文人与非文人:敏感性阅读辩论中的贬损修辞策略

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Information & Culture Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.7560/ic59202
E. E. Lawrence
{"title":"文人与非文人:敏感性阅读辩论中的贬损修辞策略","authors":"E. E. Lawrence","doi":"10.7560/ic59202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Sensitivity reading (SR)—the expert, ameliorative assessment of literary texts for superficial, inaccurate, or degradative depictions of oppressed groups—is a hotly contested service in the book industry, one that some hold is censorious. This article explicates how these detractors’ critiques function as informal suppression, drawing inspiration from Joanna Russ to expose key rhetorical strategies that reinforce a pernicious distinction between “literary” insidersand “nonliterary” out siders. The construction and propagation of this distinction ultimately encodes minoritized editors as “sensitive readers” who constitute a threat to the literary enterprise itself, thereby rationalizing their continued marginalization on aesthetic grounds.","PeriodicalId":42337,"journal":{"name":"Information & Culture","volume":"22 1","pages":"125 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literary versus Nonliterary People: Rhetorical Strategies of Derogation in the Sensitivity Reading Debate\",\"authors\":\"E. E. Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/ic59202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Sensitivity reading (SR)—the expert, ameliorative assessment of literary texts for superficial, inaccurate, or degradative depictions of oppressed groups—is a hotly contested service in the book industry, one that some hold is censorious. This article explicates how these detractors’ critiques function as informal suppression, drawing inspiration from Joanna Russ to expose key rhetorical strategies that reinforce a pernicious distinction between “literary” insidersand “nonliterary” out siders. The construction and propagation of this distinction ultimately encodes minoritized editors as “sensitive readers” who constitute a threat to the literary enterprise itself, thereby rationalizing their continued marginalization on aesthetic grounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Culture\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic59202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic59202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT:Sensitivity reading (SR)--专家对文学文本进行的改善性评估,以发现对受压迫群体的肤浅、不准确或有辱人格的描述--是图书行业中一项备受争议的服务,有些人认为这是一种审查。本文从乔安娜-拉斯(Joanna Russ)那里汲取灵感,揭露了强化 "文学 "圈内人与 "非文学 "圈外人之间有害区别的关键修辞策略,阐述了这些诋毁者的批评如何起到非正式压制的作用。这种区分的构建和传播最终将少数派编辑编码为对文学事业本身构成威胁的 "敏感读者",从而以美学为由将他们的持续边缘化合理化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literary versus Nonliterary People: Rhetorical Strategies of Derogation in the Sensitivity Reading Debate
ABSTRACT:Sensitivity reading (SR)—the expert, ameliorative assessment of literary texts for superficial, inaccurate, or degradative depictions of oppressed groups—is a hotly contested service in the book industry, one that some hold is censorious. This article explicates how these detractors’ critiques function as informal suppression, drawing inspiration from Joanna Russ to expose key rhetorical strategies that reinforce a pernicious distinction between “literary” insidersand “nonliterary” out siders. The construction and propagation of this distinction ultimately encodes minoritized editors as “sensitive readers” who constitute a threat to the literary enterprise itself, thereby rationalizing their continued marginalization on aesthetic grounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Literary versus Nonliterary People: Rhetorical Strategies of Derogation in the Sensitivity Reading Debate Dynamics of Gender Bias within Computer Science How Does Short Video Viewing Influence Young Children’s Everyday Language Practices? A Case Study of China Embodiment, Endorsement, and Policy: Considerations for Intellectual Freedom in the Library Turtles, Tablets, and Boxes: Computer Technology and Education in the 1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1