远程医疗领域远程会诊的法律规定

M. A. Kovalenko
{"title":"远程医疗领域远程会诊的法律规定","authors":"M. A. Kovalenko","doi":"10.17816/dd626878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine technologies in the provision of medical care is becoming a widespread phenomenon. The law is designed to regulate emerging social relations in order to prevent negative manifestations and organize their harmonious development. In the field of medicine, it is important to establish legal norms aimed at protecting and safeguarding the rights and legitimate interests of the patient, since fundamental natural human rights — the right to health care and life — are affected. The provision of a wide margin of discretion to those engaged in medical-legal relations may result in a significant violation of the constitutional right of a citizen to health. One of the principal applications of telemedicine technologies is remote consultation with the patient. \nAIM: The aim of the study was to review the current legal framework regulating remote patient consultations, identify problematic issues, and propose solutions to address these issues. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials of the present study are the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 № 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 2017 № 965n, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated September 14, 2020 N 972n. The research methods are formal-legal, comparative-legal, as well as general scientific methods of cognition. \nRESULTS: The general legal regulation permits remote consultation with the patient in the absence of a face-to-face preliminary visit to the attending physician (Art. 36.2 of the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”). Nevertheless, the physician is constrained in his authority to prescribe treatment, modify previously prescribed therapy, or issue an electronic prescription. The result of such a consultation is a medical report. Should the physician determine that a face-to-face appointment is necessary, the patient may be advised to undergo preliminary examinations (clauses 47 and 48 of the Procedure for the Organization and Provision of Medical Care with the Use of Telemedicine Technologies, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 965n dated November 30, 2017). Consequently, there are issues pertaining to the determination of the potential content of the medical report (clause 9 of the aforementioned Order). This affects the scope of liability, as the consulting physician is liable within the limits of the issued medical opinion. Furthermore, these provisions conflict with the requirements to indicate in the medical report reasonable conclusions about the presence (absence) of diseases, the presence of medical indications or medical contraindications for the use of methods of medical examination and (or) treatment, to determine the effectiveness and validity of therapeutic and diagnostic measures (paragraphs “b” and “c” of the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Reports by Medical Organizations, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 972n dated September 14, 2020). \nCONCLUSIONS: The development of telemedicine necessitates the implementation of appropriate regulatory frameworks, as well as the resolution of existing gaps and conflicts. These include the absence of specific requirements pertaining to the content of a medical report issued within the context of remote consultation, as well as the definition of its legal significance. Concurrently, the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Opinions by Medical Organizations stipulates that a medical opinion may be provided upon the patient’s request. In contrast, the Procedure for Organizing and Providing Medical Care Using Telemedicine Technologies specifies that it is issued following a remote consultation. Furthermore, the correlation between a medical report and a consultation sheet remains undefined.","PeriodicalId":34831,"journal":{"name":"Digital Diagnostics","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal regulation of remote consultation in the field of telemedicine\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Kovalenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/dd626878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine technologies in the provision of medical care is becoming a widespread phenomenon. The law is designed to regulate emerging social relations in order to prevent negative manifestations and organize their harmonious development. In the field of medicine, it is important to establish legal norms aimed at protecting and safeguarding the rights and legitimate interests of the patient, since fundamental natural human rights — the right to health care and life — are affected. The provision of a wide margin of discretion to those engaged in medical-legal relations may result in a significant violation of the constitutional right of a citizen to health. One of the principal applications of telemedicine technologies is remote consultation with the patient. \\nAIM: The aim of the study was to review the current legal framework regulating remote patient consultations, identify problematic issues, and propose solutions to address these issues. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials of the present study are the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 № 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 2017 № 965n, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated September 14, 2020 N 972n. The research methods are formal-legal, comparative-legal, as well as general scientific methods of cognition. \\nRESULTS: The general legal regulation permits remote consultation with the patient in the absence of a face-to-face preliminary visit to the attending physician (Art. 36.2 of the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”). Nevertheless, the physician is constrained in his authority to prescribe treatment, modify previously prescribed therapy, or issue an electronic prescription. The result of such a consultation is a medical report. Should the physician determine that a face-to-face appointment is necessary, the patient may be advised to undergo preliminary examinations (clauses 47 and 48 of the Procedure for the Organization and Provision of Medical Care with the Use of Telemedicine Technologies, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 965n dated November 30, 2017). Consequently, there are issues pertaining to the determination of the potential content of the medical report (clause 9 of the aforementioned Order). This affects the scope of liability, as the consulting physician is liable within the limits of the issued medical opinion. Furthermore, these provisions conflict with the requirements to indicate in the medical report reasonable conclusions about the presence (absence) of diseases, the presence of medical indications or medical contraindications