新型刚性密度计与梅纳德压力计在冲积砂中的比较

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotechnical Testing Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1520/gtj20220292
Théo Besson, C. Jacquard, M. Rispal, Philippe Reiffsteck, F. Szymkiewicz
{"title":"新型刚性密度计与梅纳德压力计在冲积砂中的比较","authors":"Théo Besson, C. Jacquard, M. Rispal, Philippe Reiffsteck, F. Szymkiewicz","doi":"10.1520/gtj20220292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Borehole expansion tests such as the Ménard pressuremeter test (PMT) are widely used in geotechnical testing as they provide a modulus that can be used to estimate settlements under geotechnical structures. This paper describes a new soil investigation apparatus that performs an expansion test in a prebored hole called the dilatometer Fondasol test (DFT). From this test, an in situ load-displacement curve is obtained in the same manner as the PMT. The apparatus is based on the concept of the rigid dilatometer used in rock mechanics with two rigid and semicylindrical shells spread against the borehole walls. Four different prototypes have been developed and successfully tested on Hostun sand reconstituted by vibration in a test chamber at a density index varying from 0.18 to 0.72. Results show that despite the significant differences in the shells’ geometry, they have little impact on the measurement of an apparent modulus. Three different formulas derived from elastic theory have been evaluated for the computation of dilatometer moduli: EDFT;M, EDFT;G, and EDFT;BJ. A comparative study with pressuremeter tests shows that EDFT;M and EDFT;BJ are close to the pressuremeter moduli EPMT;M with a ratio EPMT/EDFT ranging between 1.2 and 0.8 depending on the density of the sand. The moduli EDFT;G are significantly higher than EPMT;M and vary importantly depending on the prototypes. Dilatometer’s load-displacement curves show that global failure occurs at higher stresses than with the pressuremeter.","PeriodicalId":55099,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Testing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between a New Rigid Dilatometer and the Ménard Pressuremeter in a Reconstituted Sand\",\"authors\":\"Théo Besson, C. Jacquard, M. Rispal, Philippe Reiffsteck, F. Szymkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/gtj20220292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Borehole expansion tests such as the Ménard pressuremeter test (PMT) are widely used in geotechnical testing as they provide a modulus that can be used to estimate settlements under geotechnical structures. This paper describes a new soil investigation apparatus that performs an expansion test in a prebored hole called the dilatometer Fondasol test (DFT). From this test, an in situ load-displacement curve is obtained in the same manner as the PMT. The apparatus is based on the concept of the rigid dilatometer used in rock mechanics with two rigid and semicylindrical shells spread against the borehole walls. Four different prototypes have been developed and successfully tested on Hostun sand reconstituted by vibration in a test chamber at a density index varying from 0.18 to 0.72. Results show that despite the significant differences in the shells’ geometry, they have little impact on the measurement of an apparent modulus. Three different formulas derived from elastic theory have been evaluated for the computation of dilatometer moduli: EDFT;M, EDFT;G, and EDFT;BJ. A comparative study with pressuremeter tests shows that EDFT;M and EDFT;BJ are close to the pressuremeter moduli EPMT;M with a ratio EPMT/EDFT ranging between 1.2 and 0.8 depending on the density of the sand. The moduli EDFT;G are significantly higher than EPMT;M and vary importantly depending on the prototypes. Dilatometer’s load-displacement curves show that global failure occurs at higher stresses than with the pressuremeter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotechnical Testing Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotechnical Testing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20220292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Testing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20220292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诸如梅纳德压力计试验(PMT)之类的钻孔膨胀试验在土工试验中被广泛使用,因为它们提供的模量可用于估算土工结构下的沉降量。本文介绍了一种新的土壤勘测仪器,该仪器可在一个预钻孔中进行膨胀试验,称为稀释计丰达索尔试验(DFT)。通过该试验,可获得与 PMT 相同的原位荷载-位移曲线。该仪器基于岩石力学中使用的刚性膨胀仪的概念,有两个半圆柱形的刚性壳体贴在钻孔壁上。已开发出四种不同的原型,并在试验室中通过振动对密度指数从 0.18 到 0.72 不等的 Hostun 砂进行了成功测试。结果表明,尽管壳体的几何形状存在显著差异,但它们对表观模量的测量几乎没有影响。在计算扩张仪模量时,对三种不同的弹性理论公式进行了评估:EDFT;M、EDFT;G 和 EDFT;BJ。与压力计测试的比较研究表明,EDFT;M 和 EDFT;BJ 接近于压力计模量 EPMT;M,EPMT/EDFT 之比介于 1.2 和 0.8 之间,具体取决于砂的密度。EDFT;G的模量明显高于EPMT;M,并且因原型不同而有很大差异。Dilatometer 的载荷-位移曲线显示,与压力计相比,整体破坏发生在更高的应力下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between a New Rigid Dilatometer and the Ménard Pressuremeter in a Reconstituted Sand
Borehole expansion tests such as the Ménard pressuremeter test (PMT) are widely used in geotechnical testing as they provide a modulus that can be used to estimate settlements under geotechnical structures. This paper describes a new soil investigation apparatus that performs an expansion test in a prebored hole called the dilatometer Fondasol test (DFT). From this test, an in situ load-displacement curve is obtained in the same manner as the PMT. The apparatus is based on the concept of the rigid dilatometer used in rock mechanics with two rigid and semicylindrical shells spread against the borehole walls. Four different prototypes have been developed and successfully tested on Hostun sand reconstituted by vibration in a test chamber at a density index varying from 0.18 to 0.72. Results show that despite the significant differences in the shells’ geometry, they have little impact on the measurement of an apparent modulus. Three different formulas derived from elastic theory have been evaluated for the computation of dilatometer moduli: EDFT;M, EDFT;G, and EDFT;BJ. A comparative study with pressuremeter tests shows that EDFT;M and EDFT;BJ are close to the pressuremeter moduli EPMT;M with a ratio EPMT/EDFT ranging between 1.2 and 0.8 depending on the density of the sand. The moduli EDFT;G are significantly higher than EPMT;M and vary importantly depending on the prototypes. Dilatometer’s load-displacement curves show that global failure occurs at higher stresses than with the pressuremeter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Geotechnical Testing Journal 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Geotechnical Testing Journal is (1) to provide a high-quality publication that informs the profession of new developments in soil and rock testing and related fields; (2) to provide a forum for the exchange of information, particularly that which leads to the development of new test procedures; and (3) to stimulate active participation of the profession in the work of ASTM International Committee D18 on Soil and Rock and related information. The editorial scope of this journal covers test methods for soil and rock, sampling, nomenclature, and practices relating to the determination of properties and behavior of soil and rock for engineering purposes, and for soil as a medium for plant growth.
期刊最新文献
Stabilization Tests for Deep Mixing—Round-Robin Tests in Eight Finnish Laboratories Comparison between a New Rigid Dilatometer and the Ménard Pressuremeter in a Reconstituted Sand Development of Testing Procedures to Study the Impact of Erosion Voids on Buried Pipes Quantification of Gypsum in Soils via Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Calibration of Boundary-Type Earth Pressure Cells with Sand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1