相场问题机器学习策略基准测试

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1088/1361-651x/ad5f4a
R. Dingreville, Andreas E Robertson, Vahid Attari, Michael Greenwood, N. Ofori-Opoku, Mythreyi Ramesh, Peter W. Voorhees, Qian Zhang
{"title":"相场问题机器学习策略基准测试","authors":"R. Dingreville, Andreas E Robertson, Vahid Attari, Michael Greenwood, N. Ofori-Opoku, Mythreyi Ramesh, Peter W. Voorhees, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1088/1361-651x/ad5f4a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework for evaluating machine-learning approaches applied to phase-field problems. This framework focuses on four key analysis areas crucial for assessing the performance of such approaches in a systematic and structured way. Firstly, interpolation tasks are examined to identify trends in prediction accuracy and accumulation of error over simulation time. Secondly, extrapolation tasks are also evaluated according to the same metrics. Thirdly, the relationship between model performance and data requirements is investigated to understand the impact on predictions and robustness of these approaches. Finally, systematic errors are analyzed to identify specific events or inadvertent rare events triggering high errors. Quantitative metrics evaluating the local and global description of the microstructure evolution, along with other scalar metrics representative of phase-field problems, are used across these four analysis areas. This benchmarking framework provides a path to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of machine-learning strategies applied to phase-field problems, ultimately facilitating their practical application.","PeriodicalId":18648,"journal":{"name":"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking machine learning strategies for phase-field problems\",\"authors\":\"R. Dingreville, Andreas E Robertson, Vahid Attari, Michael Greenwood, N. Ofori-Opoku, Mythreyi Ramesh, Peter W. Voorhees, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-651x/ad5f4a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework for evaluating machine-learning approaches applied to phase-field problems. This framework focuses on four key analysis areas crucial for assessing the performance of such approaches in a systematic and structured way. Firstly, interpolation tasks are examined to identify trends in prediction accuracy and accumulation of error over simulation time. Secondly, extrapolation tasks are also evaluated according to the same metrics. Thirdly, the relationship between model performance and data requirements is investigated to understand the impact on predictions and robustness of these approaches. Finally, systematic errors are analyzed to identify specific events or inadvertent rare events triggering high errors. Quantitative metrics evaluating the local and global description of the microstructure evolution, along with other scalar metrics representative of phase-field problems, are used across these four analysis areas. This benchmarking framework provides a path to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of machine-learning strategies applied to phase-field problems, ultimately facilitating their practical application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad5f4a\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad5f4a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一个综合基准框架,用于评估应用于相场问题的机器学习方法。该框架重点关注四个关键分析领域,这对于以系统化和结构化的方式评估此类方法的性能至关重要。首先,对内插法任务进行检查,以确定预测精度和误差随模拟时间累积的趋势。其次,还根据相同的指标对外推法任务进行评估。第三,研究模型性能与数据要求之间的关系,以了解这些方法对预测和稳健性的影响。最后,对系统误差进行分析,以确定引发高误差的特定事件或不经意的罕见事件。评估微结构演变的局部和全局描述的定量指标,以及其他代表相场问题的标量指标,被用于这四个分析领域。这一基准框架为评估机器学习策略应用于相场问题的有效性和局限性提供了途径,最终促进了机器学习策略的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking machine learning strategies for phase-field problems
We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework for evaluating machine-learning approaches applied to phase-field problems. This framework focuses on four key analysis areas crucial for assessing the performance of such approaches in a systematic and structured way. Firstly, interpolation tasks are examined to identify trends in prediction accuracy and accumulation of error over simulation time. Secondly, extrapolation tasks are also evaluated according to the same metrics. Thirdly, the relationship between model performance and data requirements is investigated to understand the impact on predictions and robustness of these approaches. Finally, systematic errors are analyzed to identify specific events or inadvertent rare events triggering high errors. Quantitative metrics evaluating the local and global description of the microstructure evolution, along with other scalar metrics representative of phase-field problems, are used across these four analysis areas. This benchmarking framework provides a path to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of machine-learning strategies applied to phase-field problems, ultimately facilitating their practical application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Serving the multidisciplinary materials community, the journal aims to publish new research work that advances the understanding and prediction of material behaviour at scales from atomistic to macroscopic through modelling and simulation. Subject coverage: Modelling and/or simulation across materials science that emphasizes fundamental materials issues advancing the understanding and prediction of material behaviour. Interdisciplinary research that tackles challenging and complex materials problems where the governing phenomena may span different scales of materials behaviour, with an emphasis on the development of quantitative approaches to explain and predict experimental observations. Material processing that advances the fundamental materials science and engineering underpinning the connection between processing and properties. Covering all classes of materials, and mechanical, microstructural, electronic, chemical, biological, and optical properties.
期刊最新文献
Plastic deformation mechanism of γ phase Fe–Cr alloy revealed by molecular dynamics simulations A nonlinear phase-field model of corrosion with charging kinetics of electric double layer Effect of helium bubbles on the mobility of edge dislocations in copper Mechanical-electric-magnetic-thermal coupled enriched finite element method for magneto-electro-elastic structures Molecular dynamics simulations of high-energy radiation damage in hcp-titanium considering electronic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1