally, the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology in the mountain area (E). Results underscore the interconnectedness of governance quality, development, resilience, and technical advancement in the evolving landscape of digital administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Review\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究探讨了全球数字管理的挑战和进步,重点关注物联网驱动的互联网管理。研究提出了关于数字管理绩效的假设,并提供了对信息技术管理的见解。学术贡献介绍了一个综合框架,其中包含五个相互关联的数字管理衡量指标。这些指标与假设相一致,评估了信息技术对社会经济的影响,并结合了复杂的数学公式。本研究利用可靠来源的经验数据,采用严格的统计分析,结合定性和定量方法,加深对信息技术管理领域的理解。研究通过有形资产对欧盟、金砖国家和中东及北非国家的 IT 管理进行了考察。研究结果凸显了不同的复原力水平,并倡导战略投资,强调了信息技术在不同区间的经济发展和治理中的关键作用。分析扩展到电子信息技术治理、数字治理技术和数字公司治理技术,展示了它们对山区社会经济环境、企业绩效和信息技术发展的影响。在这一背景框架下,作者提出了有关数字管理绩效的几个假设:H1.健全的公共和私人行政管理质量与强大的国民经济息息相关;此外,IT 行政管理实力的增强还能提高总体行政管理水平--这体现在一个国家的 IT 行政管理有形资产增加值(A)上。H2.发展影响研究-开发-创新(RDI)部门的行政管理,其中 IT 部分最为重要--如一国 IT 行政管理有形资产增加值(A)所示。H3.电子背景下的数字化行政管理应促进国家社会经济环境的复原力--如一国的 电子信息技术行政管理附加值所示(B)。H4.公共和私人行政,特别是信息技术行政,在技术发展的支持下运作--如一国的 数字行政技术附加值所示(C)。H5.信息技术管理和整体数字管理环境对企业绩效产生影响--如国家数字企业管理技术附加值(D)和山区数字企业管理技术附加值(E)所示。研究结果表明,在不断演变的数字行政管理环境中,治理质量、发展、复原力和技术进步相互关联。
DIGITAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE – A REVIEW: INSIGHTS FROM MOUNTAIN ECONOMY
The research explores the challenges and advancements in global digital administration, focusing on IoT-driven internet administration. The study proposes hypotheses on digital administration performance and offers insights of IT administration. The scholarly contribution introduces a comprehensive framework with five interconnected indicators for measuring digital administration. These indicators, aligned with hypotheses, assess the socio-economic impact of IT, incorporating complex mathematical formulations. The study utilizes empirical data from reliable sources and employs rigorous statistical analysis, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to enhance understanding within the IT administration realm. The study examines IT governance in EU, BRICS, and MENA countries through tangible assets. Findings highlight varied resilience levels and advocate for strategic investments, emphasizing the pivotal role of IT in economic development and governance across different intervals. The analysis extends to e-IT governance, digital governance technology, and digital corporate governance technology, demonstrating their impact on socio-economic environments, business performance, and IT development in mountain areas. Within this contextual framework, the authors posit several hypotheses concerning digital administration performance: H1. A robust quality of public and private administration correlates with a strong national economy; additionally, heightened IT administration strength augments general administration – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H2. Development influences administration in the Research-Development-Innovation (RDI) sector, with the IT part paramount importance – as indicated by the Value Added of IT administration tangible assets from a country (A). H3. Digital administration within an electronic context should foster resilience in the socioeconomic environment of a country – as indicated by the Value Added of e-IT administration from a country (B). H4. Public and private administration, particularly in IT administration, operates under the auspices of technical development – as indicated by the Value Added of digital administration technology from a country (C). H5. IT administration and the overall digital administration environment exert influence on business performance – as indicated by the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology from a country (D), and additionally, the Value Added of digital corporate administration technology in the mountain area (E). Results underscore the interconnectedness of governance quality, development, resilience, and technical advancement in the evolving landscape of digital administration.