Hilary L. Byrne PhD , Elisabeth Steiner PhD , Jeremy Booth PhD , Gillian Lamoury BMed , Marita Morgia MBBS , Susan Carroll MBBS , Kylie Richardson , Leigh Ambrose MARTP , Kuldeep Makhija , Cameron Stanton MSc , Benjamin Zwan PhD , Michael Carr MSc , Maegan Stewart PhD , Regina Bromley MSc , John Atyeo PhD , Shona Silvester MMedSc , Natalie Plant MHSc , Paul Keall PhD
{"title":"前瞻性随机试验:比较两种用于乳腺放疗中深吸气憋气管理的装置:BRAVEHeart 试验结果","authors":"Hilary L. Byrne PhD , Elisabeth Steiner PhD , Jeremy Booth PhD , Gillian Lamoury BMed , Marita Morgia MBBS , Susan Carroll MBBS , Kylie Richardson , Leigh Ambrose MARTP , Kuldeep Makhija , Cameron Stanton MSc , Benjamin Zwan PhD , Michael Carr MSc , Maegan Stewart PhD , Regina Bromley MSc , John Atyeo PhD , Shona Silvester MMedSc , Natalie Plant MHSc , Paul Keall PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350/pdfft?md5=19ca82eaa5d654d9d1e8467002b6d58d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001350-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial\",\"authors\":\"Hilary L. Byrne PhD , Elisabeth Steiner PhD , Jeremy Booth PhD , Gillian Lamoury BMed , Marita Morgia MBBS , Susan Carroll MBBS , Kylie Richardson , Leigh Ambrose MARTP , Kuldeep Makhija , Cameron Stanton MSc , Benjamin Zwan PhD , Michael Carr MSc , Maegan Stewart PhD , Regina Bromley MSc , John Atyeo PhD , Shona Silvester MMedSc , Natalie Plant MHSc , Paul Keall PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 101572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350/pdfft?md5=19ca82eaa5d654d9d1e8467002b6d58d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001350-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial
Purpose
The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.
Methods and Materials
Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.
Results
Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.
Conclusions
No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.