for the use of methods of medical examination and (or) treatment, to determine the effectiveness and validity of therapeutic and diagnostic measures (paragraphs “b” and “c” of the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Reports by Medical Organizations, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 972n dated September 14, 2020). \\nCONCLUSIONS: The development of telemedicine necessitates the implementation of appropriate regulatory frameworks, as well as the resolution of existing gaps and conflicts. These include the absence of specific requirements pertaining to the content of a medical report issued within the context of remote consultation, as well as the definition of its legal significance. Concurrently, the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Opinions by Medical Organizations stipulates that a medical opinion may be provided upon the patient’s request. In contrast, the Procedure for Organizing and Providing Medical Care Using Telemedicine Technologies specifies that it is issued following a remote consultation. Furthermore, the correlation between a medical report and a consultation sheet remains undefined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"79 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd626878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd626878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用远程医疗技术提供医疗服务正成为一种普遍现象。法律旨在规范新出现的社会关系,以防止负面表现并组织其和谐发展。在医疗领域,必须制定旨在保护和保障患者权利和合法利益的法律规范,因为基本的自然人权--医疗保健权和生命权--会受到影响。为从事医疗法律关系的人员提供广泛的自由裁量权可能会严重侵犯公民的宪法健康权。远程医疗技术的主要应用之一是与病人进行远程会诊。研究目的:本研究的目的是审查规范患者远程会诊的现行法律框架,找出存在的问题,并提出解决这些问题的方案。材料与方法:本研究的材料是2011年11月21日№323-FZ《俄罗斯联邦公民健康保护基本原则》联邦法、2017年11月30日№965n俄罗斯联邦卫生部令、2020年9月14日N972n俄罗斯联邦卫生部令。研究方法包括形式-法律、比较-法律以及一般科学认知方法。结果:一般法律规定允许在主治医生未进行面对面初步诊疗的情况下与患者进行远程会诊(2011 年 11 月 21 日第 323-FZ 号《俄罗斯联邦公民健康保护基本原则》联邦法第 36.2 条)。然而,医生在开具治疗处方、修改先前开具的治疗处方或开具电子处方的权力方面受到限制。这种咨询的结果是一份医疗报告。如果医生认为有必要进行面对面的预约,可建议患者进行初步检查(2017 年 11 月 30 日俄罗斯联邦卫生部第 965n 号命令批准的《利用远程医疗技术组织和提供医疗服务的程序》第 47 和 48 条)。因此,在确定医疗报告的潜在内容方面存在问题(上述命令第 9 条)。这影响了责任范围,因为会诊医生应在出具的医学意见范围内承担责任。此外,这些规定还与以下要求相冲突,即在医疗报告中说明有关疾病存在(不存在)、医疗检查和 (或)治疗方法的医学适应症或医学禁忌症的合理结论,以确定治疗和诊断措施的有效性和有效性(2020 年 9 月 14 日俄罗斯联邦卫生部第 972n 号命令批准的《医疗机构出具证明和医疗报告程序》"b "和 "c "段)。结论:远程医疗的发展需要实施适当的监管框架,并解决现有的差距和冲突。其中包括对远程会诊中出具的医疗报告的内容及其法律意义的界定缺乏具体要求。同时,《医疗机构出具证明和医学意见程序》规定,可根据患者的要求提供医学意见。而《利用远程医疗技术组织和提供医疗服务的程序》则规定,医疗意见书应在远程会诊后出具。此外,医疗报告和会诊单之间的相互关系仍未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal regulation of remote consultation in the field of telemedicine
BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine technologies in the provision of medical care is becoming a widespread phenomenon. The law is designed to regulate emerging social relations in order to prevent negative manifestations and organize their harmonious development. In the field of medicine, it is important to establish legal norms aimed at protecting and safeguarding the rights and legitimate interests of the patient, since fundamental natural human rights — the right to health care and life — are affected. The provision of a wide margin of discretion to those engaged in medical-legal relations may result in a significant violation of the constitutional right of a citizen to health. One of the principal applications of telemedicine technologies is remote consultation with the patient. AIM: The aim of the study was to review the current legal framework regulating remote patient consultations, identify problematic issues, and propose solutions to address these issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials of the present study are the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 № 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 2017 № 965n, Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated September 14, 2020 N 972n. The research methods are formal-legal, comparative-legal, as well as general scientific methods of cognition. RESULTS: The general legal regulation permits remote consultation with the patient in the absence of a face-to-face preliminary visit to the attending physician (Art. 36.2 of the Federal Law dated November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation”). Nevertheless, the physician is constrained in his authority to prescribe treatment, modify previously prescribed therapy, or issue an electronic prescription. The result of such a consultation is a medical report. Should the physician determine that a face-to-face appointment is necessary, the patient may be advised to undergo preliminary examinations (clauses 47 and 48 of the Procedure for the Organization and Provision of Medical Care with the Use of Telemedicine Technologies, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 965n dated November 30, 2017). Consequently, there are issues pertaining to the determination of the potential content of the medical report (clause 9 of the aforementioned Order). This affects the scope of liability, as the consulting physician is liable within the limits of the issued medical opinion. Furthermore, these provisions conflict with the requirements to indicate in the medical report reasonable conclusions about the presence (absence) of diseases, the presence of medical indications or medical contraindications for the use of methods of medical examination and (or) treatment, to determine the effectiveness and validity of therapeutic and diagnostic measures (paragraphs “b” and “c” of the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Reports by Medical Organizations, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 972n dated September 14, 2020). CONCLUSIONS: The development of telemedicine necessitates the implementation of appropriate regulatory frameworks, as well as the resolution of existing gaps and conflicts. These include the absence of specific requirements pertaining to the content of a medical report issued within the context of remote consultation, as well as the definition of its legal significance. Concurrently, the Procedure for Issuing Certificates and Medical Opinions by Medical Organizations stipulates that a medical opinion may be provided upon the patient’s request. In contrast, the Procedure for Organizing and Providing Medical Care Using Telemedicine Technologies specifies that it is issued following a remote consultation. Furthermore, the correlation between a medical report and a consultation sheet remains undefined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new AI program for the automatic evaluation of scoliosis on frontal spinal radiographs: Accuracy, pros and cons. Conventional and innovative imaging modalities in Bladder Cancer: techniques and applications Possibilities and limitations of MRI diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinomas of the cervix. An unknown situs viscerum inversus totalis, accidentally discovered after a CT scan The Role of Teleradiology in Interpretation of Ultrasounds Performed in the Emergency Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1