低层和高层建筑的抗震分析及其地基设计

Dilkhush Meena, Abhishek Bansal, M. Bharathi
{"title":"低层和高层建筑的抗震分析及其地基设计","authors":"Dilkhush Meena,&nbsp;Abhishek Bansal,&nbsp;M. Bharathi","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The design of foundations for tall structures is an interesting and challenging task. In structural design usually, the effect of foundation soil is generally overlooked. In this study, 3D analysis of the superstructure is carried out considering the self-weight, imposed load and earthquake load. The provisions of (BIS Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016a) are used to carry out the dynamic analyses. Three-dimensional analysis of the building system is used to design and analyse the superstructure in which the structural performance parameters viz., base shear, lateral load distribution, natural time period, storey drift ratio, beam-column capacity (BCC) and percentage reinforcement were evaluated for low-rise building (G + 4) and high-rise building (G + 15) located in seismic zone- II &amp; III. The support reactions of the superstructure were exported and used to design the foundation. SAFE software was used to design the raft foundation for low-rise buildings (G + 4) whereas the piled raft was designed for high-rise buildings (G + 15). The parametric study was carried out considering different values of soil bearing capacity as 165, 200 and 250 kN/m<sup>2</sup> and the thickness of the raft was varied from 0.3 to 1 m in the case of low-rise building. For high-rise buildings, the diameter of the pile was kept constant and the length of the pile was varied to arrive at a suitable dimension. Parameters like settlement, soil pressure and punching shear failure were compared and discussed. It was found that the column size of G + 15 building was increased when compared to G + 4 building. The time period and base shear of the building evaluated by the equivalent static method and response spectrum method were found to be in good agreement. The storey drift ratio and beam-column capacity were found to be within the prescribed limits in relevant IS codes. For G + 4 building, located in SZ II and III a minimum raft thickness of 1000 mm is recommended for soil with a bearing capacity of 165 kN/m<sup>2</sup> while for soil with a bearing capacity of 200 and 250 kN/m<sup>2</sup> the minimum thickness of the raft is 500 mm. For G + 15 building, located in SZ II and III even a raft with a thickness of 2.0 m was not found sufficient and hence piled raft was used with a raft thickness of 1.75 m and a pile length of 10 m for all bearing capacity of soil considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5215 - 5226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic analysis of low rise and high rise building and its foundation design\",\"authors\":\"Dilkhush Meena,&nbsp;Abhishek Bansal,&nbsp;M. Bharathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The design of foundations for tall structures is an interesting and challenging task. In structural design usually, the effect of foundation soil is generally overlooked. In this study, 3D analysis of the superstructure is carried out considering the self-weight, imposed load and earthquake load. The provisions of (BIS Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016a) are used to carry out the dynamic analyses. Three-dimensional analysis of the building system is used to design and analyse the superstructure in which the structural performance parameters viz., base shear, lateral load distribution, natural time period, storey drift ratio, beam-column capacity (BCC) and percentage reinforcement were evaluated for low-rise building (G + 4) and high-rise building (G + 15) located in seismic zone- II &amp; III. The support reactions of the superstructure were exported and used to design the foundation. SAFE software was used to design the raft foundation for low-rise buildings (G + 4) whereas the piled raft was designed for high-rise buildings (G + 15). The parametric study was carried out considering different values of soil bearing capacity as 165, 200 and 250 kN/m<sup>2</sup> and the thickness of the raft was varied from 0.3 to 1 m in the case of low-rise building. For high-rise buildings, the diameter of the pile was kept constant and the length of the pile was varied to arrive at a suitable dimension. Parameters like settlement, soil pressure and punching shear failure were compared and discussed. It was found that the column size of G + 15 building was increased when compared to G + 4 building. The time period and base shear of the building evaluated by the equivalent static method and response spectrum method were