促进软件生产自动化和创新的 GitHub 市场

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107522
SK. Golam Saroar, Waseefa Ahmed, Elmira Onagh, Maleknaz Nayebi
{"title":"促进软件生产自动化和创新的 GitHub 市场","authors":"SK. Golam Saroar,&nbsp;Waseefa Ahmed,&nbsp;Elmira Onagh,&nbsp;Maleknaz Nayebi","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>GitHub, renowned for facilitating collaborative code version control and software production in software teams, expanded its services in 2017 by introducing GitHub Marketplace. This online platform hosts automation tools to assist developers with the production of their GitHub-hosted projects, and it has become a valuable source of information on the tools used in the Open Source Software (OSS) community.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>In this exploratory study, we introduce GitHub Marketplace as a software marketplace by exploring the Characteristics, Features, and Policies of the platform comprehensively, identifying common themes in production automation. Further, we explore popular tools among practitioners and researchers and highlight disparities in the approach to these tools between industry and academia.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>We adopted the conceptual framework of software app stores from previous studies and used that to examine 8,318 automated production tools (440 Apps and 7,878 Actions) across 32 categories on GitHub Marketplace. We explored and described the policies of this marketplace as a unique platform where developers share production tools for the use of other developers. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic mapping of 515 research papers published from 2000 to 2021 and compared open-source academic production tools with those available in the marketplace.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We found that although some of the automation topics in literature are widely used in practice, they have yet to align with the state-of-practice for automated production. We discovered that practitioners often use automation tools for tasks like “Continuous Integration” and “Utilities”, while researchers tend to focus more on “Code Quality” and “Testing”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Our study illuminates the landscape of open-source tools for automation production. We also explored the disparities between industry trends and researchers’ priorities. Recognizing these distinctions can empower researchers to build on existing work and guide practitioners in selecting tools that meet their specific needs. Bridging this gap between industry and academia helps with further innovation in the field and ensures that research remains pertinent to the evolving challenges in software production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 107522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001277/pdfft?md5=a5f34bd55e7fac78519b3f67fd64a5c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001277-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GitHub marketplace for automation and innovation in software production\",\"authors\":\"SK. Golam Saroar,&nbsp;Waseefa Ahmed,&nbsp;Elmira Onagh,&nbsp;Maleknaz Nayebi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>GitHub, renowned for facilitating collaborative code version control and software production in software teams, expanded its services in 2017 by introducing GitHub Marketplace. This online platform hosts automation tools to assist developers with the production of their GitHub-hosted projects, and it has become a valuable source of information on the tools used in the Open Source Software (OSS) community.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>In this exploratory study, we introduce GitHub Marketplace as a software marketplace by exploring the Characteristics, Features, and Policies of the platform comprehensively, identifying common themes in production automation. Further, we explore popular tools among practitioners and researchers and highlight disparities in the approach to these tools between industry and academia.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>We adopted the conceptual framework of software app stores from previous studies and used that to examine 8,318 automated production tools (440 Apps and 7,878 Actions) across 32 categories on GitHub Marketplace. We explored and described the policies of this marketplace as a unique platform where developers share production tools for the use of other developers. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic mapping of 515 research papers published from 2000 to 2021 and compared open-source academic production tools with those available in the marketplace.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We found that although some of the automation topics in literature are widely used in practice, they have yet to align with the state-of-practice for automated production. We discovered that practitioners often use automation tools for tasks like “Continuous Integration” and “Utilities”, while researchers tend to focus more on “Code Quality” and “Testing”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Our study illuminates the landscape of open-source tools for automation production. We also explored the disparities between industry trends and researchers’ priorities. Recognizing these distinctions can empower researchers to build on existing work and guide practitioners in selecting tools that meet their specific needs. Bridging this gap between industry and academia helps with further innovation in the field and ensures that research remains pertinent to the evolving challenges in software production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001277/pdfft?md5=a5f34bd55e7fac78519b3f67fd64a5c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001277-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:GitHub 以促进软件团队的协作代码版本控制和软件生产而闻名,2017 年推出了 GitHub Marketplace,扩大了服务范围。这个在线平台上的自动化工具可以帮助开发人员生产他们在 GitHub 上托管的项目,它已成为开源软件(OSS)社区使用的工具的宝贵信息来源。目标:在这项探索性研究中,我们通过全面探索该平台的特点、功能和政策来介绍作为软件市场的 GitHub Marketplace,找出生产自动化的共同主题。方法:我们采用了之前研究中的软件应用程序商店概念框架,并以此为基础,对 GitHub Marketplace 上 32 个类别中的 8318 个自动化生产工具(440 个应用程序和 7878 个操作)进行了研究。我们探索并描述了该市场的政策,它是开发者分享生产工具供其他开发者使用的独特平台。此外,我们还对 2000 年至 2021 年期间发表的 515 篇研究论文进行了系统性的映射,并将开源学术生产工具与市场上的生产工具进行了比较。结果:我们发现,尽管文献中的一些自动化主题在实践中得到了广泛应用,但它们尚未与自动化生产的实践状况相一致。我们发现,实践者通常将自动化工具用于 "持续集成 "和 "实用工具 "等任务,而研究人员则更倾向于关注 "代码质量 "和 "测试"。我们还探讨了行业趋势与研究人员优先事项之间的差异。认识到这些差异可以使研究人员在现有工作的基础上更进一步,并指导从业人员选择满足其特定需求的工具。缩小行业与学术界之间的差距有助于该领域的进一步创新,并确保研究工作始终与软件生产领域不断变化的挑战相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GitHub marketplace for automation and innovation in software production

Context:

GitHub, renowned for facilitating collaborative code version control and software production in software teams, expanded its services in 2017 by introducing GitHub Marketplace. This online platform hosts automation tools to assist developers with the production of their GitHub-hosted projects, and it has become a valuable source of information on the tools used in the Open Source Software (OSS) community.

Objective:

In this exploratory study, we introduce GitHub Marketplace as a software marketplace by exploring the Characteristics, Features, and Policies of the platform comprehensively, identifying common themes in production automation. Further, we explore popular tools among practitioners and researchers and highlight disparities in the approach to these tools between industry and academia.

Method:

We adopted the conceptual framework of software app stores from previous studies and used that to examine 8,318 automated production tools (440 Apps and 7,878 Actions) across 32 categories on GitHub Marketplace. We explored and described the policies of this marketplace as a unique platform where developers share production tools for the use of other developers. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic mapping of 515 research papers published from 2000 to 2021 and compared open-source academic production tools with those available in the marketplace.

Results:

We found that although some of the automation topics in literature are widely used in practice, they have yet to align with the state-of-practice for automated production. We discovered that practitioners often use automation tools for tasks like “Continuous Integration” and “Utilities”, while researchers tend to focus more on “Code Quality” and “Testing”.

Conclusion:

Our study illuminates the landscape of open-source tools for automation production. We also explored the disparities between industry trends and researchers’ priorities. Recognizing these distinctions can empower researchers to build on existing work and guide practitioners in selecting tools that meet their specific needs. Bridging this gap between industry and academia helps with further innovation in the field and ensures that research remains pertinent to the evolving challenges in software production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Systematic mapping study on requirements engineering for regulatory compliance of software systems Evaluating the understandability and user acceptance of Attack-Defense Trees: Original experiment and replication Who uses personas in requirements engineering: The practitioners’ perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1