器官捐赠中的道德不公:基于年龄的拒绝研究

Q4 Medicine Narrative inquiry in bioethics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1353/nib.0.a933010
Tayyah S. Diwan, Lindsay R. Beaman
{"title":"器官捐赠中的道德不公:基于年龄的拒绝研究","authors":"Tayyah S. Diwan, Lindsay R. Beaman","doi":"10.1353/nib.0.a933010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision to donate an organ is often the decision to save a loved one’s life. Frequently recognized as an ultimate act of altruism, a person’s choice to donate is embedded in their right to make decisions about their own body and well-being, free of coercion. To ensure donors are truly acting out of altruism, transplant professionals will not allow someone to donate if there are concerns of duress or inability to consent. Although the evaluation of potential donors is well-intentioned and necessary, stigma and assumptions about young adults can sometimes lead to their being denied the opportunity to donate based on age rather than evidence, thus infringing upon their bodily autonomy. This case examines the narrative of a young man trying to save his sister through kidney donation, and the ramifications of denying him the opportunity to do so, and how the transplant community can re-envision their role in protecting young adult donors.","PeriodicalId":37978,"journal":{"name":"Narrative inquiry in bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Inequity in Organ Donation: An Examination of Age-Based Denial\",\"authors\":\"Tayyah S. Diwan, Lindsay R. Beaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nib.0.a933010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decision to donate an organ is often the decision to save a loved one’s life. Frequently recognized as an ultimate act of altruism, a person’s choice to donate is embedded in their right to make decisions about their own body and well-being, free of coercion. To ensure donors are truly acting out of altruism, transplant professionals will not allow someone to donate if there are concerns of duress or inability to consent. Although the evaluation of potential donors is well-intentioned and necessary, stigma and assumptions about young adults can sometimes lead to their being denied the opportunity to donate based on age rather than evidence, thus infringing upon their bodily autonomy. This case examines the narrative of a young man trying to save his sister through kidney donation, and the ramifications of denying him the opportunity to do so, and how the transplant community can re-envision their role in protecting young adult donors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narrative inquiry in bioethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narrative inquiry in bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.0.a933010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative inquiry in bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.0.a933010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

捐献器官的决定往往是拯救亲人生命的决定。一个人选择捐献器官通常被认为是利他主义的终极行为,它蕴含着一个人在不受胁迫的情况下对自己的身体和福祉做出决定的权利。为确保捐献者真正出于利他主义,如果担心有人受到胁迫或无法表示同意,器官移植专业人士将不允许其进行捐献。尽管对潜在捐献者进行评估的初衷是好的,也是必要的,但对年轻人的成见和假设有时会导致他们因年龄而非证据被剥夺捐献机会,从而侵犯了他们的身体自主权。本案例探讨了一个年轻人试图通过捐肾救妹妹的故事,以及剥夺他捐肾机会的后果,并探讨了移植界如何重新认识他们在保护年轻成人捐献者方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral Inequity in Organ Donation: An Examination of Age-Based Denial
The decision to donate an organ is often the decision to save a loved one’s life. Frequently recognized as an ultimate act of altruism, a person’s choice to donate is embedded in their right to make decisions about their own body and well-being, free of coercion. To ensure donors are truly acting out of altruism, transplant professionals will not allow someone to donate if there are concerns of duress or inability to consent. Although the evaluation of potential donors is well-intentioned and necessary, stigma and assumptions about young adults can sometimes lead to their being denied the opportunity to donate based on age rather than evidence, thus infringing upon their bodily autonomy. This case examines the narrative of a young man trying to save his sister through kidney donation, and the ramifications of denying him the opportunity to do so, and how the transplant community can re-envision their role in protecting young adult donors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Narrative inquiry in bioethics
Narrative inquiry in bioethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics (NIB) is a unique journal that provides a forum for exploring current issues in bioethics through personal stories, qualitative and mixed-methods research articles, and case studies. NIB is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of bioethical issues by publishing rich descriptions of complex human experiences written in the words of the person experiencing them. While NIB upholds appropriate standards for narrative inquiry and qualitative research, it seeks to publish articles that will appeal to a broad readership of healthcare providers and researchers, bioethicists, sociologists, policy makers, and others. Articles may address the experiences of patients, family members, and health care workers.
期刊最新文献
Moral Inequity in Organ Donation: An Examination of Age-Based Denial Ethical Considerations of Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Pediatric Patients Difficult Discharge in the Context of Suspected Malingering: Reflections on the Value of Epistemic and Professional Independence “Do We Have to Tell Him He Hasn’t Been Getting Ativan?”: Truth Telling for a Patient with Nonepileptic Seizures Withdrawing Life Support After Attempted Suicide: A Case Study and Review of Ethical Consideration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1