从专家角度看尼泊尔炊事能源转型的技术选择

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Clean Energy Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1093/ce/zkae035
Dipesh Kc, S. P. Lohani, Poushan Shrestha, Chunyu Xue
{"title":"从专家角度看尼泊尔炊事能源转型的技术选择","authors":"Dipesh Kc, S. P. Lohani, Poushan Shrestha, Chunyu Xue","doi":"10.1093/ce/zkae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Solid biomass dominates as the primary source of cooking energy, especially in rural households of Nepal. The use of solid biomass has a detrimental effect on health, exacerbates the burden of biomass collection, and hampers access to clean energy. Understanding the factors influencing the choice of modern cooking fuels is crucial to improving energy security and resilience and easing the transition to clean fuels. This study evaluates technological choices for the transition in cooking energy from the perspective of experts working in the government, non-government, and academia sectors. A structured questionnaire survey was prepared with five criteria and nine cooking technology options. Fifty-one experts responded to the survey, and their responses were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process. The study reveals that efficiency and capital cost are the primary criteria for selecting cooking technology. The most suitable clean cooking technology is an induction stove followed by a hot plate, while the least preferred technology is a Bayupankhi stove followed by two-pothole mud improved cooking stoves. To ensure the robustness of the method, sensitivity analysis was performed on the two primary criteria efficiency and capital cost of the cooking technology. The analysis revealed robust and consistent rankings of technologies. This study should help create a conducive environment for relevant stakeholders and policymakers to formulate and implement relevant policies and strategies to accelerate the cooking energy transition in Nepal.","PeriodicalId":36703,"journal":{"name":"Clean Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert perspective on technological choice for cooking energy transition in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Dipesh Kc, S. P. Lohani, Poushan Shrestha, Chunyu Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ce/zkae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Solid biomass dominates as the primary source of cooking energy, especially in rural households of Nepal. The use of solid biomass has a detrimental effect on health, exacerbates the burden of biomass collection, and hampers access to clean energy. Understanding the factors influencing the choice of modern cooking fuels is crucial to improving energy security and resilience and easing the transition to clean fuels. This study evaluates technological choices for the transition in cooking energy from the perspective of experts working in the government, non-government, and academia sectors. A structured questionnaire survey was prepared with five criteria and nine cooking technology options. Fifty-one experts responded to the survey, and their responses were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process. The study reveals that efficiency and capital cost are the primary criteria for selecting cooking technology. The most suitable clean cooking technology is an induction stove followed by a hot plate, while the least preferred technology is a Bayupankhi stove followed by two-pothole mud improved cooking stoves. To ensure the robustness of the method, sensitivity analysis was performed on the two primary criteria efficiency and capital cost of the cooking technology. The analysis revealed robust and consistent rankings of technologies. This study should help create a conducive environment for relevant stakeholders and policymakers to formulate and implement relevant policies and strategies to accelerate the cooking energy transition in Nepal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clean Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clean Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固体生物质是主要的烹饪能源,尤其是在尼泊尔的农村家庭。使用固体生物质对健康有害,加重了收集生物质的负担,阻碍了清洁能源的获取。了解影响现代烹饪燃料选择的因素,对于提高能源安全和复原力以及促进向清洁燃料过渡至关重要。本研究从政府、非政府组织和学术界专家的角度出发,评估了炊事能源转型的技术选择。我们编制了一份结构化问卷调查,其中包含五项标准和九种烹饪技术选择。51 位专家对调查做出了答复,并使用层次分析法对他们的答复进行了分析。研究表明,效率和资本成本是选择烹饪技术的首要标准。最合适的清洁烹饪技术是电磁炉,其次是热板,而最不受欢迎的技术是巴尤潘基炉灶,其次是双锅底泥改良炉灶。为确保该方法的稳健性,对烹饪技术的效率和资本成本这两个主要标准进行了敏感性分析。分析结果显示,各种技术的排名稳健且一致。这项研究应有助于为相关利益方和决策者创造有利环境,以制定和实施相关政策和战略,加快尼泊尔的炊事能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert perspective on technological choice for cooking energy transition in Nepal
Solid biomass dominates as the primary source of cooking energy, especially in rural households of Nepal. The use of solid biomass has a detrimental effect on health, exacerbates the burden of biomass collection, and hampers access to clean energy. Understanding the factors influencing the choice of modern cooking fuels is crucial to improving energy security and resilience and easing the transition to clean fuels. This study evaluates technological choices for the transition in cooking energy from the perspective of experts working in the government, non-government, and academia sectors. A structured questionnaire survey was prepared with five criteria and nine cooking technology options. Fifty-one experts responded to the survey, and their responses were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process. The study reveals that efficiency and capital cost are the primary criteria for selecting cooking technology. The most suitable clean cooking technology is an induction stove followed by a hot plate, while the least preferred technology is a Bayupankhi stove followed by two-pothole mud improved cooking stoves. To ensure the robustness of the method, sensitivity analysis was performed on the two primary criteria efficiency and capital cost of the cooking technology. The analysis revealed robust and consistent rankings of technologies. This study should help create a conducive environment for relevant stakeholders and policymakers to formulate and implement relevant policies and strategies to accelerate the cooking energy transition in Nepal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clean Energy
Clean Energy Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Scenario of solar energy and policies in India Enhancing Fault Clearing Algorithm for Renewable Energy-based Distribution Systems Using Artificial Neural Networks A numerical investigation on the effect of altering compression ratio, injection timing, and injection duration on the performance of a diesel engine fuelled with diesel-biodiesel-butanol blend Improved Sliding Mode Control for Tracking Global Maximum Power of Triple Series Parallel Ladder Photovoltaic Array under Uneven Shadowing Expert perspective on technological choice for cooking energy transition in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1