解读健康记录滥用的复杂性:来自澳大利亚医疗服务机构的启示

Javad K. Pool, Saeed Akhlaghpour, Andrew Burton-Jones
{"title":"解读健康记录滥用的复杂性:来自澳大利亚医疗服务机构的启示","authors":"Javad K. Pool, Saeed Akhlaghpour, Andrew Burton-Jones","doi":"10.1108/itp-12-2022-0931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeInformation systems (IS) research in general and health IS studies, in particular, are prone to a positivity bias – largely focusing on upside gains rather than the potential misuse practices. This paper aims to explore failures in health IS use and shortcomings in data privacy and cybersecurity and to provide an explanatory model for health record misuse.Design/methodology/approachThis research is based on four data sets that we collected through a longitudinal project studying digital health (implementation, use and evaluation), interviews with experts (cybersecurity and digital health) and healthcare stakeholders (health professionals and managers). We applied qualitative analysis to explain health records misuse from a sociotechnical perspective.FindingsWe propose a contextualized model of “health records misuse” with two overarching dimensions: data misfit and improper data processing. We explain sub-categories of data misfit: availability misfit, meaning misfit and place misfit, as well as sub-categories of improper data processing: improper interaction and improper use-related actions. Our findings demonstrate how health records misuse can emerge in sociotechnical health systems and impact health service delivery and patient safety.Originality/valueThrough contextualizing system misuse in healthcare, this research advances the understanding of ineffective use and failures in health data protection practices. Our proposed theoretical model provides explanations for unique patterns of IS misuse in healthcare, where data protection failures are consequential for healthcare organizations and patient safety.","PeriodicalId":504906,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the complexities of health record misuse: insights from Australian health services\",\"authors\":\"Javad K. Pool, Saeed Akhlaghpour, Andrew Burton-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/itp-12-2022-0931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeInformation systems (IS) research in general and health IS studies, in particular, are prone to a positivity bias – largely focusing on upside gains rather than the potential misuse practices. This paper aims to explore failures in health IS use and shortcomings in data privacy and cybersecurity and to provide an explanatory model for health record misuse.Design/methodology/approachThis research is based on four data sets that we collected through a longitudinal project studying digital health (implementation, use and evaluation), interviews with experts (cybersecurity and digital health) and healthcare stakeholders (health professionals and managers). We applied qualitative analysis to explain health records misuse from a sociotechnical perspective.FindingsWe propose a contextualized model of “health records misuse” with two overarching dimensions: data misfit and improper data processing. We explain sub-categories of data misfit: availability misfit, meaning misfit and place misfit, as well as sub-categories of improper data processing: improper interaction and improper use-related actions. Our findings demonstrate how health records misuse can emerge in sociotechnical health systems and impact health service delivery and patient safety.Originality/valueThrough contextualizing system misuse in healthcare, this research advances the understanding of ineffective use and failures in health data protection practices. Our proposed theoretical model provides explanations for unique patterns of IS misuse in healthcare, where data protection failures are consequential for healthcare organizations and patient safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Technology & People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Technology & People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-12-2022-0931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-12-2022-0931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的一般而言,信息系统(IS)研究,尤其是健康信息系统研究,容易产生积极的偏差--主要集中于正面收益,而不是潜在的滥用行为。本文旨在探讨医疗信息系统使用中的失误以及数据隐私和网络安全方面的缺陷,并为健康记录滥用提供一个解释模型。设计/方法/途径本研究基于四个数据集,这些数据集是我们通过一个研究数字医疗(实施、使用和评估)的纵向项目、对专家(网络安全和数字医疗)和医疗利益相关者(医疗专业人员和管理人员)的访谈收集而来的。我们运用定性分析从社会技术的角度解释了健康记录的滥用。研究结果我们提出了 "健康记录滥用 "的情境化模型,该模型有两个主要维度:数据不匹配和数据处理不当。我们解释了数据错配的子类别:可用性错配、意义错配和地点错配,以及数据处理不当的子类别:不当交互和不当使用相关行为。我们的研究结果表明了健康记录滥用是如何在社会技术医疗系统中出现并影响医疗服务的提供和患者安全的。原创性/价值本研究通过对医疗系统滥用的背景进行分析,加深了人们对无效使用和健康数据保护实践失败的理解。我们提出的理论模型为医疗保健领域独特的信息系统滥用模式提供了解释,其中数据保护失败对医疗保健机构和患者安全造成了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unpacking the complexities of health record misuse: insights from Australian health services
PurposeInformation systems (IS) research in general and health IS studies, in particular, are prone to a positivity bias – largely focusing on upside gains rather than the potential misuse practices. This paper aims to explore failures in health IS use and shortcomings in data privacy and cybersecurity and to provide an explanatory model for health record misuse.Design/methodology/approachThis research is based on four data sets that we collected through a longitudinal project studying digital health (implementation, use and evaluation), interviews with experts (cybersecurity and digital health) and healthcare stakeholders (health professionals and managers). We applied qualitative analysis to explain health records misuse from a sociotechnical perspective.FindingsWe propose a contextualized model of “health records misuse” with two overarching dimensions: data misfit and improper data processing. We explain sub-categories of data misfit: availability misfit, meaning misfit and place misfit, as well as sub-categories of improper data processing: improper interaction and improper use-related actions. Our findings demonstrate how health records misuse can emerge in sociotechnical health systems and impact health service delivery and patient safety.Originality/valueThrough contextualizing system misuse in healthcare, this research advances the understanding of ineffective use and failures in health data protection practices. Our proposed theoretical model provides explanations for unique patterns of IS misuse in healthcare, where data protection failures are consequential for healthcare organizations and patient safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of digital media exposure, information verification and vaccination intention: an empirical study in China Diversity of digital media exposure, information verification and vaccination intention: an empirical study in China Assessing factors influencing intentions to use cryptocurrency payments in the hospitality sector Artificial intelligence and work transformations: integrating sensemaking and workplace learning perspectives Understanding experiences of adverse digital incorporation of ridesharing drivers in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1