10% 葡萄糖与挤出母乳在缓解新生儿手术疼痛方面的功效 - 一项随机对照试验

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Clinical Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jcn.jcn_37_24
Yuvasri Shanthi, Kanimozhi Thandapani, Revathi Krishnakumar, Bharath Kumar Thirunavukkarasu
{"title":"10% 葡萄糖与挤出母乳在缓解新生儿手术疼痛方面的功效 - 一项随机对照试验","authors":"Yuvasri Shanthi, Kanimozhi Thandapani, Revathi Krishnakumar, Bharath Kumar Thirunavukkarasu","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_37_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study aims to compare the efficacy of 10% dextrose (10%D) and expressed breast milk (EBM) in relieving heel prick pain in neonates assessed by premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R).\n \n \n \n This study was done in the neonatal intensive care unit under the department of pediatrics, hospital-based prospective, randomized controlled trial.\n \n \n \n The study includes neonates born between ≥34 weeks and ≤42 weeks of gestational age. The 72 enrolled neonates were randomized into two intervention groups (EBM and 10%D). One milliliter of test solution was given to the baby 30 s before the heel prick. Pain reactions were scored using the PIPP-R scoring system, and two independent observers were chosen, who were blinded to what intervention was given.\n \n \n \n For the EBM solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 7.19 ± 2, 5.5 ± 1.5 at 30 s, and 4.28 ± 1.65 at 60 s. For the 10%D solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 4.97 ± 1.42, 2.36 ± 1.44 at 30 s, and 1.69 ± 1.53 at 60 s. The difference in the mean PIPP-R between the two groups was statistically significant, and the 10%D group majority had only minimal pain throughout the procedure.\n \n \n \n Compared to the EBM group, 10%D significantly lowered the mean PIPP-R score, giving good pain relief and less procedural discomfort.\n","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of 10% Dextrose versus Expressed Breast Milk in Relieving Procedural Pain in Neonates – A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Yuvasri Shanthi, Kanimozhi Thandapani, Revathi Krishnakumar, Bharath Kumar Thirunavukkarasu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcn.jcn_37_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This study aims to compare the efficacy of 10% dextrose (10%D) and expressed breast milk (EBM) in relieving heel prick pain in neonates assessed by premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study was done in the neonatal intensive care unit under the department of pediatrics, hospital-based prospective, randomized controlled trial.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study includes neonates born between ≥34 weeks and ≤42 weeks of gestational age. The 72 enrolled neonates were randomized into two intervention groups (EBM and 10%D). One milliliter of test solution was given to the baby 30 s before the heel prick. Pain reactions were scored using the PIPP-R scoring system, and two independent observers were chosen, who were blinded to what intervention was given.\\n \\n \\n \\n For the EBM solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 7.19 ± 2, 5.5 ± 1.5 at 30 s, and 4.28 ± 1.65 at 60 s. For the 10%D solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 4.97 ± 1.42, 2.36 ± 1.44 at 30 s, and 1.69 ± 1.53 at 60 s. The difference in the mean PIPP-R between the two groups was statistically significant, and the 10%D group majority had only minimal pain throughout the procedure.\\n \\n \\n \\n Compared to the EBM group, 10%D significantly lowered the mean PIPP-R score, giving good pain relief and less procedural discomfort.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_37_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_37_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较 10%葡萄糖(10%D)和母乳(EBM)在缓解新生儿足跟刺痛方面的疗效,早产儿疼痛档案修订版(PIPP-R)对新生儿足跟刺痛进行了评估。 这项研究是在儿科部下属的新生儿重症监护室进行的医院前瞻性随机对照试验。 研究对象包括胎龄≥34周至≤42周的新生儿。72 名登记的新生儿被随机分为两个干预组(EBM 和 10%D 组)。在刺伤足跟前 30 秒给婴儿注射一毫升试验溶液。使用 PIPP-R 评分系统对疼痛反应进行评分,并选择两名独立观察员进行观察,这两名观察员对所采取的干预措施一无所知。 对于 EBM 溶液,0 秒时的平均 PIPP-R 为 7.19 ± 2,30 秒时为 5.5 ± 1.5,60 秒时为 4.28 ± 1.65;对于 10%D 溶液,0 秒时的平均 PIPP-R 为 4.97 ± 1.42,30 秒时为 2.36 ± 1.44,60 秒时为 1.69 ± 1.53。 与 EBM 组相比,10%D 组明显降低了 PIPP-R 的平均得分,使疼痛得到了很好的缓解,减少了手术中的不适感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of 10% Dextrose versus Expressed Breast Milk in Relieving Procedural Pain in Neonates – A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to compare the efficacy of 10% dextrose (10%D) and expressed breast milk (EBM) in relieving heel prick pain in neonates assessed by premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R). This study was done in the neonatal intensive care unit under the department of pediatrics, hospital-based prospective, randomized controlled trial. The study includes neonates born between ≥34 weeks and ≤42 weeks of gestational age. The 72 enrolled neonates were randomized into two intervention groups (EBM and 10%D). One milliliter of test solution was given to the baby 30 s before the heel prick. Pain reactions were scored using the PIPP-R scoring system, and two independent observers were chosen, who were blinded to what intervention was given. For the EBM solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 7.19 ± 2, 5.5 ± 1.5 at 30 s, and 4.28 ± 1.65 at 60 s. For the 10%D solution, the mean PIPP-R at 0 s was 4.97 ± 1.42, 2.36 ± 1.44 at 30 s, and 1.69 ± 1.53 at 60 s. The difference in the mean PIPP-R between the two groups was statistically significant, and the 10%D group majority had only minimal pain throughout the procedure. Compared to the EBM group, 10%D significantly lowered the mean PIPP-R score, giving good pain relief and less procedural discomfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Congenital Megalourethra Presented with Renal Anomalies Glomerular Filtration Rate in Sick Neonates: A Focus on Cystatin C Neonatal Enteroviral Meningoencephalitis: Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics of a Nosocomial Outbreak in Colombia Aphallia with Anal Stenosis and Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease: A Rare Case Report The Effect of Plastic Wrap Use to Prevent Hypothermia on Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Extreme Preterm Infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1