利用安全用药实践研究所的有效性层次分析学术医疗中心应对致命用药错误的纠正行动计划

Aubrey R Stolte, Yasmin M Siwy, Sarah B Tanios, Daniel D Degnan
{"title":"利用安全用药实践研究所的有效性层次分析学术医疗中心应对致命用药错误的纠正行动计划","authors":"Aubrey R Stolte, Yasmin M Siwy, Sarah B Tanios, Daniel D Degnan","doi":"10.33940/001c.117504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are high-alert medications that require special handling, necessitating a robust process that prevents medication error, identifies near misses, and ultimately protects patients from harm. One patient at a large academic medical center (AMC) was given vecuronium, a neuromuscular blocking agent, instead of midazolam, and died as a result. Thus, AMC was tasked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to make a list of actions to prevent a subsequent incident. When assessing AMC’s corrective action plan in comparison to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ hierarchy of effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies, it was revealed that 76% of strategies were of low leverage, 16% were of medium leverage, and 8% were of high leverage. In this context, AMC’s corrective action plan should have integrated more system-based interventions, which include medium- or high-leverage strategies, rather than relying heavily on initiatives dependent on human action. Despite the lack of these systemic tools, CMS granted approval for the plan. Overlooking these systemic tools may amplify patient harm and negatively impact workforce satisfaction and efficiency. Moreover, the absence of a “just culture” also plays a role in patient harm. Therefore, recognizing that medication errors in healthcare are predominantly attributed to human error highlights the importance of fostering a just culture that advocates for system accountability to enhance patient safety.","PeriodicalId":509285,"journal":{"name":"PATIENT SAFETY","volume":"30 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of an Academic Medical Center’s Corrective Action Plan in Response to Fatal Medication Error Using the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ Hierarchy of Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Aubrey R Stolte, Yasmin M Siwy, Sarah B Tanios, Daniel D Degnan\",\"doi\":\"10.33940/001c.117504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are high-alert medications that require special handling, necessitating a robust process that prevents medication error, identifies near misses, and ultimately protects patients from harm. One patient at a large academic medical center (AMC) was given vecuronium, a neuromuscular blocking agent, instead of midazolam, and died as a result. Thus, AMC was tasked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to make a list of actions to prevent a subsequent incident. When assessing AMC’s corrective action plan in comparison to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ hierarchy of effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies, it was revealed that 76% of strategies were of low leverage, 16% were of medium leverage, and 8% were of high leverage. In this context, AMC’s corrective action plan should have integrated more system-based interventions, which include medium- or high-leverage strategies, rather than relying heavily on initiatives dependent on human action. Despite the lack of these systemic tools, CMS granted approval for the plan. Overlooking these systemic tools may amplify patient harm and negatively impact workforce satisfaction and efficiency. Moreover, the absence of a “just culture” also plays a role in patient harm. Therefore, recognizing that medication errors in healthcare are predominantly attributed to human error highlights the importance of fostering a just culture that advocates for system accountability to enhance patient safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PATIENT SAFETY\",\"volume\":\"30 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PATIENT SAFETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.117504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATIENT SAFETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.117504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经肌肉阻断剂 (NMBA) 是需要特殊处理的高警戒药物,因此必须有一套健全的流程来防止用药错误、识别险情并最终保护患者免受伤害。一家大型学术医疗中心 (AMC) 曾给一名患者注射了神经肌肉阻断剂维库伦(vecuronium),而不是咪达唑仑(midazolam),结果导致患者死亡。因此,医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)责成 AMC 制定一份行动清单,以防止类似事件再次发生。在评估 AMC 的纠正行动计划时,将其与安全用药实践研究所(Institute for Safe Medication Practices)的风险降低策略有效性等级进行了比较,结果显示 76% 的策略属于低效策略,16% 属于中效策略,8% 属于高效策略。在这种情况下,AMC 的纠正行动计划本应纳入更多基于系统的干预措施,其中包括中等或高杠杆战略,而不是严重依赖于依靠人的行动的举措。尽管缺乏这些系统性工具,CMS 还是批准了该计划。忽视这些系统性工具可能会扩大对患者的伤害,并对员工满意度和效率产生负面影响。此外,缺乏 "公正文化 "也会对患者造成伤害。因此,认识到医疗保健中的用药错误主要归咎于人为错误,就凸显了培养公正文化的重要性,这种文化倡导系统问责制,以加强患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of an Academic Medical Center’s Corrective Action Plan in Response to Fatal Medication Error Using the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ Hierarchy of Effectiveness
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are high-alert medications that require special handling, necessitating a robust process that prevents medication error, identifies near misses, and ultimately protects patients from harm. One patient at a large academic medical center (AMC) was given vecuronium, a neuromuscular blocking agent, instead of midazolam, and died as a result. Thus, AMC was tasked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to make a list of actions to prevent a subsequent incident. When assessing AMC’s corrective action plan in comparison to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ hierarchy of effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies, it was revealed that 76% of strategies were of low leverage, 16% were of medium leverage, and 8% were of high leverage. In this context, AMC’s corrective action plan should have integrated more system-based interventions, which include medium- or high-leverage strategies, rather than relying heavily on initiatives dependent on human action. Despite the lack of these systemic tools, CMS granted approval for the plan. Overlooking these systemic tools may amplify patient harm and negatively impact workforce satisfaction and efficiency. Moreover, the absence of a “just culture” also plays a role in patient harm. Therefore, recognizing that medication errors in healthcare are predominantly attributed to human error highlights the importance of fostering a just culture that advocates for system accountability to enhance patient safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Compliance Monitoring Process to Promote Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing and Hand Hygiene: An Initiative to Decrease Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections Unmasking the Contributing Factors to Oxygen Disruption Events in the Inpatient Environment and Emergency Department Free Text as Part of Electronic Health Record Orders: Context or Concern? Technology Failures Analysis of an Academic Medical Center’s Corrective Action Plan in Response to Fatal Medication Error Using the Institute for Safe Medication Practices’ Hierarchy of Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1