评估利培酮和帕潘立酮治疗药物监测对精神分裂症患者的临床疗效:临床数据仓库的启示

Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.3390/ph17070882
Wonsuk Shin, Dong Hyeon Lee, H. Yoo, Huiyoung Jung, M. Bang, Anhye Kim
{"title":"评估利培酮和帕潘立酮治疗药物监测对精神分裂症患者的临床疗效:临床数据仓库的启示","authors":"Wonsuk Shin, Dong Hyeon Lee, H. Yoo, Huiyoung Jung, M. Bang, Anhye Kim","doi":"10.3390/ph17070882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the usage patterns and impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for risperidone and paliperidone in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, utilizing retrospective real-world data sourced from a single center’s Clinical Data Warehouse. Our study cohort comprised patients diagnosed with schizophrenia undergoing treatment with either risperidone or paliperidone. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication utilization, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing TDM and those not undergoing TDM. Additionally, within the TDM group, patients were further stratified based on their risperidone and paliperidone concentrations relative to the reference range. The findings revealed that patients in the TDM group received higher risperidone and paliperidone doses (320 mg/day and 252 mg/day, p = 0.0045) compared to their non-TDM counterparts. Nevertheless, no significant disparities were observed in hospitalization rates, duration of hospital stays, or compliance between the two groups (p = 0.9082, 0.5861, 0.7516, respectively). Subgroup analysis within the TDM cohort exhibited no notable distinctions in clinical outcomes between patients with concentrations within or surpassing the reference range. Despite the possibility of a selection bias in assigning patients to the groups, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of TDM utilization and its ramifications on schizophrenia treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":509865,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Risperidone and Paliperidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: Insights from a Clinical Data Warehouse\",\"authors\":\"Wonsuk Shin, Dong Hyeon Lee, H. Yoo, Huiyoung Jung, M. Bang, Anhye Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph17070882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the usage patterns and impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for risperidone and paliperidone in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, utilizing retrospective real-world data sourced from a single center’s Clinical Data Warehouse. Our study cohort comprised patients diagnosed with schizophrenia undergoing treatment with either risperidone or paliperidone. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication utilization, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing TDM and those not undergoing TDM. Additionally, within the TDM group, patients were further stratified based on their risperidone and paliperidone concentrations relative to the reference range. The findings revealed that patients in the TDM group received higher risperidone and paliperidone doses (320 mg/day and 252 mg/day, p = 0.0045) compared to their non-TDM counterparts. Nevertheless, no significant disparities were observed in hospitalization rates, duration of hospital stays, or compliance between the two groups (p = 0.9082, 0.5861, 0.7516, respectively). Subgroup analysis within the TDM cohort exhibited no notable distinctions in clinical outcomes between patients with concentrations within or surpassing the reference range. Despite the possibility of a selection bias in assigning patients to the groups, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of TDM utilization and its ramifications on schizophrenia treatment outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了利培酮和帕利哌酮在精神分裂症患者中的使用模式及其对治疗药物监测(TDM)的影响,研究数据来自于一个中心的临床数据仓库。我们的研究队列包括接受利培酮或帕潘立酮治疗的精神分裂症患者。我们收集了有关人口统计学特征、合并症、药物使用和临床结果的数据。患者被分为两组:接受 TDM 治疗的患者和未接受 TDM 治疗的患者。此外,在 TDM 组中,根据利培酮和帕利哌酮浓度相对于参考范围的情况对患者进行了进一步分层。研究结果显示,与未接受TDM治疗的患者相比,接受TDM治疗组患者的利培酮和帕利哌酮剂量更高(分别为320毫克/天和252毫克/天,p = 0.0045)。尽管如此,两组患者在住院率、住院时间或依从性方面并无明显差异(p = 0.9082、0.5861、0.7516)。在 TDM 队列中进行的分组分析显示,血药浓度在参考值范围内或超过参考值范围的患者的临床结果没有明显差异。尽管在将患者分配到各组时可能存在选择偏差,但本研究对 TDM 的使用及其对精神分裂症治疗结果的影响进行了全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Risperidone and Paliperidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: Insights from a Clinical Data Warehouse
This study investigated the usage patterns and impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for risperidone and paliperidone in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, utilizing retrospective real-world data sourced from a single center’s Clinical Data Warehouse. Our study cohort comprised patients diagnosed with schizophrenia undergoing treatment with either risperidone or paliperidone. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication utilization, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing TDM and those not undergoing TDM. Additionally, within the TDM group, patients were further stratified based on their risperidone and paliperidone concentrations relative to the reference range. The findings revealed that patients in the TDM group received higher risperidone and paliperidone doses (320 mg/day and 252 mg/day, p = 0.0045) compared to their non-TDM counterparts. Nevertheless, no significant disparities were observed in hospitalization rates, duration of hospital stays, or compliance between the two groups (p = 0.9082, 0.5861, 0.7516, respectively). Subgroup analysis within the TDM cohort exhibited no notable distinctions in clinical outcomes between patients with concentrations within or surpassing the reference range. Despite the possibility of a selection bias in assigning patients to the groups, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of TDM utilization and its ramifications on schizophrenia treatment outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antioxidative and Antiglycative Stress Activities of Selenoglutathione Diselenide The Pivotal Role of Preclinical Animal Models in Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery and Personalized Cancer Therapy Strategies Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Acute Oral Toxicity of Saline Extract and Protein-Rich Fraction from Moringa oleifera Lam. Leaves Artemisia vulgaris Extract as A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Reversing Diabetic Cardiomyopathy in a Rat Model Guidance on Selecting Optimal Steady-State Tacrolimus Concentrations for Continuous IV Perfusion: Insights from Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1