found to be in good agreement. The storey drift ratio and beam-column capacity were found to be within the prescribed limits in relevant IS codes. For G + 4 building, located in SZ II and III a minimum raft thickness of 1000 mm is recommended for soil with a bearing capacity of 165 kN/m<sup>2</sup> while for soil with a bearing capacity of 200 and 250 kN/m<sup>2</sup> the minimum thickness of the raft is 500 mm. For G + 15 building, located in SZ II and III even a raft with a thickness of 2.0 m was not found sufficient and hence piled raft was used with a raft thickness of 1.75 m and a pile length of 10 m for all bearing capacity of soil considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"5215 - 5226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高层建筑的地基设计是一项既有趣又具有挑战性的任务。在结构设计中,地基土的影响通常被忽视。本研究对上部结构进行了三维分析,考虑了自重、外加荷载和地震荷载。结构抗震设计标准规范》(BIS Code of Practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures:第 1 部分,一般规定和建筑物,IS 1893,印度标准局,新德里,2016a)的规定进行动态分析。建筑系统的三维分析用于设计和分析上部结构,其中对位于地震带 II & III 的低层建筑(G + 4)和高层建筑(G + 15)的结构性能参数,即基底剪力、侧向荷载分布、自然时间周期、层漂移比、梁柱承载力(BCC)和配筋百分比进行了评估。上层建筑的支撑反力被导出并用于地基设计。低层建筑(G+4)采用 SAFE 软件设计筏式地基,高层建筑(G+15)采用桩式筏式地基。在进行参数研究时,考虑了不同的土壤承载力值(165、200 和 250 kN/m2),在低层建筑中,筏基的厚度从 0.3 米到 1 米不等。对于高层建筑,桩的直径保持不变,桩的长度变化以达到合适的尺寸。对沉降、土压力和冲剪破坏等参数进行了比较和讨论。结果发现,与 G+4 建筑相比,G+15 建筑的支柱尺寸有所增加。通过等效静力法和反应谱法对建筑物的时间周期和基底剪力进行评估,发现两者非常一致。层漂移率和梁柱承载力均在相关 IS 规范规定的范围内。对于位于 SZ II 和 III 区的 G + 4 建筑,建议在承载力为 165 kN/m2 的土壤中使用最小厚度为 1000 毫米的筏板,而在承载力为 200 和 250 kN/m2 的土壤中使用最小厚度为 500 毫米的筏板。对于位于 SZ II 和 III 区的 G + 15 建筑,即使厚度为 2.0 米的筏板也是不够的,因此在考虑到所有土壤承载力的情况下,采用了桩式筏板,筏板厚度为 1.75 米,桩长为 10 米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seismic analysis of low rise and high rise building and its foundation design

The design of foundations for tall structures is an interesting and challenging task. In structural design usually, the effect of foundation soil is generally overlooked. In this study, 3D analysis of the superstructure is carried out considering the self-weight, imposed load and earthquake load. The provisions of (BIS Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016a) are used to carry out the dynamic analyses. Three-dimensional analysis of the building system is used to design and analyse the superstructure in which the structural performance parameters viz., base shear, lateral load distribution, natural time period, storey drift ratio, beam-column capacity (BCC) and percentage reinforcement were evaluated for low-rise building (G + 4) and high-rise building (G + 15) located in seismic zone- II & III. The support reactions of the superstructure were exported and used to design the foundation. SAFE software was used to design the raft foundation for low-rise buildings (G + 4) whereas the piled raft was designed for high-rise buildings (G + 15). The parametric study was carried out considering different values of soil bearing capacity as 165, 200 and 250 kN/m2 and the thickness of the raft was varied from 0.3 to 1 m in the case of low-rise building. For high-rise buildings, the diameter of the pile was kept constant and the length of the pile was varied to arrive at a suitable dimension. Parameters like settlement, soil pressure and punching shear failure were compared and discussed. It was found that the column size of G + 15 building was increased when compared to G + 4 building. The time period and base shear of the building evaluated by the equivalent static method and response spectrum method were found to be in good agreement. The storey drift ratio and beam-column capacity were found to be within the prescribed limits in relevant IS codes. For G + 4 building, located in SZ II and III a minimum raft thickness of 1000 mm is recommended for soil with a bearing capacity of 165 kN/m2 while for soil with a bearing capacity of 200 and 250 kN/m2 the minimum thickness of the raft is 500 mm. For G + 15 building, located in SZ II and III even a raft with a thickness of 2.0 m was not found sufficient and hence piled raft was used with a raft thickness of 1.75 m and a pile length of 10 m for all bearing capacity of soil considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning approaches to soil-structure interaction under seismic loading: predictive modeling and analysis Studies on soil stabilized hollow blocks using c & d waste Optimizing ventilation system retrofitting: balancing time, cost, and indoor air quality with NSGA-III Sustainability assessment of sheet pile materials: concrete vs steel in retaining wall construction Predictive modeling for concrete properties under variable curing conditions using advanced machine learning approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1