消费者对在线评论中未披露的人工智能生成功能的反应

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102163
Clinton Amos, Lixuan Zhang
{"title":"消费者对在线评论中未披露的人工智能生成功能的反应","authors":"Clinton Amos,&nbsp;Lixuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While artificial intelligence’s (AI) promise for fake online review detection has been investigated, other questions have emerged with ChatGPT’s introduction, a generative AI platform. This research provides a much-needed investigation into consumer reactions to reviews perceived to be generated by ChatGPT vs. a human. Results from three studies in TripAdvisor hotel review and Yelp restaurant review contexts revealed that consumers rate reviews as less useful, trustworthy, and authentic if they perceived ChatGPT generated them. Further, the findings were robust regardless of review valence and even when participants were informed the reviewer possessed a TripAdvisor Expert badge. These findings’ theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102163"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer reactions to perceived undisclosed ChatGPT usage in an online review context\",\"authors\":\"Clinton Amos,&nbsp;Lixuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While artificial intelligence’s (AI) promise for fake online review detection has been investigated, other questions have emerged with ChatGPT’s introduction, a generative AI platform. This research provides a much-needed investigation into consumer reactions to reviews perceived to be generated by ChatGPT vs. a human. Results from three studies in TripAdvisor hotel review and Yelp restaurant review contexts revealed that consumers rate reviews as less useful, trustworthy, and authentic if they perceived ChatGPT generated them. Further, the findings were robust regardless of review valence and even when participants were informed the reviewer possessed a TripAdvisor Expert badge. These findings’ theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with limitations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000674\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然人工智能(AI)在虚假在线评论检测方面的前景已经得到了研究,但随着 ChatGPT 这一生成式人工智能平台的推出,其他问题也随之出现。本研究对消费者对 ChatGPT 与人工生成的评论的反应进行了亟需的调查。在 TripAdvisor 酒店评论和 Yelp 餐厅评论中进行的三项研究结果表明,如果消费者认为评论是由 ChatGPT 生成的,那么他们对评论的有用性、可信度和真实性的评价就会降低。此外,无论评论的价值如何,甚至当参与者被告知评论者拥有 TripAdvisor 专家徽章时,研究结果都是稳健的。本文讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义以及局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer reactions to perceived undisclosed ChatGPT usage in an online review context

While artificial intelligence’s (AI) promise for fake online review detection has been investigated, other questions have emerged with ChatGPT’s introduction, a generative AI platform. This research provides a much-needed investigation into consumer reactions to reviews perceived to be generated by ChatGPT vs. a human. Results from three studies in TripAdvisor hotel review and Yelp restaurant review contexts revealed that consumers rate reviews as less useful, trustworthy, and authentic if they perceived ChatGPT generated them. Further, the findings were robust regardless of review valence and even when participants were informed the reviewer possessed a TripAdvisor Expert badge. These findings’ theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Towards harmonization of EU and UN methodologies for the assessment of eGovernment How to fight loneliness: The importance of networked friendship quality and self-esteem differs with age Overcoming social and ethical challenges of AI through organizational resilience. A PLS-SEM approach Understanding online shopping fraud among Chinese elderly: Extending routine activity theory in the online context Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1