不稳定型心绞痛 (UAP)、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (NSTEMI) 和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI) ACS 患者未成熟血小板比例 (IPF) 值的比较

Fadhilaturrizqie Siregar, Husni, Deswita Sari
{"title":"不稳定型心绞痛 (UAP)、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (NSTEMI) 和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI) ACS 患者未成熟血小板比例 (IPF) 值的比较","authors":"Fadhilaturrizqie Siregar, Husni, Deswita Sari","doi":"10.37275/bsm.v8i10.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) is a hematological parameter that has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS. This study aims to compare IPF values in ACS patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). \nMethods: This research is an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design. The research subjects were ACS patients treated at Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia between January 2023 to December 2023. IPF values were measured using the Sysmex XN-1500 tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using the ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey test. \nResults: A total of 150 ACS patients (50 UAP, 50 NSTEMI, 50 STEMI) were included in this study. The mean IPF value in the STEMI group (6.8 ± 2.1%) was significantly higher than that in the NSTEMI (4.5 ± 1.8%) and UAP (3.2 ± 1.5%) groups (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the IPF value had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) for differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP. \nConclusion: IPF values were higher in STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI and UAP. This parameter has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS, especially in differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP.","PeriodicalId":102064,"journal":{"name":"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) Values for ACS Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP), Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarct (NSTEMI), and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarct (STEMI)\",\"authors\":\"Fadhilaturrizqie Siregar, Husni, Deswita Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.37275/bsm.v8i10.1087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) is a hematological parameter that has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS. This study aims to compare IPF values in ACS patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). \\nMethods: This research is an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design. The research subjects were ACS patients treated at Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia between January 2023 to December 2023. IPF values were measured using the Sysmex XN-1500 tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using the ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey test. \\nResults: A total of 150 ACS patients (50 UAP, 50 NSTEMI, 50 STEMI) were included in this study. The mean IPF value in the STEMI group (6.8 ± 2.1%) was significantly higher than that in the NSTEMI (4.5 ± 1.8%) and UAP (3.2 ± 1.5%) groups (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the IPF value had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) for differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP. \\nConclusion: IPF values were higher in STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI and UAP. This parameter has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS, especially in differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v8i10.1087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v8i10.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是一种需要快速诊断和治疗的急症。血小板未成熟率(IPF)是一种血液学参数,有可能成为区分急性冠脉综合征类型的生物标志物。本研究旨在比较不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的 ACS 患者的 IPF 值。研究方法本研究是一项分析性观察研究,采用横断面设计。研究对象是 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在印度尼西亚巴东 M. Djamil 医生总医院接受治疗的 ACS 患者。使用 Sysmex XN-1500 工具测量了 IPF 值。统计分析采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验。结果本研究共纳入 150 例 ACS 患者(50 例 UAP、50 例 NSTEMI、50 例 STEMI)。STEMI 组的平均 IPF 值(6.8 ± 2.1%)明显高于 NSTEMI 组(4.5 ± 1.8%)和 UAP 组(3.2 ± 1.5%)(P < 0.001)。ROC 分析显示,IPF 值在区分 STEMI 和 NSTEMI/UAP 方面的 AUC 为 0.89(95% CI:0.84-0.94)。结论与 NSTEMI 和 UAP 相比,STEMI 患者的 IPF 值更高。该参数有望成为区分 ACS 类型的生物标记物,尤其是在区分 STEMI 和 NSTEMI/UAP 时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) Values for ACS Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP), Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarct (NSTEMI), and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarct (STEMI)
Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) is a hematological parameter that has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS. This study aims to compare IPF values in ACS patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This research is an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design. The research subjects were ACS patients treated at Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia between January 2023 to December 2023. IPF values were measured using the Sysmex XN-1500 tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using the ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey test. Results: A total of 150 ACS patients (50 UAP, 50 NSTEMI, 50 STEMI) were included in this study. The mean IPF value in the STEMI group (6.8 ± 2.1%) was significantly higher than that in the NSTEMI (4.5 ± 1.8%) and UAP (3.2 ± 1.5%) groups (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the IPF value had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) for differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP. Conclusion: IPF values were higher in STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI and UAP. This parameter has the potential to be a biomarker for differentiating types of ACS, especially in differentiating STEMI from NSTEMI/UAP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complete Neurological Recovery Following 360-Degree Decompression and Fusion for T11 Giant Cell Tumor: A Case Report Relationship between Hyperglycemia and Retinopathy of Prematurity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review Analysis of Risk Factors and The Impact of Nitric Oxide (NO) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) Levels on Lung Function: A Comparative Study of Palm Oil Factory Workers and the Community in Kuantan Mudik District, Riau, Indonesia Risk Factors for Sleep Disorders in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Meta-Analysis The Role of Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase 1 (RIPK1) in CD4+ T Cell Necroptosis in HIV Patients: A Narrative Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1