通过考虑土-结构相互作用,评估单、双调谐质量阻尼器降低建筑物响应的效率

Mostafa Roozbahan, Gürsoy Turan
{"title":"通过考虑土-结构相互作用,评估单、双调谐质量阻尼器降低建筑物响应的效率","authors":"Mostafa Roozbahan,&nbsp;Gürsoy Turan","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01103-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMDs) are among the simplest, most reliable, and most frequently employed structural control devices. The efficiency of TMDs and MTMDs depends on their parameters, including the mass, frequency ratio, and damping ratio. Several analytical and metaheuristic methods have been proposed for the optimal design of tuned mass dampers. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate the differences in efficiency between a number of TMD design methods and (2) to evaluate the differences in efficiency between a single TMD and double TMD (DTMD) in reducing the seismic response of structures by considering soil-structure interactions (SSI). In the first numerical study, the effectiveness of TMDs optimized using seven analytical methods, and TMD and DTMD optimized using a metaheuristics algorithm called Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) in reducing the response of a fifteen-story structure under 22 far-field and 14 near-field earthquakes is compared. In the second example, in addition to the seven analytical-based designed TMDs, and MBF-based TMDs and DTMDs, the Jaya algorithm based, and plasma generation optimization-based designed TMDs are used, and the same procedure is applied to a forty-story structure. The results show that there is no important difference among these methods, which may indicate that the uppermost optimization level for a regular TMD has been reached. Furthermore, the results indicate that the TMD and DTMD are almost equally effective at reducing the seismic response of structures when the SSI effect is taken into consideration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5137 - 5152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency evaluation of single and double tuned mass dampers on building response reduction by considering soil-structure interaction\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Roozbahan,&nbsp;Gürsoy Turan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-024-01103-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMDs) are among the simplest, most reliable, and most frequently employed structural control devices. The efficiency of TMDs and MTMDs depends on their parameters, including the mass, frequency ratio, and damping ratio. Several analytical and metaheuristic methods have been proposed for the optimal design of tuned mass dampers. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate the differences in efficiency between a number of TMD design methods and (2) to evaluate the differences in efficiency between a single TMD and double TMD (DTMD) in reducing the seismic response of structures by considering soil-structure interactions (SSI). In the first numerical study, the effectiveness of TMDs optimized using seven analytical methods, and TMD and DTMD optimized using a metaheuristics algorithm called Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) in reducing the response of a fifteen-story structure under 22 far-field and 14 near-field earthquakes is compared. In the second example, in addition to the seven analytical-based designed TMDs, and MBF-based TMDs and DTMDs, the Jaya algorithm based, and plasma generation optimization-based designed TMDs are used, and the same procedure is applied to a forty-story structure. The results show that there is no important difference among these methods, which may indicate that the uppermost optimization level for a regular TMD has been reached. Furthermore, the results indicate that the TMD and DTMD are almost equally effective at reducing the seismic response of structures when the SSI effect is taken into consideration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"5137 - 5152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01103-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01103-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)和多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)是最简单、最可靠和最常用的结构控制装置。TMD 和 MTMD 的效率取决于其参数,包括质量、频率比和阻尼比。针对调谐质量阻尼器的优化设计,已经提出了几种分析和元启发式方法。本研究的目的是(1) 研究若干调谐质量阻尼器设计方法之间的效率差异;(2) 通过考虑土壤-结构相互作用 (SSI),评估单调谐质量阻尼器和双调谐质量阻尼器 (DTMD) 在降低结构地震响应方面的效率差异。在第一个数值研究中,比较了在 22 次远场地震和 14 次近场地震下,使用七种分析方法优化的 TMD,以及使用一种名为 "鱼口编码"(MBF)的元启发式算法优化的 TMD 和 DTMD 在降低 15 层结构地震响应方面的有效性。在第二个例子中,除了七个基于分析的设计 TMD、基于 MBF 的 TMD 和 DTMD 外,还使用了基于 Jaya 算法和基于等离子生成优化的设计 TMD,并将相同的程序应用于一个四十层的结构。结果表明,这些方法之间没有明显差异,这可能表明普通 TMD 已达到最高优化水平。此外,结果表明,当考虑到 SSI 效应时,TMD 和 DTMD 在降低结构的地震响应方面几乎同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency evaluation of single and double tuned mass dampers on building response reduction by considering soil-structure interaction

Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMDs) are among the simplest, most reliable, and most frequently employed structural control devices. The efficiency of TMDs and MTMDs depends on their parameters, including the mass, frequency ratio, and damping ratio. Several analytical and metaheuristic methods have been proposed for the optimal design of tuned mass dampers. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate the differences in efficiency between a number of TMD design methods and (2) to evaluate the differences in efficiency between a single TMD and double TMD (DTMD) in reducing the seismic response of structures by considering soil-structure interactions (SSI). In the first numerical study, the effectiveness of TMDs optimized using seven analytical methods, and TMD and DTMD optimized using a metaheuristics algorithm called Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) in reducing the response of a fifteen-story structure under 22 far-field and 14 near-field earthquakes is compared. In the second example, in addition to the seven analytical-based designed TMDs, and MBF-based TMDs and DTMDs, the Jaya algorithm based, and plasma generation optimization-based designed TMDs are used, and the same procedure is applied to a forty-story structure. The results show that there is no important difference among these methods, which may indicate that the uppermost optimization level for a regular TMD has been reached. Furthermore, the results indicate that the TMD and DTMD are almost equally effective at reducing the seismic response of structures when the SSI effect is taken into consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
Axial compressive behavior of square CFST short columns with steel plate reinforcement Machine learning-based prediction and optimization of mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete A metaheuristic–machine learning framework for modeling and improving the thermal behavior of bio-based wall panel systems in residential buildings Explainable AI based ML models for predicting the flexural strength of basalt fiber reinforced concrete using SHAP, LIME, PDP Structural and performance optimization of GGBS–fly ash–CNT-based M40 concrete U-drains under IRC loadings using FEM and multi-objective optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1